DongHyeonkaandClaude Opus 5
75bed382c8
The originating repository's SVGs were drawn by hand and every one of them
put a title, a subtitle and an explanation band inside the canvas. This
repository forbids both, so they could not be carried over — the whole set
was rebuilt through the skill's pipeline instead.
Each diagram went through prepare, references, prompt, a VizSpec 1.1 citing
document line ranges, lint, and render. All 28 pass lint and produce the
same eight formats the existing keycloak project has. Sentences moved out of
the canvas into <desc> and the paragraph beside each figure; the drawings
carry names only.
Two lint rules did real work rather than formatting work:
edge-through-node caught arrows crossing an unrelated
node and implying an adjacency that
does not exist — four diagrams had to
be restructured, not just relaid out
evidence-outside-prepared-context caught a diagram citing another
section; its anchor moved from B-0 to
B-1 so all three sections it draws on
are inside the prepared context
lab-topology also had to change profile: its context offers a different
candidate set, and query-fanout with shard roles is what the section
actually shows — one entry point spreading to two Keycloak nodes.
The document now carries all 28 inline, one per claim that needed one, and
the section recording what was still missing is updated: the diagram gap is
closed, Studio records remain.
verify-pipeline.py passes. audit-records.py reports no issues.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
19 lines
478 B
Plaintext
19 lines
478 B
Plaintext
# 백채널 로그아웃은 양쪽이 있어야 한다
|
|
# Question: IdP 쪽만 설정하면 로그아웃이 퍼지는가
|
|
direction: down
|
|
n0: "한 앱에서 로그아웃" {
|
|
shape: person
|
|
}
|
|
n1: "backchannelLogoutUrl" {
|
|
shape: rectangle
|
|
}
|
|
n2: "앱의 수신 엔드포인트" {
|
|
shape: rectangle
|
|
}
|
|
n3: "다른 앱의 세션" {
|
|
shape: rectangle
|
|
}
|
|
n0 -> n1: "통지할 주소를 찾는다"
|
|
n1 -> n2: "주소가 있어야 부른다"
|
|
n2 -> n3: "받을 곳이 있어야 지운다"
|