Files
document-haness/docs/clean-architecture-backend-template/final/evidence/raw/analysis-finding-a18-f002.txt
T
DongHyeonkaandClaude Opus 5 b2963105a8 docs(keycloak-session-store): import the session-storage lab as a new project
The keycloak project ended with four open questions that design could not
settle. A two-VM lab was built to answer them by measurement, and this is
that material: 26 experiments, 125 raw command outputs, 22 browser captures.

Follows the import procedure in README.md.

  source/     the originating repository verbatim — 78 documents, 28 SVGs,
              8 manifests, plus .source-revision recording the commit
  final/      the SSOT
    document.md   729 lines written from the 29 experiment documents, not
                  concatenated: what was predicted, what was measured, and
                  where the measurement itself was wrong
    evidence/raw    125 outputs, flattened to <experiment>__<file> because
                    the originals collided (01-baseline.txt appeared three
                    times) and the audit only globs the top level
    evidence/meta   one per raw file; command and exitCode are null and the
                    README says why rather than inventing them
    evidence/browser  22 captures
    assets/       three diagrams through techviz
    .techviz/     their VizSpecs

A separate project rather than an addition to keycloak: the B-layer answers
that project's four questions, but the A, C and D layers are about cluster
failure, SSO and operations, and one document.md should hold one subject.
The four question records there can point here through 관계.

Recorded rather than papered over: only three of the 28 diagrams were
remade. The repository forbids hand-drawn SVG and forbids titles inside the
canvas; all 28 originals carry both, so converting them is redrawing, not
reformatting. They stay in source/ and the gap is written into the document.

verify-pipeline.py passes. audit-records.py reports no issues.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-04 22:51:59 +09:00

16 lines
571 B
Plaintext

### 26.1 P3 — 실패는 환경 원인이며, 그 테스트의 도구 가드가 불완전하다
```
org.opentest4j.AssertionFailedError: [verify-compose-profile-contracts.sh said:
jq is required
]
expected: 0 but was: 78
at ComposeMergeCharacterizationTest.everyLaneMatchesItsContract(ComposeMergeCharacterizationTest.java:62)
$ which jq -> NO_JQ
```
**저장소 결함이 아니다.** 분석 컨테이너에 `jq`가 없고, 위임된 스크립트가 그것을 요구하며 exit 78로 정직하게 실패한다.
기록하는 것은 가드의 비대칭이다: