Files
document-haness/docs/clean-architecture-backend-template/final/evidence/raw/adapter-inbound-web-c19.txt
T
DongHyeonkaandClaude Opus 5 b2963105a8 docs(keycloak-session-store): import the session-storage lab as a new project
The keycloak project ended with four open questions that design could not
settle. A two-VM lab was built to answer them by measurement, and this is
that material: 26 experiments, 125 raw command outputs, 22 browser captures.

Follows the import procedure in README.md.

  source/     the originating repository verbatim — 78 documents, 28 SVGs,
              8 manifests, plus .source-revision recording the commit
  final/      the SSOT
    document.md   729 lines written from the 29 experiment documents, not
                  concatenated: what was predicted, what was measured, and
                  where the measurement itself was wrong
    evidence/raw    125 outputs, flattened to <experiment>__<file> because
                    the originals collided (01-baseline.txt appeared three
                    times) and the audit only globs the top level
    evidence/meta   one per raw file; command and exitCode are null and the
                    README says why rather than inventing them
    evidence/browser  22 captures
    assets/       three diagrams through techviz
    .techviz/     their VizSpecs

A separate project rather than an addition to keycloak: the B-layer answers
that project's four questions, but the A, C and D layers are about cluster
failure, SSO and operations, and one document.md should hold one subject.
The four question records there can point here through 관계.

Recorded rather than papered over: only three of the 28 diagrams were
remade. The repository forbids hand-drawn SVG and forbids titles inside the
canvas; all 28 originals carry both, so converting them is redrawing, not
reformatting. They stay in source/ and the gap is written into the document.

verify-pipeline.py passes. audit-records.py reports no issues.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-04 22:51:59 +09:00

16 lines
907 B
Plaintext

### 47.2 (8.2) 조건 형제 비교 — 두 개의 계약 강제 형태
| | notification `ProviderAdapterContract` | web `WebBudgetContract` 외 6종 |
|---|---|---|
| 강제 수단 | 상속(강제 없음) | 소스셋 + `dependsOn` 태스크 그래프 |
| 실제 적용 | 8종 중 3종 | 세 런타임 전부 |
| 빠진 것을 잡는 장치 | 없음 | `webCrossStackParityTest`가 세 기록을 비교하고, 하나라도 없으면 실패 |
web 쪽이 구조적으로 우월하다. `build.gradle`이 그 이유를 적는다 — "a parity check that compares whatever happens to be present would report agreement across a matrix with a hole in it."
### 47.3 (8.3) 중복 메커니즘 — 없음
`WebArchitectureRules`가 유일한 규칙 팩이고 소비자가 둘(자기 테스트 + app-bootstrap 프로덕션 적용)이다. 계약 클래스도 각 능력당 하나다.
### 47.4 (8.4) 카운트 고정