DongHyeonkaandClaude Opus 5
b2963105a8
The keycloak project ended with four open questions that design could not
settle. A two-VM lab was built to answer them by measurement, and this is
that material: 26 experiments, 125 raw command outputs, 22 browser captures.
Follows the import procedure in README.md.
source/ the originating repository verbatim — 78 documents, 28 SVGs,
8 manifests, plus .source-revision recording the commit
final/ the SSOT
document.md 729 lines written from the 29 experiment documents, not
concatenated: what was predicted, what was measured, and
where the measurement itself was wrong
evidence/raw 125 outputs, flattened to <experiment>__<file> because
the originals collided (01-baseline.txt appeared three
times) and the audit only globs the top level
evidence/meta one per raw file; command and exitCode are null and the
README says why rather than inventing them
evidence/browser 22 captures
assets/ three diagrams through techviz
.techviz/ their VizSpecs
A separate project rather than an addition to keycloak: the B-layer answers
that project's four questions, but the A, C and D layers are about cluster
failure, SSO and operations, and one document.md should hold one subject.
The four question records there can point here through 관계.
Recorded rather than papered over: only three of the 28 diagrams were
remade. The repository forbids hand-drawn SVG and forbids titles inside the
canvas; all 28 originals carry both, so converting them is redrawing, not
reformatting. They stay in source/ and the gap is written into the document.
verify-pipeline.py passes. audit-records.py reports no issues.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2.4 KiB
kind, slug, title, topic, project, status, sourceRevision, rootTreeNode, evidenceCapturedOn, assets, evidence, source, module
| kind | slug | title | topic | project | status | sourceRevision | rootTreeNode | evidenceCapturedOn | assets | evidence | source | module | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CONCEPT | adapter-outbound-persistence-jpa-c48 | 레지스트리는 V4에 멈춰 있고 매핑은 V10까지 의존한다 | state-machines-and-ownership | clean-architecture-backend-template | 게시 전 | 21234e38cdb9a926cbc92bb97a2aee2e4a7d2916 | concept:adapter-outbound-persistence-jpa-c48 | 2026-09-01 |
|
|
|
adapter-outbound-persistence-jpa |
레지스트리는 V4에 멈춰 있고 매핑은 V10까지 의존한다
Notification JPA capability는 production opt-in path로 실제 composition된다. 그런데 schema 레지스트리 revision이 V4에서 멈춰 있고 현재 매핑은 V5~V10에서 추가된 column/constraint에 의존한다.
본문
Notification JPA capability는 production opt-in path로 실제 composition된다. PersistenceJpaRootAutoConfiguration이 NotificationJpaPersistenceFacade를 import한다.
PersistenceJpaRootAutoConfiguration 참조 위치
:::evidence key="adapter-outbound-persistence-jpa-c48" alt="코드베이스에서 PersistenceJpaRootAutoConfiguration 를 검색한 출력 10줄. 이 기록이 세는 참조가 그 출력에 그대로 보인다." caption="PersistenceJpaRootAutoConfiguration 코드베이스 검색 — 10줄 · exit 0" zoom="true" :::
조립되는 것
facade가 NotificationJpaPersistenceConfig를 import하고 entity/repository/store bean을 조립한다. application-side worker/config가 recipient lease, reconciliation, provider-event ledger, admin operation store를 실제 소비한다.
레지스트리 revision이 V4에서 멈춰 있다
NotificationSchemaActivation은 capability registry를 읽어 startup activation을 검사한다. schema stream은 V1~V10까지 진화했지만 registry는 V4에서 jpa-notification-platform-v4, feature_revision=4, INSTALLED_INACTIVE를 기록한 뒤 더 이상 revision을 올리지 않는다. 반면 current Java mapping과 SQL은 V5~V10에서 추가된 column/constraint에 실제 의존한다. 이 drift가 §88의 startup false-positive를 만든다.