DongHyeonkaandClaude Opus 5
b2963105a8
The keycloak project ended with four open questions that design could not
settle. A two-VM lab was built to answer them by measurement, and this is
that material: 26 experiments, 125 raw command outputs, 22 browser captures.
Follows the import procedure in README.md.
source/ the originating repository verbatim — 78 documents, 28 SVGs,
8 manifests, plus .source-revision recording the commit
final/ the SSOT
document.md 729 lines written from the 29 experiment documents, not
concatenated: what was predicted, what was measured, and
where the measurement itself was wrong
evidence/raw 125 outputs, flattened to <experiment>__<file> because
the originals collided (01-baseline.txt appeared three
times) and the audit only globs the top level
evidence/meta one per raw file; command and exitCode are null and the
README says why rather than inventing them
evidence/browser 22 captures
assets/ three diagrams through techviz
.techviz/ their VizSpecs
A separate project rather than an addition to keycloak: the B-layer answers
that project's four questions, but the A, C and D layers are about cluster
failure, SSO and operations, and one document.md should hold one subject.
The four question records there can point here through 관계.
Recorded rather than papered over: only three of the 28 diagrams were
remade. The repository forbids hand-drawn SVG and forbids titles inside the
canvas; all 28 originals carry both, so converting them is redrawing, not
reformatting. They stay in source/ and the gap is written into the document.
verify-pipeline.py passes. audit-records.py reports no issues.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
1.9 KiB
1.9 KiB
kind, slug, title, topic, project, status, sourceRevision, rootTreeNode, evidenceCapturedOn, assets, evidence, source, module
| kind | slug | title | topic | project | status | sourceRevision | rootTreeNode | evidenceCapturedOn | assets | evidence | source | module | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CONCEPT | adapter-inbound-web-c07 | 지문이 길이 프레이밍 없이 구분자로만 만들어진다 | security-and-trust-boundaries | clean-architecture-backend-template | 게시 전 | 21234e38cdb9a926cbc92bb97a2aee2e4a7d2916 | concept:adapter-inbound-web-c07 | 2026-09-01 |
|
|
|
adapter-inbound-web |
지문이 길이 프레이밍 없이 구분자로만 만들어진다
SemanticRequestFingerprintFactory는 U+001F 한 글자를 구분자로 쓰고 값에 이스케이프나 길이 접두사를 붙이지 않는다. 같은 저장소의 다른 다이제스트들은 4바이트 길이 프레이밍을 쓴다.
본문
SemanticRequestFingerprintFactory는 U+001F 한 글자를 구분자로 쓰고, 경로 변수는 SEP + name + "=" + value, 헤더는 SEP + name + ":" + value로 이어붙인다. 값에 대한 이스케이프나 길이 접두사가 없다.
SemanticRequestFingerprintFactory 참조 위치
:::evidence key="adapter-inbound-web-c07" alt="코드베이스에서 SemanticRequestFingerprintFactory 를 검색한 출력 18줄. 이 기록이 세는 참조가 그 출력에 그대로 보인다." caption="SemanticRequestFingerprintFactory 코드베이스 검색 — 18줄 · exit 0" zoom="true" :::
같은 저장소의 다른 다이제스트는 길이 프레이밍을 쓴다
notification NotificationCatalogException.update, messaging의 도메인 분리 상수는 4바이트 길이 프레이밍을 쓰고, 그 이유를 "인접 필드 연결로 인한 충돌이 구조적으로 불가능"으로 적는다. §20.3.