docs: C-2 — nothing propagates because nobody implemented the receiving end
Neither client had a backchannel logout URL and the BFF has no oidcLogout configuration, so the three candidate paths all answer 302, which is the authentication redirect rather than a handler. Setting the URL on the identity provider alone changed nothing: with a live session, logging the user out emptied the Keycloak side and left the Redis session untouched. Reachability is not the blocker here, since a Keycloak pod fetches the app's public URL with a 200, but that is a property of this tailnet split-DNS lab and is the assumption most likely to fail in production, where it fails silently. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
co-authored by
Claude Opus 5
parent
e856e7af4d
commit
6c310c93b7
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
|
||||
=== 현재 클라이언트의 백채널 로그아웃 설정 ===
|
||||
--- bff-confidential ---
|
||||
"frontchannelLogout" : false,
|
||||
--- oauth2-proxy ---
|
||||
"frontchannelLogout" : false,
|
||||
|
||||
=== BFF 가 백채널 로그아웃 엔드포인트를 갖고 있는가 ===
|
||||
|
||||
=== 실제로 그 경로가 있는가 ===
|
||||
/logout/connect/back-channel/keycloak HTTP 302
|
||||
/backchannel-logout HTTP 302
|
||||
/oauth2/sign_out HTTP 302
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user