init: company-haness 설계
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,203 @@
|
||||
team-topology-map:
|
||||
version: 1
|
||||
source-document: IT 대기업 직무 성장 분석.md
|
||||
purpose: Map each AI role to the large-scale IT operating model so workflow routing preserves business, platform, enabling, and specialist responsibilities.
|
||||
|
||||
role-count-policy:
|
||||
total-ai-role-agents: 62
|
||||
topology-is-role-count-increasing: false
|
||||
gtm-revenue-role-agents: 10
|
||||
explanation: Team topology, EA layers, Golden Path, SLO, Shift-left Security, and GTM revenue stack are operating lenses for routing existing role agents. GTM revenue roles are counted only because roles.yaml explicitly defines 10 additional role agents.
|
||||
|
||||
governance-and-orchestration-roles:
|
||||
mission: Set direction, balance executive tradeoffs, manage workflow state, and approve or escalate decisions.
|
||||
default-roles:
|
||||
- EXEC-CEO
|
||||
- OPS-ORCH
|
||||
- EXEC-CTO
|
||||
- EXEC-CPO
|
||||
- EXEC-CFO
|
||||
- EXEC-COO
|
||||
- EXEC-CPTO
|
||||
- EXEC-VPENG
|
||||
|
||||
team-types:
|
||||
stream-aligned:
|
||||
mission: Deliver end-to-end customer or business-domain value.
|
||||
primary-interaction: consume-platform-and-enabling-guidance
|
||||
workflow-use:
|
||||
- product discovery
|
||||
- customer problem solving
|
||||
- feature implementation
|
||||
- experiment learning
|
||||
default-roles:
|
||||
- PROD-PM
|
||||
- PROD-PO
|
||||
- DES-PROD
|
||||
- DES-INTERNAL
|
||||
- ENG-FE
|
||||
- ENG-BE
|
||||
- ENG-BEGEN
|
||||
- ENG-PRODSERVER
|
||||
- ENG-PRODUCTMINDED
|
||||
- ENG-SW
|
||||
- ENG-FEUX
|
||||
- DATA-ANALYST
|
||||
- OPS-CH
|
||||
- OPS-CREW
|
||||
|
||||
enabling:
|
||||
mission: Remove knowledge gaps, technical debt, process friction, and organizational bottlenecks across teams.
|
||||
primary-interaction: short-term-collaboration-and-coaching
|
||||
workflow-use:
|
||||
- business capability mapping
|
||||
- value stream improvement
|
||||
- quality improvement
|
||||
- security guidance
|
||||
- productivity improvement
|
||||
default-roles:
|
||||
- STR-ANALYST
|
||||
- UX-RESEARCHER
|
||||
- ARCH-BA
|
||||
- ARCH-BIZANALYST
|
||||
- ARCH-EA
|
||||
- QA
|
||||
- SEC-ENGINEER
|
||||
- SEC-APPSEC
|
||||
- SEC-CHAMPION
|
||||
- ENG-PRODCHAPTER
|
||||
|
||||
complicated-subsystem:
|
||||
mission: Own deep specialist subsystems that should be exposed to product teams through simple interfaces.
|
||||
primary-interaction: x-as-a-service-interface
|
||||
workflow-use:
|
||||
- complex architecture decision
|
||||
- technical product design
|
||||
- specialized engine or subsystem work
|
||||
- high-complexity data/application/technology architecture
|
||||
default-roles:
|
||||
- PROD-TPO
|
||||
- ARCH-SOLUTION
|
||||
- ARCH-SYSANALYST
|
||||
- ARCH-DATA
|
||||
- ARCH-APP
|
||||
- ARCH-TECH
|
||||
- ARCH-SWAT
|
||||
- ENG-DESKTOP
|
||||
- DATA-BIGDATA
|
||||
|
||||
platform:
|
||||
mission: Provide self-service internal platforms, golden paths, common components, and safe deployment foundations.
|
||||
primary-interaction: platform-as-a-product
|
||||
workflow-use:
|
||||
- golden path design
|
||||
- internal developer platform
|
||||
- reusable components
|
||||
- observability and reliability
|
||||
- secure paved road
|
||||
default-roles:
|
||||
- PROD-PPO
|
||||
- DES-PLATFORM
|
||||
- ENG-FEPLAT
|
||||
- ENG-PLATSERVER
|
||||
- INFRA-DEV
|
||||
- INFRA-PLATFORM
|
||||
- INFRA-DEVOPS
|
||||
- SRE
|
||||
- SEC-DEVSECOPS
|
||||
- DATA-ENGINEER
|
||||
- ARCH-IT
|
||||
|
||||
gtm-revenue:
|
||||
mission: Build and operate the revenue stack across demand creation, conversion infrastructure, product-led sales, customer expansion, pricing, compliance, and channels.
|
||||
primary-interaction: lead-to-cash-and-product-led-sales-handoff
|
||||
workflow-use:
|
||||
- GTM strategy
|
||||
- revenue stack design
|
||||
- PLG/PLS/SLG motion selection
|
||||
- product-led sales handoff
|
||||
- pricing and packaging governance
|
||||
- demand generation
|
||||
- sales pipeline execution
|
||||
- customer success expansion and churn prevention
|
||||
- partner and channel expansion
|
||||
- legal and compliance review
|
||||
default-roles:
|
||||
- GTM-GROWTHPM
|
||||
- GTM-PMM
|
||||
- GTM-SALES
|
||||
- GTM-CS
|
||||
- GTM-PRICING
|
||||
- GTM-REVOPS
|
||||
- GTM-LEGAL
|
||||
- GTM-CI
|
||||
- GTM-DEMANDGEN
|
||||
- GTM-PARTNER
|
||||
|
||||
complete-role-coverage:
|
||||
governance-and-orchestration: [EXEC-CEO, OPS-ORCH, EXEC-CTO, EXEC-CPO, EXEC-CFO, EXEC-COO, EXEC-CPTO, EXEC-VPENG]
|
||||
stream-aligned: [PROD-PM, PROD-PO, DES-PROD, DES-INTERNAL, ENG-FE, ENG-BE, ENG-BEGEN, ENG-PRODSERVER, ENG-PRODUCTMINDED, ENG-SW, ENG-FEUX, DATA-ANALYST, OPS-CH, OPS-CREW]
|
||||
enabling: [STR-ANALYST, UX-RESEARCHER, ARCH-BA, ARCH-BIZANALYST, ARCH-EA, QA, SEC-ENGINEER, SEC-APPSEC, SEC-CHAMPION, ENG-PRODCHAPTER]
|
||||
complicated-subsystem: [PROD-TPO, ARCH-SOLUTION, ARCH-SYSANALYST, ARCH-DATA, ARCH-APP, ARCH-TECH, ARCH-SWAT, ENG-DESKTOP, DATA-BIGDATA]
|
||||
platform: [PROD-PPO, DES-PLATFORM, ENG-FEPLAT, ENG-PLATSERVER, INFRA-DEV, INFRA-PLATFORM, INFRA-DEVOPS, SRE, SEC-DEVSECOPS, DATA-ENGINEER, ARCH-IT]
|
||||
gtm-revenue: [GTM-GROWTHPM, GTM-PMM, GTM-SALES, GTM-CS, GTM-PRICING, GTM-REVOPS, GTM-LEGAL, GTM-CI, GTM-DEMANDGEN, GTM-PARTNER]
|
||||
|
||||
executive-balance:
|
||||
principle: C-Level reports must expose tradeoffs instead of merging opinions into a single unsupported recommendation.
|
||||
required-dimensions:
|
||||
CEO: long-term company value, portfolio fit, customer and shareholder value
|
||||
CTO: architecture, reliability, security, scalability, technical debt
|
||||
CPO: customer problem, product value, roadmap, P/L
|
||||
CFO: cost, ROI, capital efficiency, opportunity cost
|
||||
COO: operational feasibility, process, staffing, support burden
|
||||
CPTO: product-technology integration and conflict reduction
|
||||
conflict-record-required-when:
|
||||
- product-speed-vs-technical-stability
|
||||
- revenue-opportunity-vs-operational-cost
|
||||
- customer-value-vs-security-risk
|
||||
- platform-standardization-vs-squad-autonomy
|
||||
- growth-conversion-vs-customer-trust
|
||||
- sales-speed-vs-legal-compliance
|
||||
- pricing-margin-vs-product-adoption
|
||||
- demand-volume-vs-pipeline-quality
|
||||
|
||||
revenue-stack-layers:
|
||||
demand-creation:
|
||||
owner-roles: [GTM-DEMANDGEN, GTM-PMM, GTM-CI]
|
||||
outputs: [ICP-definition, ABM-plan, SEO-AEO-plan, campaign-brief, sales-battlecard]
|
||||
conversion-infrastructure:
|
||||
owner-roles: [GTM-GROWTHPM, GTM-PMM, GTM-REVOPS, PROD-PM, PROD-PO]
|
||||
outputs: [PLS-threshold, onboarding-funnel, PQL-definition, handoff-brief]
|
||||
revenue-intelligence:
|
||||
owner-roles: [GTM-REVOPS, GTM-SALES, GTM-CS, GTM-PRICING, GTM-CI]
|
||||
outputs: [pipeline-forecast, lead-score, churn-score, pricing-model, win-loss-analysis]
|
||||
revenue-risk-governance:
|
||||
owner-roles: [GTM-LEGAL, GTM-PRICING, EXEC-CFO, EXEC-COO]
|
||||
outputs: [MSA-review, pricing-governance, compliance-risk-review, discount-approval-policy]
|
||||
|
||||
enterprise-architecture-layers:
|
||||
business-architecture:
|
||||
owner-roles: [ARCH-BA, ARCH-BIZANALYST, ARCH-EA]
|
||||
outputs: [business-capability-map, value-stream-map, process-model, to-be-architecture]
|
||||
data-architecture:
|
||||
owner-roles: [ARCH-DATA, DATA-ENGINEER, DATA-BIGDATA]
|
||||
outputs: [conceptual-data-model, logical-data-model, physical-data-model, data-pipeline-flow]
|
||||
application-architecture:
|
||||
owner-roles: [ARCH-APP, ARCH-SOLUTION, ENG-BE, ENG-FE]
|
||||
outputs: [service-boundary, api-contract, integration-flow, ui-backend-mapping]
|
||||
technology-architecture:
|
||||
owner-roles: [ARCH-TECH, ARCH-IT, INFRA-PLATFORM, INFRA-DEVOPS, SRE]
|
||||
outputs: [infrastructure-blueprint, cloud-landing-zone, network-topology, disaster-recovery-plan]
|
||||
security-architecture:
|
||||
owner-roles: [SEC-ENGINEER, SEC-APPSEC, SEC-DEVSECOPS, SEC-CHAMPION]
|
||||
outputs: [threat-model, shift-left-check, iam-policy, secure-paved-road]
|
||||
|
||||
routing-rules:
|
||||
- If the task is about a customer-facing domain, start with stream-aligned roles and add platform/enabling roles only when risk or shared capability requires them.
|
||||
- If more than two stream-aligned teams would solve the same infrastructure or tooling problem, route to platform roles before implementation.
|
||||
- If the task introduces deep specialist complexity, route to complicated-subsystem roles and require a simple interface contract for stream-aligned teams.
|
||||
- If the task exposes repeated friction, skill gaps, quality failures, or process waste, route to enabling roles before expanding implementation.
|
||||
- If the task changes production reliability, security, data integrity, or deployment foundations, require platform and auditor roles before release.
|
||||
- If the task affects revenue, GTM motion, pricing, demand generation, product-led sales, customer expansion, or lead-to-cash process, route to gtm-revenue roles.
|
||||
- If product usage data triggers sales handoff, require Growth PM, PMM, RevOps, Sales, and Customer Success consideration before outbound action.
|
||||
- If pricing, contracts, enterprise procurement, or compliance claims are involved, require Pricing Strategist and Legal/Compliance review before customer-facing commitments.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user