docs(keycloak-session-store): rewrite the prose and the diagram labels out of AI register

Two things read as machine-written and both are now fixed with the repository's own tooling. The diagram labels counted abstractions instead of naming things — "틀린 예측 5건", "조용한 실패 9건", "로컬 아티팩트 76건". Replaced with what those actually were, which is also more useful in a drawing: 틀린 예측 5건 -> A-1 · A-2 · A-6 · B-4 · B-6 조용한 실패 9건 -> NetworkPolicy · tc · kill · iptables 로컬 아티팩트 76건 -> 연결수 0 · 50µs A층 결론 3건 반전 -> A-1 · A-2 · A-8 The prose was staccato: 30.7 characters average against a 48-75 reference, 45% of sentences under 25 characters, and causal connectives at 4.9 per 100 against a floor of 6. check_prose reported an error for closing six sentences with 「~것이 ~이다」. Roughly ninety sentences were rewritten — joining pairs that carry a real causal or contrastive relation, and varying the joins. The first pass overcorrected into a new monotony (는데 at 47 occurrences, connectives up to 31.9, above the ceiling), so twenty-three of those were varied into 지만, -고, em-dashes, or split back apart. check_prose FAIL error 1 -> OK error 0 평균 문장 길이 30.7 -> 43.1 25자 미만 비율 45.4% -> 23.4% 이유 연결어미 4.9 -> within range Two style_profile numbers still read outside the band, and the reason is worth writing down rather than editing around: the tool counts each image caption as a sentence, and this document carries 28 diagrams. Excluding captions and separators the prose is 46.4 characters average with 14.3% short — inside the reference range. Padding sentences to move the remaining gap is what CLAUDE.md forbids, so it stops here. Protected values were checked against source and are unchanged: 153건/149건, 1,872 ms, 20,000 ms, 22.2 초, 2305초, 845361바이트, 8856건, 205.7ms, 106초. All 28 diagrams still lint clean with no sentence left on any canvas. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-05 12:05:52 +09:00
parent 95c0e680b5
commit 73026cada6
35 changed files with 328 additions and 323 deletions
@@ -40,6 +40,13 @@ const RULES = [
    re: /[^\n?]{4,60}([가-힣]\s*걸까\?|지\s*않을까\?|[가-힣]\s*게\s*아닐까\?|[가-힣]\s*것일까\?)/g,
    msg: '답이 예·아니오뿐인 물음을 끼워 넣었습니다. 종결어미 수를 채우려고 넣은 문장이면 지우고, 답할 물음이면 무엇을 묻는지 적으세요.' },

+  // 역할을 세어 대칭을 만들고 닫는 문장. 「하나가 나머지 둘을 대신하지 못한다」·「각각 다른 구간을
+  // 맡는다」·「그 자리를 메우지 못한다」. 참고 여섯 편에 한 건도 없다. 무엇이 실제로 통과하는지를
+  // 말하지 않고 구조가 정연하다는 인상만 남긴다.
+  { id: 'role-symmetry', sev: ERR,
+    re: /(나머지\s*(둘|셋|하나)[^.\n]{0,20}(대신|자리|메우)|어느\s*하나도[^.\n]{0,25}(대신|자리)|각각\s*다른\s*[가-힣]{1,8}(을|를|에서|에)\s*(맡|쓰이|담당)|그\s*자리를\s*(대신|메우)|서로\s*독립된\s*[가-힣\d]{1,6}\s*곳|만으로는[^.\n]{0,40}(속성|성질)을\s*대신)/g,
+    msg: '역할을 세어 대칭을 만들었습니다. 그것 하나만 있을 때 무엇이 실제로 통과하는지 적으세요.' },
+
  { id: 'nominalized', sev: ERR, re: /(채워진\s*목록\s*수|준비한\s*SQL\s*문장|획득한[^.\n]{0,10}객체\s*수|[가-힣]+에\s*대한\s*(측정|비교|확인|분석))/g,
    msg: '사건을 명사구로 바꿨습니다. 동사로 적으세요.' },