DongHyeonkaandClaude Opus 5
b2963105a8
The keycloak project ended with four open questions that design could not
settle. A two-VM lab was built to answer them by measurement, and this is
that material: 26 experiments, 125 raw command outputs, 22 browser captures.
Follows the import procedure in README.md.
source/ the originating repository verbatim — 78 documents, 28 SVGs,
8 manifests, plus .source-revision recording the commit
final/ the SSOT
document.md 729 lines written from the 29 experiment documents, not
concatenated: what was predicted, what was measured, and
where the measurement itself was wrong
evidence/raw 125 outputs, flattened to <experiment>__<file> because
the originals collided (01-baseline.txt appeared three
times) and the audit only globs the top level
evidence/meta one per raw file; command and exitCode are null and the
README says why rather than inventing them
evidence/browser 22 captures
assets/ three diagrams through techviz
.techviz/ their VizSpecs
A separate project rather than an addition to keycloak: the B-layer answers
that project's four questions, but the A, C and D layers are about cluster
failure, SSO and operations, and one document.md should hold one subject.
The four question records there can point here through 관계.
Recorded rather than papered over: only three of the 28 diagrams were
remade. The repository forbids hand-drawn SVG and forbids titles inside the
canvas; all 28 originals carry both, so converting them is redrawing, not
reformatting. They stay in source/ and the gap is written into the document.
verify-pipeline.py passes. audit-records.py reports no issues.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
21 lines
1.3 KiB
Plaintext
21 lines
1.3 KiB
Plaintext
=== Q3 검증 2번 — 저장소를 직접 열어 refresh token 이 평문인가 ===
|
|
eyJhbGciOiJIUzUxMiIsInR5cCIgOiAiSldUIiwia2lkIiA6ICJlMmUzZDZkMy0yNzQyLTRhYWItYjk4Ni02ZDU2ZDM5MDk1ZDEifQ.eyJleHAiOjE3ODg1MDA0NDYsImlhdCI6MTc4ODQ5ODY0NiwianRpIjoiNTQwOTZmYTQtZWRjNi1iZjZkLWE4OGMtZDJhNjEzOGJjNmVlIiwiaXNzIjoiaHR0cHM6Ly9hdXRoLmh5ZW9ud29ya3MuY29tL3JlYWxtcy9rZXljbG9hay1wYXR0ZXJucyIsImF1ZCI6I
|
|
|
|
=== access token 도 ===
|
|
eyJhbGciOiJSUzI1NiIsInR5cCIgOiAiSldUIiwia2lkIiA6ICJPWS1jYVlETkdvUDRITUF6LVE5VVBUVS1ETTFpODk2TnV6VVp1NmdmQ3FNIn0.eyJleHAi
|
|
|
|
=== 그 문자열이 실제 JWT 인지 — 헤더를 디코드 ===
|
|
File "<string>", line 3
|
|
h=open(/tmp/hdr.txt).read().strip()
|
|
^
|
|
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
|
|
|
|
=== 저장된 바이트를 그대로 디코드한 결과 ===
|
|
refresh_token 헤더 : {"alg":"HS512","typ" : "JWT","kid" : "e2e3d6d3-2742-4aab-b986-6d56d39095d1"}
|
|
refresh_token 페이로드(앞부분):
|
|
{"exp":1788500446,"iat":1788498646,"jti":"54096fa4-edc6-bf6d-a88c-d2a6138bc6ee","iss":"https://auth.hyeonworks.com/realms/keycloak-patterns"
|
|
access_token 헤더 : {"alg":"RS256","typ" : "JWT","kid" : "OY-caYDNGoP4HMAz-Q9UPTU-DM1i896NuzUZu6gfCqM"}
|
|
|
|
→ bytea 에 들어 있는 것은 암호화된 덩어리가 아니라 JWT 문자열 그대로다.
|
|
DB 읽기 권한만 있으면 그 자리에서 쓸 수 있는 토큰을 얻는다.
|