DongHyeonkaandClaude Opus 5
b2963105a8
The keycloak project ended with four open questions that design could not
settle. A two-VM lab was built to answer them by measurement, and this is
that material: 26 experiments, 125 raw command outputs, 22 browser captures.
Follows the import procedure in README.md.
source/ the originating repository verbatim — 78 documents, 28 SVGs,
8 manifests, plus .source-revision recording the commit
final/ the SSOT
document.md 729 lines written from the 29 experiment documents, not
concatenated: what was predicted, what was measured, and
where the measurement itself was wrong
evidence/raw 125 outputs, flattened to <experiment>__<file> because
the originals collided (01-baseline.txt appeared three
times) and the audit only globs the top level
evidence/meta one per raw file; command and exitCode are null and the
README says why rather than inventing them
evidence/browser 22 captures
assets/ three diagrams through techviz
.techviz/ their VizSpecs
A separate project rather than an addition to keycloak: the B-layer answers
that project's four questions, but the A, C and D layers are about cluster
failure, SSO and operations, and one document.md should hold one subject.
The four question records there can point here through 관계.
Recorded rather than papered over: only three of the 28 diagrams were
remade. The repository forbids hand-drawn SVG and forbids titles inside the
canvas; all 28 originals carry both, so converting them is redrawing, not
reformatting. They stay in source/ and the gap is written into the document.
verify-pipeline.py passes. audit-records.py reports no issues.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
12 lines
361 B
Plaintext
12 lines
361 B
Plaintext
%% 세션 공유가 실제로 지나는 경로
|
|
%% question: 두 Keycloak 노드가 같은 세션을 아는 것은 무엇 때문인가
|
|
flowchart LR
|
|
n0["keycloak-0"]
|
|
n1[("PostgreSQL")]
|
|
n2["keycloak-1"]
|
|
n3[("JGROUPS_PING")]
|
|
n0 -->|"세션 INSERT"| n1
|
|
n2 -->|"세션 SELECT"| n1
|
|
n0 -->|"멤버 등록"| n3
|
|
n2 -->|"멤버 등록"| n3
|