DongHyeonkaandClaude Opus 5
b2963105a8
The keycloak project ended with four open questions that design could not
settle. A two-VM lab was built to answer them by measurement, and this is
that material: 26 experiments, 125 raw command outputs, 22 browser captures.
Follows the import procedure in README.md.
source/ the originating repository verbatim — 78 documents, 28 SVGs,
8 manifests, plus .source-revision recording the commit
final/ the SSOT
document.md 729 lines written from the 29 experiment documents, not
concatenated: what was predicted, what was measured, and
where the measurement itself was wrong
evidence/raw 125 outputs, flattened to <experiment>__<file> because
the originals collided (01-baseline.txt appeared three
times) and the audit only globs the top level
evidence/meta one per raw file; command and exitCode are null and the
README says why rather than inventing them
evidence/browser 22 captures
assets/ three diagrams through techviz
.techviz/ their VizSpecs
A separate project rather than an addition to keycloak: the B-layer answers
that project's four questions, but the A, C and D layers are about cluster
failure, SSO and operations, and one document.md should hold one subject.
The four question records there can point here through 관계.
Recorded rather than papered over: only three of the 28 diagrams were
remade. The repository forbids hand-drawn SVG and forbids titles inside the
canvas; all 28 originals carry both, so converting them is redrawing, not
reformatting. They stay in source/ and the gap is written into the document.
verify-pipeline.py passes. audit-records.py reports no issues.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2.8 KiB
kind, slug, title, topic, project, status, sourceRevision, rootTreeNode, evidenceCapturedOn, assets, evidence, source, module
| kind | slug | title | topic | project | status | sourceRevision | rootTreeNode | evidenceCapturedOn | assets | evidence | source | module | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CONCEPT | messaging-core-api-c02 | 의존이 하나도 없고 나머지 24개 전부가 이것을 의존한다 | schema-and-wire-models | clean-architecture-backend-template | 게시 전 | 21234e38cdb9a926cbc92bb97a2aee2e4a7d2916 | concept:messaging-core-api-c02 | 2026-09-01 |
|
|
|
messaging-core-api |
의존이 하나도 없고 나머지 24개 전부가 이것을 의존한다
들어오는 것: 없음. registry allowed_dependencies: []이고 build.gradle에 선언이 없다.
본문
들어오는 것은 없다 — registry allowed_dependencies: []이고 build.gradle에 선언이 없다.
이 기록이 다루는 범위
:::evidence key="messaging-core-api-c02" alt="코드베이스에서 파일 목록을 만든 출력 25줄. 이 기록이 다루는 범위가 그 목록이다." caption="코드베이스 파일 목록 — 25줄 · exit 0" zoom="true" :::
나가는 쪽은 messaging family 전부다
messaging-schema-api, messaging-schema-json, messaging-schema-avro, messaging-schema-protobuf, messaging-cloudevents, messaging-policy, messaging-transport-spi, messaging-runtime-core, messaging-observability, messaging-security, messaging-kafka, messaging-kafka-share-experimental, messaging-rabbit, messaging-reliability-api, messaging-outbox-jdbc-postgresql, messaging-inbox-jdbc-postgresql, messaging-claim-check, messaging-admin-api, messaging-admin-runtime, messaging-pulsar-experimental, messaging-nats-experimental, messaging-spring-cloud-stream-bridge, messaging-spring-boot-starter, messaging-testkit — 나머지 24개 전부.
편입이 전이로 일어난다
runtime_memberships: ["app-bootstrap"]이고, 그 편입은 직접 선언이 아니라 **전이(transitive)**로 일어난다. src/app-bootstrap/build.gradle:87이 선언하는 것은 starter 하나이고, starter의 allowed_dependencies가 17개 leaf를 끌고 오며 그 closure에 messaging-core-api가 있다. 즉 배포 아티팩트가 이 leaf를 싣는다. 실행 여부는 별개이고 master switch app.messaging.enabled(기본 false)가 결정한다(src/messaging/CLAUDE.md:56-57).
비교할 sibling bean이 없다
이 leaf 자체는 bean을 하나도 만들지 않는다. Spring stereotype·@Bean·@Conditional·@Profile 주석이 leaf 전체에 0개다(evidence/raw/269 §F, git grep exit=1). 따라서 §12.2의 conditional sibling 비교는 이 leaf에 적용 대상이 없다.