Files
document-haness/docs/clean-architecture-backend-template/final/evidence/raw/application-core-c02.txt
T
DongHyeonkaandClaude Opus 5 b2963105a8 docs(keycloak-session-store): import the session-storage lab as a new project
The keycloak project ended with four open questions that design could not
settle. A two-VM lab was built to answer them by measurement, and this is
that material: 26 experiments, 125 raw command outputs, 22 browser captures.

Follows the import procedure in README.md.

  source/     the originating repository verbatim — 78 documents, 28 SVGs,
              8 manifests, plus .source-revision recording the commit
  final/      the SSOT
    document.md   729 lines written from the 29 experiment documents, not
                  concatenated: what was predicted, what was measured, and
                  where the measurement itself was wrong
    evidence/raw    125 outputs, flattened to <experiment>__<file> because
                    the originals collided (01-baseline.txt appeared three
                    times) and the audit only globs the top level
    evidence/meta   one per raw file; command and exitCode are null and the
                    README says why rather than inventing them
    evidence/browser  22 captures
    assets/       three diagrams through techviz
    .techviz/     their VizSpecs

A separate project rather than an addition to keycloak: the B-layer answers
that project's four questions, but the A, C and D layers are about cluster
failure, SSO and operations, and one document.md should hold one subject.
The four question records there can point here through 관계.

Recorded rather than papered over: only three of the 28 diagrams were
remade. The repository forbids hand-drawn SVG and forbids titles inside the
canvas; all 28 originals carry both, so converting them is redrawing, not
reformatting. They stay in source/ and the gap is written into the document.

verify-pipeline.py passes. audit-records.py reports no issues.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-04 22:51:59 +09:00

29 lines
5.2 KiB
Plaintext

./application-core/src/main/java/dev/caskeleton/application/security/AuthorizationDeniedException.java:6: * Raised by {@link AuthorizationPort} when an authenticated caller lacks a required {@link
./application-core/src/main/java/dev/caskeleton/application/security/RequiresPermission.java:16: * {@link AuthorizationPort}. See README for the AOP-proxy bypass caveat and where it is required.
./application-core/src/main/java/dev/caskeleton/application/security/AuthorizationPrincipal.java:8: * Framework-free view of the authenticated caller consumed by {@link AuthorizationPort}: the IdP
./application-core/src/main/java/dev/caskeleton/application/security/ObjectAccessPolicy.java:11: * <p>Distinct from {@link AuthorizationPort}, which answers "may this caller perform this kind of
./application-core/src/main/java/dev/caskeleton/application/security/AuthorizationPort.java:13:public interface AuthorizationPort {
./app-bootstrap/src/test/java/dev/caskeleton/bootstrap/architecture/CleanArchitectureTest.java:688: + "DECISION is a framework-free port (@RequiresPermission / AuthorizationPort / "
./app-bootstrap/src/test/java/dev/caskeleton/bootstrap/architecture/CleanArchitectureTest.java:911: // authorization contract consumed by AuthorizationPort.
./app-bootstrap/src/test/java/dev/caskeleton/bootstrap/activation/StartupWarningZeroTest.java:17: * resolved {@code AuthorizationPort} while BeanPostProcessors were still registering, so three
./shared-contract/src/main/java/dev/caskeleton/shared/security/Permission.java:8: * AuthorizationPort} contract consumes; lives in {@code shared-contract} so the application layer
./sample-portfolio/src/test/java/dev/caskeleton/sample/portfolio/authz/WorkLogAuthorizationContractTest.java:58: * {@code @RequiresPermission} → {@code AuthorizationPort} → {@code RolePermissionRegistry} path
./adapter/inbound/web/src/test/java/dev/caskeleton/adapter/inbound/web/authz/RequiresPermissionAuthorizationManagerTest.java:10:import dev.caskeleton.application.security.AuthorizationPort;
./adapter/inbound/web/src/test/java/dev/caskeleton/adapter/inbound/web/authz/RequiresPermissionAuthorizationManagerTest.java:29: private final AuthorizationPort port =
./adapter/inbound/web/src/main/java/dev/caskeleton/adapter/inbound/web/authz/MethodSecurityConfig.java:3:import dev.caskeleton.application.security.AuthorizationPort;
./adapter/inbound/web/src/main/java/dev/caskeleton/adapter/inbound/web/authz/MethodSecurityConfig.java:34: * registered. Taking {@code AuthorizationPort} directly made Spring instantiate it — and with it
./adapter/inbound/web/src/main/java/dev/caskeleton/adapter/inbound/web/authz/MethodSecurityConfig.java:51: ObjectProvider<AuthorizationPort> authorizationPort) {
./adapter/inbound/web/src/main/java/dev/caskeleton/adapter/inbound/web/authz/AuthorizationAdapter.java:4:import dev.caskeleton.application.security.AuthorizationPort;
./adapter/inbound/web/src/main/java/dev/caskeleton/adapter/inbound/web/authz/AuthorizationAdapter.java:11: * Web-adapter implementation of the application {@link AuthorizationPort}.
./adapter/inbound/web/src/main/java/dev/caskeleton/adapter/inbound/web/authz/AuthorizationAdapter.java:18:public class AuthorizationAdapter implements AuthorizationPort {
./adapter/inbound/web/src/main/java/dev/caskeleton/adapter/inbound/web/authz/RequiresPermissionAuthorizationManager.java:5:import dev.caskeleton.application.security.AuthorizationPort;
./adapter/inbound/web/src/main/java/dev/caskeleton/adapter/inbound/web/authz/RequiresPermissionAuthorizationManager.java:25: * AuthorizationPrincipal}, and delegates the decision to the application {@link AuthorizationPort}.
./adapter/inbound/web/src/main/java/dev/caskeleton/adapter/inbound/web/authz/RequiresPermissionAuthorizationManager.java:32: private final Supplier<AuthorizationPort> authorizationPort;
./adapter/inbound/web/src/main/java/dev/caskeleton/adapter/inbound/web/authz/RequiresPermissionAuthorizationManager.java:42: public RequiresPermissionAuthorizationManager(Supplier<AuthorizationPort> authorizationPort) {
./adapter/inbound/graphql/src/test/java/dev/caskeleton/adapter/inbound/graphql/security/GraphQlAuthorizationPolicyTest.java:96: GraphQlObjectAuthorizationPort port =
./adapter/inbound/graphql/src/main/java/dev/caskeleton/adapter/inbound/graphql/security/ApplicationObjectAuthorization.java:27:public final class ApplicationObjectAuthorization implements GraphQlObjectAuthorizationPort {
./adapter/inbound/graphql/src/main/java/dev/caskeleton/adapter/inbound/graphql/security/GraphQlObjectAuthorizationPort.java:24:public interface GraphQlObjectAuthorizationPort {
./adapter/inbound/graphql/src/main/java/dev/caskeleton/adapter/inbound/graphql/security/GraphQlAuthorizationPolicy.java:18: * <p>Object-level access is delegated to {@link GraphQlObjectAuthorizationPort}, because it needs
./adapter/inbound/graphql/src/testFixtures/java/dev/caskeleton/adapter/inbound/graphql/testkit/GraphQlSecurityContractSuite.java:7:import dev.caskeleton.adapter.inbound.graphql.security.GraphQlObjectAuthorizationPort;
./adapter/inbound/graphql/src/testFixtures/java/dev/caskeleton/adapter/inbound/graphql/testkit/GraphQlSecurityContractSuite.java:35: GraphQlObjectAuthorizationPort objectAuthorization,