DongHyeonkaandClaude Opus 5
b2963105a8
The keycloak project ended with four open questions that design could not
settle. A two-VM lab was built to answer them by measurement, and this is
that material: 26 experiments, 125 raw command outputs, 22 browser captures.
Follows the import procedure in README.md.
source/ the originating repository verbatim — 78 documents, 28 SVGs,
8 manifests, plus .source-revision recording the commit
final/ the SSOT
document.md 729 lines written from the 29 experiment documents, not
concatenated: what was predicted, what was measured, and
where the measurement itself was wrong
evidence/raw 125 outputs, flattened to <experiment>__<file> because
the originals collided (01-baseline.txt appeared three
times) and the audit only globs the top level
evidence/meta one per raw file; command and exitCode are null and the
README says why rather than inventing them
evidence/browser 22 captures
assets/ three diagrams through techviz
.techviz/ their VizSpecs
A separate project rather than an addition to keycloak: the B-layer answers
that project's four questions, but the A, C and D layers are about cluster
failure, SSO and operations, and one document.md should hold one subject.
The four question records there can point here through 관계.
Recorded rather than papered over: only three of the 28 diagrams were
remade. The repository forbids hand-drawn SVG and forbids titles inside the
canvas; all 28 originals carry both, so converting them is redrawing, not
reformatting. They stay in source/ and the gap is written into the document.
verify-pipeline.py passes. audit-records.py reports no issues.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2.2 KiB
2.2 KiB
kind, slug, title, topic, project, status, sourceRevision, rootTreeNode, evidenceCapturedOn, assets, evidence, source, module
| kind | slug | title | topic | project | status | sourceRevision | rootTreeNode | evidenceCapturedOn | assets | evidence | source | module | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CONCEPT | messaging-reliability-api-c04 | Outbox에 행을 쓰는 진입점만 구현이 없다 | state-machines-and-ownership | clean-architecture-backend-template | 게시 전 | 21234e38cdb9a926cbc92bb97a2aee2e4a7d2916 | concept:messaging-reliability-api-c04 | 2026-09-01 |
|
|
|
messaging-reliability-api |
Outbox에 행을 쓰는 진입점만 구현이 없다
세 실행 경로가 있고 그중 Outbox 쓰기의 진입점만 구현이 없다.
관계
- 계약만 담는 leaf도 계약의 거절 조건은 자기 레인에서 검증한다 같은 분석 리프에서 끌어낸 규칙이다.
- record의
equals를 좁히면 이유를 적는다 같은 분석 리프에서 끌어낸 규칙이다. - 호출 컨텍스트가 계약이면 그 컨텍스트를 검증할 수단을 함께 정한다 같은 분석 리프에서 끌어낸 규칙이다.
본문
Outbox 쓰기 — 애플리케이션 트랜잭션 안에서 ReliableMessagePublisher.addToOutbox(...) → OutboxRepository.append(record). 이 진입점의 구현이 없다(§12.1).
Outbox 릴레이 — claimBatch(owner, size, lease, now, maxAttempts) → List<OutboxLease> → 각 lease에 대해 발행 → 결과에 따라 markPublished/markAmbiguous/markExhausted/markFailed(lease 기반) → APPLIED면 정상, STALE_LEASE면 다른 릴레이가 가져감.
Inbox — handleOnce(consumerName, delivery, action) → 한 트랜잭션 안에서 reserve(messageId, consumerId, now) → true면 action.apply(delivery) → 커밋.
이 기록이 다루는 파일 범위
:::evidence key="messaging-reliability-api-c04" alt="코드베이스에서 파일 목록을 만든 출력 13줄. 이 기록이 다루는 범위가 그 목록이다." caption="코드베이스 파일 목록 — 13줄 · exit 0" zoom="true" :::