The keycloak project ended with four open questions that design could not
settle. A two-VM lab was built to answer them by measurement, and this is
that material: 26 experiments, 125 raw command outputs, 22 browser captures.
Follows the import procedure in README.md.
source/ the originating repository verbatim — 78 documents, 28 SVGs,
8 manifests, plus .source-revision recording the commit
final/ the SSOT
document.md 729 lines written from the 29 experiment documents, not
concatenated: what was predicted, what was measured, and
where the measurement itself was wrong
evidence/raw 125 outputs, flattened to <experiment>__<file> because
the originals collided (01-baseline.txt appeared three
times) and the audit only globs the top level
evidence/meta one per raw file; command and exitCode are null and the
README says why rather than inventing them
evidence/browser 22 captures
assets/ three diagrams through techviz
.techviz/ their VizSpecs
A separate project rather than an addition to keycloak: the B-layer answers
that project's four questions, but the A, C and D layers are about cluster
failure, SSO and operations, and one document.md should hold one subject.
The four question records there can point here through 관계.
Recorded rather than papered over: only three of the 28 diagrams were
remade. The repository forbids hand-drawn SVG and forbids titles inside the
canvas; all 28 originals carry both, so converting them is redrawing, not
reformatting. They stay in source/ and the gap is written into the document.
verify-pipeline.py passes. audit-records.py reports no issues.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
15 lines
1.8 KiB
JSON
15 lines
1.8 KiB
JSON
{
|
|
"assetKey": "a05-f004-retrydecision-reason",
|
|
"kind": "terminal",
|
|
"command": "J=adapter/outbound/persistence-jpa/src/main/java/dev/caskeleton/adapter/outbound/persistence/api/transaction\nT=adapter/outbound/persistence-jpa/src/main/java/dev/caskeleton/adapter/outbound/persistence/transaction\nO=adapter/outbound/persistence-jpa/src/main/java/dev/caskeleton/adapter/outbound/persistence/observation\n\necho '# 사유 필드와 그 문서'\nsed -n '6,12p' $J/RetryDecision.java\necho '# 컴팩트 생성자가 검사하는 것 전부'\nsed -n '14,27p' $J/RetryDecision.java\necho '# 공개 팩토리 넷. 사유를 인자로 받는 것은 셋이다.'\ngrep -n 'public static RetryDecision' $J/RetryDecision.java\necho -n '# 이 파일에서 길이·어휘·형식을 검사하는 코드: '\ngrep -c 'length()\\|matches(\\|Set.of(\\|enum' $J/RetryDecision.java\n\necho\necho '# 이 타입을 소비하는 main 파일 전부'\nFILES=$(grep -rl 'persistence.api.transaction.RetryDecision' --include=*.java . | grep '/main/')\necho \"$FILES\" | sed 's|.*/||'\necho -n '# 그중 reason() 을 읽는 줄: '\ngrep -rn '\\.reason()' $FILES | wc -l\n\necho\necho '# 그런데 결정 객체 자체는 메트릭을 내는 곳까지 간다'\ngrep -n 'listener.onAttemptFailed' $T/FullTransactionRetryCoordinator.java\ngrep -n 'LowCardinality.requireRegistered\\|\\.tag(' $O/JpaRetryObservation.java",
|
|
"cwd": "/shared/codebase/clean-architecture-backend-template/src",
|
|
"exitCode": 0,
|
|
"executedAt": "2026-09-02T03:27:20+00:00",
|
|
"sourceRevision": "21234e38cdb9a926cbc92bb97a2aee2e4a7d2916",
|
|
"raw": "evidence/raw/a05-f004-retrydecision-reason.txt",
|
|
"svg": "evidence/rendered/a05-f004-retrydecision-reason.svg",
|
|
"rawSha256": "b99dd4894928172f41b66c3bd9eb7e83fe031c33d7d79f92a4d13c4fe5131ee2",
|
|
"lines": 40,
|
|
"redaction": "none — 출력에 자격증명이 없다"
|
|
}
|