The keycloak project ended with four open questions that design could not
settle. A two-VM lab was built to answer them by measurement, and this is
that material: 26 experiments, 125 raw command outputs, 22 browser captures.
Follows the import procedure in README.md.
source/ the originating repository verbatim — 78 documents, 28 SVGs,
8 manifests, plus .source-revision recording the commit
final/ the SSOT
document.md 729 lines written from the 29 experiment documents, not
concatenated: what was predicted, what was measured, and
where the measurement itself was wrong
evidence/raw 125 outputs, flattened to <experiment>__<file> because
the originals collided (01-baseline.txt appeared three
times) and the audit only globs the top level
evidence/meta one per raw file; command and exitCode are null and the
README says why rather than inventing them
evidence/browser 22 captures
assets/ three diagrams through techviz
.techviz/ their VizSpecs
A separate project rather than an addition to keycloak: the B-layer answers
that project's four questions, but the A, C and D layers are about cluster
failure, SSO and operations, and one document.md should hold one subject.
The four question records there can point here through 관계.
Recorded rather than papered over: only three of the 28 diagrams were
remade. The repository forbids hand-drawn SVG and forbids titles inside the
canvas; all 28 originals carry both, so converting them is redrawing, not
reformatting. They stay in source/ and the gap is written into the document.
verify-pipeline.py passes. audit-records.py reports no issues.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
15 lines
1.5 KiB
JSON
15 lines
1.5 KiB
JSON
{
|
|
"assetKey": "a05-f004-retrydecision-reason-probe",
|
|
"kind": "terminal",
|
|
"command": "T=adapter/outbound/persistence-jpa/src/main/java/dev/caskeleton/adapter/outbound/persistence/transaction\nO=adapter/outbound/persistence-jpa/src/main/java/dev/caskeleton/adapter/outbound/persistence/observation\n\necho '# 프로덕션이 실제로 내는 사유 전수'\ngrep -n 'retryable persistence failure' adapter/outbound/persistence-jpa/src/main/java/dev/caskeleton/adapter/outbound/persistence/api/transaction/RetryDecision.java\ngrep -n 'RetryDecision\\.\\(fail\\|reconcile\\|retry\\)(' -A2 $T/DefaultJpaRetryPolicy.java | grep '\"'\n\necho\necho '# 같은 모듈이 저카디널리티를 이미 정의해 뒀다'\nsed -n '12,20p' $O/LowCardinality.java\nsed -n '24,34p' $O/LowCardinality.java\n\necho\necho '# 그 사유들을 그 가드에 실제로 넣어 본다'\nCP=adapter/outbound/persistence-jpa/build/classes/java/main\njavac -encoding UTF-8 -cp $CP -d /tmp/ed/probe /tmp/ed/ReasonProbe.java \\\n && java -Dstdout.encoding=UTF-8 -cp $CP:/tmp/ed/probe ReasonProbe",
|
|
"cwd": "/shared/codebase/clean-architecture-backend-template/src",
|
|
"exitCode": 0,
|
|
"executedAt": "2026-09-02T03:27:21+00:00",
|
|
"sourceRevision": "21234e38cdb9a926cbc92bb97a2aee2e4a7d2916",
|
|
"raw": "evidence/raw/a05-f004-retrydecision-reason-probe.txt",
|
|
"svg": "evidence/rendered/a05-f004-retrydecision-reason-probe.svg",
|
|
"rawSha256": "dd1a3bf67f1ab2cb62a3f64c4a94b17dd6ea4acfa88b0886bb65e52717a9a2fd",
|
|
"lines": 41,
|
|
"redaction": "none — 코드베이스 정적 검색"
|
|
}
|