DongHyeonkaandClaude Opus 5
b2963105a8
The keycloak project ended with four open questions that design could not
settle. A two-VM lab was built to answer them by measurement, and this is
that material: 26 experiments, 125 raw command outputs, 22 browser captures.
Follows the import procedure in README.md.
source/ the originating repository verbatim — 78 documents, 28 SVGs,
8 manifests, plus .source-revision recording the commit
final/ the SSOT
document.md 729 lines written from the 29 experiment documents, not
concatenated: what was predicted, what was measured, and
where the measurement itself was wrong
evidence/raw 125 outputs, flattened to <experiment>__<file> because
the originals collided (01-baseline.txt appeared three
times) and the audit only globs the top level
evidence/meta one per raw file; command and exitCode are null and the
README says why rather than inventing them
evidence/browser 22 captures
assets/ three diagrams through techviz
.techviz/ their VizSpecs
A separate project rather than an addition to keycloak: the B-layer answers
that project's four questions, but the A, C and D layers are about cluster
failure, SSO and operations, and one document.md should hold one subject.
The four question records there can point here through 관계.
Recorded rather than papered over: only three of the 28 diagrams were
remade. The repository forbids hand-drawn SVG and forbids titles inside the
canvas; all 28 originals carry both, so converting them is redrawing, not
reformatting. They stay in source/ and the gap is written into the document.
verify-pipeline.py passes. audit-records.py reports no issues.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
49 lines
2.1 KiB
Plaintext
49 lines
2.1 KiB
Plaintext
# 같은 IDENTITY 매핑을 두 접근 방식으로 선언해 가드에 넘긴다
|
|
@Entity
|
|
static class FieldAccessIdentity {
|
|
@Id @GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.IDENTITY) private Long id;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
@Entity
|
|
static class PropertyAccessIdentity {
|
|
private Long id;
|
|
|
|
@Id
|
|
@GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.IDENTITY)
|
|
public Long getId() {
|
|
return id;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
public void setId(Long id) {
|
|
this.id = id;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
프로파일 batchingRequired : true
|
|
FieldAccessIdentity IDENTITY 탐지 true 검증 거절
|
|
PropertyAccessIdentity IDENTITY 탐지 false 검증 통과
|
|
|
|
# 하이버네이트는 그 둘을 어떻게 읽는가 — 시퀀스를 대조군으로 둔다
|
|
필드 접근 식별자 멤버 Field 삽입 200 프리페어드 스테이트먼트 200
|
|
프로퍼티 접근 식별자 멤버 Method 삽입 200 프리페어드 스테이트먼트 200
|
|
시퀀스(대조군) 식별자 멤버 Field 삽입 200 프리페어드 스테이트먼트 6
|
|
|
|
# 가드의 거절이 근거로 삼는 측정과 그것이 도는 레인
|
|
22:@Tag("jpa-contract")
|
|
25: private static final int BATCH_SIZE = 50;
|
|
26: private static final int ROWS = 200;
|
|
43: @DisplayName("a sequence entity really produces JDBC batches")
|
|
59: .isGreaterThan(1L);
|
|
64: @DisplayName("an IDENTITY entity produces no JDBC batch at all")
|
|
80: .isZero();
|
|
85: @DisplayName("the sequence assigns identifiers before the flush, so entities are complete")
|
|
103: @DisplayName("an IDENTITY key only exists after the insert has been executed")
|
|
250:def jpaPlatformContractTest = registerJpaPlatformLane(
|
|
251- 'jpaPlatformContractTest',
|
|
252- 'jpa-contract',
|
|
jpa-nightly.yml:49: :adapter:outbound:persistence-jpa:jpaPlatformContractTest
|
|
jpa-pr.yml:86: :adapter:outbound:persistence-jpa:jpaPlatformContractTest
|
|
gradlew :adapter:outbound:persistence-jpa:jpaPlatformContractTest --console=plain
|
|
gradlew :adapter:outbound:persistence-jpa:jpaPlatformContractTest :adapter:outbound:persistence-jpa:jpaPlatformFailureTest --console=plain
|