DongHyeonkaandClaude Opus 5
b2963105a8
The keycloak project ended with four open questions that design could not
settle. A two-VM lab was built to answer them by measurement, and this is
that material: 26 experiments, 125 raw command outputs, 22 browser captures.
Follows the import procedure in README.md.
source/ the originating repository verbatim — 78 documents, 28 SVGs,
8 manifests, plus .source-revision recording the commit
final/ the SSOT
document.md 729 lines written from the 29 experiment documents, not
concatenated: what was predicted, what was measured, and
where the measurement itself was wrong
evidence/raw 125 outputs, flattened to <experiment>__<file> because
the originals collided (01-baseline.txt appeared three
times) and the audit only globs the top level
evidence/meta one per raw file; command and exitCode are null and the
README says why rather than inventing them
evidence/browser 22 captures
assets/ three diagrams through techviz
.techviz/ their VizSpecs
A separate project rather than an addition to keycloak: the B-layer answers
that project's four questions, but the A, C and D layers are about cluster
failure, SSO and operations, and one document.md should hold one subject.
The four question records there can point here through 관계.
Recorded rather than papered over: only three of the 28 diagrams were
remade. The repository forbids hand-drawn SVG and forbids titles inside the
canvas; all 28 originals carry both, so converting them is redrawing, not
reformatting. They stay in source/ and the gap is written into the document.
verify-pipeline.py passes. audit-records.py reports no issues.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
26 lines
1.9 KiB
Plaintext
26 lines
1.9 KiB
Plaintext
# command: ./gradlew :messaging:messaging-rabbit:test --rerun-tasks --console=plain
|
|
# revision: 21234e38cdb9a926cbc92bb97a2aee2e4a7d2916
|
|
# exit: 0
|
|
|
|
BUILD SUCCESSFUL in 16s
|
|
28 actionable tasks: 28 executed
|
|
|
|
name="dev.caskeleton.messaging.rabbit.RabbitAdapterContractTest$Contract" tests="7" skipped="0" failures="0" errors="0" [공유 계약]
|
|
name="dev.caskeleton.messaging.rabbit.RabbitBrokerIT" tests="4" skipped="0" failures="0" errors="0" [컨테이너]
|
|
name="dev.caskeleton.messaging.rabbit.RabbitConfirmCoordinatorTest" tests="11" skipped="0" failures="0" errors="0"
|
|
name="dev.caskeleton.messaging.rabbit.RabbitEnvelopeRoundTripTest" tests="6" skipped="0" failures="0" errors="0"
|
|
name="dev.caskeleton.messaging.rabbit.RabbitProfileValidatorTest" tests="7" skipped="0" failures="0" errors="0"
|
|
name="dev.caskeleton.messaging.rabbit.RabbitRuntimeTest" tests="14" skipped="0" failures="0" errors="0"
|
|
name="dev.caskeleton.messaging.rabbit.RabbitSettlementControllerTest" tests="5" skipped="0" failures="0" errors="0"
|
|
name="dev.caskeleton.messaging.rabbit.RabbitTopologyAndBatchTest" tests="17" skipped="0" failures="0" errors="0"
|
|
TOTAL tests=71 failures=0 errors=0 skipped=0
|
|
|
|
# RabbitAdapterContractTest$Contract 7건 = messaging-testkit 의 MessagingAdapterContract 7개.
|
|
# => rabbit 은 공유 어댑터 계약을 전부 통과한다. CompatibilityMatrix 의 runsSharedContract=true 는 정확하다.
|
|
# RabbitBrokerIT 4건이 실제 RabbitMQ 컨테이너에 대해 실행되었다(skipped=0).
|
|
#
|
|
# 인증 레인 없음: messaging-rabbit 에는 messagingCertificationTest 가 없다.
|
|
# CompatibilityMatrix 의 rabbit 주석이 그것을 정확히 서술한다:
|
|
# "Stable in this repository means fault evidence, and there is none: connection-refused,
|
|
# cut-after-write, confirm-timeout, settlement-lost and high-latency have never been executed here."
|