Files
document-haness/docs/clean-architecture-backend-template/final/evidence/meta/a05-f005-jparetrypolicy.json
T
DongHyeonkaandClaude Opus 5 b2963105a8 docs(keycloak-session-store): import the session-storage lab as a new project
The keycloak project ended with four open questions that design could not
settle. A two-VM lab was built to answer them by measurement, and this is
that material: 26 experiments, 125 raw command outputs, 22 browser captures.

Follows the import procedure in README.md.

  source/     the originating repository verbatim — 78 documents, 28 SVGs,
              8 manifests, plus .source-revision recording the commit
  final/      the SSOT
    document.md   729 lines written from the 29 experiment documents, not
                  concatenated: what was predicted, what was measured, and
                  where the measurement itself was wrong
    evidence/raw    125 outputs, flattened to <experiment>__<file> because
                    the originals collided (01-baseline.txt appeared three
                    times) and the audit only globs the top level
    evidence/meta   one per raw file; command and exitCode are null and the
                    README says why rather than inventing them
    evidence/browser  22 captures
    assets/       three diagrams through techviz
    .techviz/     their VizSpecs

A separate project rather than an addition to keycloak: the B-layer answers
that project's four questions, but the A, C and D layers are about cluster
failure, SSO and operations, and one document.md should hold one subject.
The four question records there can point here through 관계.

Recorded rather than papered over: only three of the 28 diagrams were
remade. The repository forbids hand-drawn SVG and forbids titles inside the
canvas; all 28 originals carry both, so converting them is redrawing, not
reformatting. They stay in source/ and the gap is written into the document.

verify-pipeline.py passes. audit-records.py reports no issues.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-04 22:51:59 +09:00

15 lines
1.6 KiB
JSON

{
"assetKey": "a05-f005-jparetrypolicy",
"kind": "terminal",
"command": "A=app-bootstrap/src/main/java/dev/caskeleton/bootstrap/autoconfigure/jpa/JpaTransactionAutoConfiguration.java\nC=adapter/outbound/persistence-jpa/src/main/java/dev/caskeleton/adapter/outbound/persistence/transaction/FullTransactionRetryCoordinator.java\nP=adapter/outbound/persistence-jpa/src/main/java/dev/caskeleton/adapter/outbound/persistence/api/transaction/TransactionProfile.java\n\necho '# 조립 팩토리 둘. 앞의 것이 왜 그렇게 만드는지 적혀 있다.'\nsed -n '91,111p' $A\n\necho\necho '# 뒤의 오버로드가 넘긴 정책이 담기는 필드'\nsed -n '34,43p' $C\necho '# 그 필드를 읽는 유일한 자리'\nsed -n '88,94p' $C\necho '# 그런데 프로파일 타입이 그 조건을 금지한다'\nsed -n '26,30p' $P\n\necho\necho '# retryCoordinator( 호출 전수 (선언 제외)'\ngrep -rn 'retryCoordinator(' --include=*.java . | grep -v 'public FullTransactionRetryCoordinator' | sed 's|^\\./||'\necho '# 코디네이터를 직접 생성하는 곳과 그때 넘기는 정책'\ngrep -rn -A2 'new FullTransactionRetryCoordinator(' --include=*.java . | grep 'policy\\|RetryPolicy' | sed 's|^\\./||' ",
"cwd": "/shared/codebase/clean-architecture-backend-template/src",
"exitCode": 0,
"executedAt": "2026-09-02T03:30:06+00:00",
"sourceRevision": "21234e38cdb9a926cbc92bb97a2aee2e4a7d2916",
"raw": "evidence/raw/a05-f005-jparetrypolicy.txt",
"svg": "evidence/rendered/a05-f005-jparetrypolicy.svg",
"rawSha256": "3fdb1881743d716d924c4efe0df052d8745fa8942e0887f3227cef9d9d3dfa0d",
"lines": 55,
"redaction": "none — 출력에 자격증명이 없다"
}