Files
document-haness/docs/clean-architecture-backend-template/final/evidence/raw/grpc-advanced-streaming-f01.txt
T
DongHyeonkaandClaude Opus 5 b2963105a8 docs(keycloak-session-store): import the session-storage lab as a new project
The keycloak project ended with four open questions that design could not
settle. A two-VM lab was built to answer them by measurement, and this is
that material: 26 experiments, 125 raw command outputs, 22 browser captures.

Follows the import procedure in README.md.

  source/     the originating repository verbatim — 78 documents, 28 SVGs,
              8 manifests, plus .source-revision recording the commit
  final/      the SSOT
    document.md   729 lines written from the 29 experiment documents, not
                  concatenated: what was predicted, what was measured, and
                  where the measurement itself was wrong
    evidence/raw    125 outputs, flattened to <experiment>__<file> because
                    the originals collided (01-baseline.txt appeared three
                    times) and the audit only globs the top level
    evidence/meta   one per raw file; command and exitCode are null and the
                    README says why rather than inventing them
    evidence/browser  22 captures
    assets/       three diagrams through techviz
    .techviz/     their VizSpecs

A separate project rather than an addition to keycloak: the B-layer answers
that project's four questions, but the A, C and D layers are about cluster
failure, SSO and operations, and one document.md should hold one subject.
The four question records there can point here through 관계.

Recorded rather than papered over: only three of the 28 diagrams were
remade. The repository forbids hand-drawn SVG and forbids titles inside the
canvas; all 28 originals carry both, so converting them is redrawing, not
reformatting. They stay in source/ and the gap is written into the document.

verify-pipeline.py passes. audit-records.py reports no issues.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-04 22:51:59 +09:00

16 lines
836 B
Plaintext

### 17.1 P3 — 클래스가 비판한 무제한 증가를 형제 맵이 그대로 한다
클래스 javadoc 이 집합 방식을 거부한 이유가 무제한 증가다 — "A set grows without bound for the life of a session".
체크포인트는 그 비판을 지킨다. 세션당 항목 하나이고 순번만 앞으로 간다.
형제 맵은 지키지 않는다.
```java
private final ConcurrentMap<String, String> replayableOutcomes = new ConcurrentHashMap<>();
public void recordApplied(GrpcClientStreamMessage<?> message, String outcomeReference, Instant at) {
checkpoints.put(message.sessionId().value(), checkpoint.advancedTo(message.sequence(), at));
if (outcomeReference != null && !outcomeReference.isBlank()) {
replayableOutcomes.put(message.dedupKey(), outcomeReference); // ← 메시지마다 한 항목