DongHyeonkaandClaude Opus 5
95c0e680b5
The skill says drawings carry names and sentences go in <desc> and the paragraph beside the figure. I put sentences in node details and edge labels instead, and 27 of the 28 diagrams shipped with prose inside the canvas — "예측 다섯 개가 틀렸다", "아홉 번 조용히 실패했다", "막혀서 닿지 않는다". Only label and details render on the canvas; description does not. So every sentence moved to a noun phrase and the meaning stays in description, which was already carrying it. 막혀서 닿지 않는다 -> 차단 아홉 번 조용히 실패했다 -> 조용한 실패 9건 예측 다섯 개가 틀렸다 -> 틀린 예측 5건 로그아웃이 정리하지 않는다 -> 로그아웃 미정리 볼륨이 없으면 여기까지다 -> 볼륨 없음 Three node labels were sentences too and became names: 세션 스냅샷, 예측 선기록, 대조군 확보. What stays is what the rules protect — identifiers, commands and measured values: PRIMARY KEY (client_registration_id, principal_name), ValidationFailedException: 1 changesets check sum, nginx -t && nginx -s reload, SET LOCAL synchronous_commit TO OFF. Those are names of things, not prose about them. 294 canvas strings across 28 diagrams, none matching a sentence ending, average 11 characters. All 28 still lint clean and re-rendered. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
11 lines
323 B
Plaintext
11 lines
323 B
Plaintext
%% 대조군 없이는 귀속할 수 없다
|
|
%% question: 관측된 이상을 무엇의 탓으로 돌릴 수 있는가
|
|
flowchart TB
|
|
n0["주입 전 대조군"]
|
|
n1["주입 중 관측"]
|
|
n2["귀속"]
|
|
n3["오보"]
|
|
n0 -->|"비교 기준"| n1
|
|
n1 -->|"대조군 있음"| n2
|
|
n1 -->|"대조군 없음"| n3
|