Files
document-haness/docs/clean-architecture-backend-template/final/evidence/raw/complete-drain-rolls-back-a-rotation.txt
T
DongHyeonkaandClaude Opus 5 b2963105a8 docs(keycloak-session-store): import the session-storage lab as a new project
The keycloak project ended with four open questions that design could not
settle. A two-VM lab was built to answer them by measurement, and this is
that material: 26 experiments, 125 raw command outputs, 22 browser captures.

Follows the import procedure in README.md.

  source/     the originating repository verbatim — 78 documents, 28 SVGs,
              8 manifests, plus .source-revision recording the commit
  final/      the SSOT
    document.md   729 lines written from the 29 experiment documents, not
                  concatenated: what was predicted, what was measured, and
                  where the measurement itself was wrong
    evidence/raw    125 outputs, flattened to <experiment>__<file> because
                    the originals collided (01-baseline.txt appeared three
                    times) and the audit only globs the top level
    evidence/meta   one per raw file; command and exitCode are null and the
                    README says why rather than inventing them
    evidence/browser  22 captures
    assets/       three diagrams through techviz
    .techviz/     their VizSpecs

A separate project rather than an addition to keycloak: the B-layer answers
that project's four questions, but the A, C and D layers are about cluster
failure, SSO and operations, and one document.md should hold one subject.
The four question records there can point here through 관계.

Recorded rather than papered over: only three of the 28 diagrams were
remade. The repository forbids hand-drawn SVG and forbids titles inside the
canvas; all 28 originals carry both, so converting them is redrawing, not
reformatting. They stay in source/ and the gap is written into the document.

verify-pipeline.py passes. audit-records.py reports no issues.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-04 22:51:59 +09:00

16 lines
1.3 KiB
Plaintext

```
같은 뜻의 세 번째 플래그가 `GrpcStreamLifecycleCoordinator.drainSignalled` 인데 여기에는 `volatile` 이 없다(§17.6). 같은 저장소가 같은 문제를 두 번은 표시하고 한 번은 표시하지 않았다.
**12.4 드리프트.** build.gradle 이 서술한 아홉 주제가 전부 패키지로 존재한다. 파일 수의 분포는 균등하지 않다 — `streaming` 하나가 main 의 30%(19/62)다.
**12.5 테스트가 볼 수 없는 것.** 세 곳에서 테스트의 형태가 결함을 구조적으로 가린다.
| 결함 | 가리는 형태 |
|---|---|
| §17.4 DROP_OLDEST 바이트 계산 | `writer(policy, messageSize)` 가 `() -> messageSize` 상수 크기 공급자를 넘긴다. 모든 메시지가 같은 크기면 잘못 뺀 값과 옳은 값이 같다 |
| §17.1 승인 경계 경합 | `streamAdmissionBoundsTotalAndPerCaller` 가 단일 스레드다 |
| §17.6 배수 신호 가시성 | `aDrainOutranksTheTimers` 가 `signalDrain()` 과 `terminationDue()` 를 같은 스레드에서 부른다 |
**12.6 설정처럼 보이지만 상수인 것.** `GrpcContextPropagationPolicy.clearAfterTask` 는 두 값을 받는 성분인데 생성자가 `false` 를 무조건 거부한다. 합법 값이 하나뿐이고, 그 값을 읽는 production 코드도 없다(§17.8).