DongHyeonkaandClaude Opus 5
b2963105a8
The keycloak project ended with four open questions that design could not
settle. A two-VM lab was built to answer them by measurement, and this is
that material: 26 experiments, 125 raw command outputs, 22 browser captures.
Follows the import procedure in README.md.
source/ the originating repository verbatim — 78 documents, 28 SVGs,
8 manifests, plus .source-revision recording the commit
final/ the SSOT
document.md 729 lines written from the 29 experiment documents, not
concatenated: what was predicted, what was measured, and
where the measurement itself was wrong
evidence/raw 125 outputs, flattened to <experiment>__<file> because
the originals collided (01-baseline.txt appeared three
times) and the audit only globs the top level
evidence/meta one per raw file; command and exitCode are null and the
README says why rather than inventing them
evidence/browser 22 captures
assets/ three diagrams through techviz
.techviz/ their VizSpecs
A separate project rather than an addition to keycloak: the B-layer answers
that project's four questions, but the A, C and D layers are about cluster
failure, SSO and operations, and one document.md should hold one subject.
The four question records there can point here through 관계.
Recorded rather than papered over: only three of the 28 diagrams were
remade. The repository forbids hand-drawn SVG and forbids titles inside the
canvas; all 28 originals carry both, so converting them is redrawing, not
reformatting. They stay in source/ and the gap is written into the document.
verify-pipeline.py passes. audit-records.py reports no issues.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2.4 KiB
kind, slug, title, topic, project, status, sourceRevision, rootTreeNode, evidenceCapturedOn, assets, evidence, source, module
| kind | slug | title | topic | project | status | sourceRevision | rootTreeNode | evidenceCapturedOn | assets | evidence | source | module | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CONCEPT | messaging-policy-c02 | bean 정의는 전부 starter 쪽에 있다 | delivery-and-settlement-models | clean-architecture-backend-template | 게시 전 | 21234e38cdb9a926cbc92bb97a2aee2e4a7d2916 | concept:messaging-policy-c02 | 2026-09-01 |
|
|
|
messaging-policy |
bean 정의는 전부 starter 쪽에 있다
들어오는 것: messaging-core-api(api), messaging-schema-api(api). 둘 다 api인 이유는 DestinationProfile이 DeliveryGuarantee·OrderingScope·DestinationKind·DestinationName(core-api)와 SchemaCompatibility(schema-api)를 필드로 갖기 때문이다.
관계
- 구성 오류는 한 예외 타입과 안정 코드로 보고한다 같은 분석 리프에서 끌어낸 규칙이다.
- 저장소 밖 문서를 절 번호로 인용하지 않는다 같은 분석 리프에서 끌어낸 규칙이다.
- 부팅 경로의 알고리즘 복잡도는 문서화한다 같은 분석 리프에서 끌어낸 규칙이다.
본문
들어오는 것은 messaging-core-api(api)와 messaging-schema-api(api)다. 둘 다 api인 이유는 DestinationProfile이 DeliveryGuarantee·OrderingScope·DestinationKind·DestinationName(core-api)와 SchemaCompatibility(schema-api)를 필드로 갖기 때문이다.
이 기록이 다루는 범위
:::evidence key="messaging-policy-c02" alt="코드베이스에서 파일 목록을 만든 출력 25줄. 이 기록이 다루는 범위가 그 목록이다." caption="코드베이스 파일 목록 — 25줄 · exit 0" zoom="true" :::
나가는 쪽
messaging-transport-spi, messaging-runtime-core, messaging-kafka, messaging-kafka-share-experimental, messaging-rabbit, messaging-outbox-jdbc-postgresql, messaging-admin-api, messaging-admin-runtime, messaging-pulsar-experimental, messaging-nats-experimental, messaging-spring-cloud-stream-bridge, messaging-spring-boot-starter, messaging-testkit.
실제 배선 지점 넷이 전부 starter 안에 있다
전부 messaging-spring-boot-starter/MessagingCoreAutoConfiguration이다. 이 leaf 자체는 Spring 주석을 갖지 않는다.