Files
document-haness/docs/clean-architecture-backend-template/final/evidence/raw/capability-constant-outlives-its-condition.txt
T
DongHyeonkaandClaude Opus 5 b2963105a8 docs(keycloak-session-store): import the session-storage lab as a new project
The keycloak project ended with four open questions that design could not
settle. A two-VM lab was built to answer them by measurement, and this is
that material: 26 experiments, 125 raw command outputs, 22 browser captures.

Follows the import procedure in README.md.

  source/     the originating repository verbatim — 78 documents, 28 SVGs,
              8 manifests, plus .source-revision recording the commit
  final/      the SSOT
    document.md   729 lines written from the 29 experiment documents, not
                  concatenated: what was predicted, what was measured, and
                  where the measurement itself was wrong
    evidence/raw    125 outputs, flattened to <experiment>__<file> because
                    the originals collided (01-baseline.txt appeared three
                    times) and the audit only globs the top level
    evidence/meta   one per raw file; command and exitCode are null and the
                    README says why rather than inventing them
    evidence/browser  22 captures
    assets/       three diagrams through techviz
    .techviz/     their VizSpecs

A separate project rather than an addition to keycloak: the B-layer answers
that project's four questions, but the A, C and D layers are about cluster
failure, SSO and operations, and one document.md should hold one subject.
The four question records there can point here through 관계.

Recorded rather than papered over: only three of the 28 diagrams were
remade. The repository forbids hand-drawn SVG and forbids titles inside the
canvas; all 28 originals carry both, so converting them is redrawing, not
reformatting. They stay in source/ and the gap is written into the document.

verify-pipeline.py passes. audit-records.py reports no issues.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-04 22:51:59 +09:00

16 lines
1.3 KiB
Plaintext

## 10. 테스트 레인
두 테스트 460줄 · 28개.
`NatsAdapterContractTest` 17개 — 지속 증거(`REPLICATION_OR_PERSISTENCE_ACK`), 위치 반환, 시간 초과의 모호 판정, 사전 거절만이 `NOT_TRANSMITTED` 라는 것, 감싸인 미지 실패의 모호 판정, 호출자 마감의 유효성, 중복 제거 식별자 유무, 초과 페이로드 거절, 능력 두 개, 닫힌 전송, 재배달 인식, 순번 하한, 실패 범주.
전송은 `(subject, deduplicationId, request) -> CompletionStage<NatsStreamPosition>` 람다로 주입된다. 실제 JetStream 클라이언트는 이 리프에 없고, 테스트가 성공·실패·영영 안 끝남을 직접 만든다.
두 테스트가 회귀를 이름으로 기록한다 — `aFailureNamedLikeAKnownOneIsStillAmbiguous` 는 "예외 클래스 이름이 분류자였던" 과거를, `aPublishThatNeverCompletesIsBoundedByTheCallersTimeout` 은 "호출자 마감이 아예 무시되던" 과거를 주석에 남긴다. 셋째 회귀 기록은 어셈블이 비어 있다(§17.4).
`NatsMaxDeliverParkingTest` 11개 — 한계 직전 주차, 한계 자체도 주차, 한계 초과의 `ALREADY_TERMINATED`, 확인 뒤 정착, `maxDeliver=1` 거부, 배달 수 하한, 임계값, `ackMode` 세 값.
`NatsJetStreamProfileValidator` 를 세우는 테스트는 없다.
## 12. negative-space probes