docs: correct the places where documents contradicted their own evidence

An independent audit found ten documents printing values their evidence files do not contain. C-1 printed a session count of 0 where the evidence says 4, C-2 printed a success readback for a command that exited 1, and A-1 credited the conntrack flush with a split that the timestamps attribute to a pod restart four seconds earlier.

Also measured wal_writer_delay, which A-3 had asserted as matching without ever querying it, relabelled the A-6 control that moved 41 percent, noted A-8's nine-sample resolution, corrected D-1's RTO to the 41 seconds its own timeline shows, and added a correction banner to D-2. Every experiment document now links its evidence files with their real collection times, and the duplicate screenshots are documented as duplicates.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

docs/experiment-b5-redis-loss-persistence.md

@@ -223,6 +223,21 @@ appendfsync everysec      ← 기본값
 
 ---
 
+---
+
+## 증거 파일
+
+**증거 수집 시각: 2026-09-04 14:24 – 14:28 KST** (파일 mtime 기준. 문서 상단의 시각 표기는 작성 시점이라 다를 수 있다.)
+
+| 파일 | 종류 |
+|---|---|
+| [`01-baseline.txt`](evidence/b5-redis-loss/01-baseline.txt) | 터미널 원문 |
+| [`02-redis-down.txt`](evidence/b5-redis-loss/02-redis-down.txt) | 터미널 원문 |
+| [`03-health-groups.txt`](evidence/b5-redis-loss/03-health-groups.txt) | 터미널 원문 |
+| [`04-persistence.txt`](evidence/b5-redis-loss/04-persistence.txt) | 터미널 원문 |
+
+파일별 상세는 [`evidence/b5-redis-loss/README.md`](evidence/b5-redis-loss/README.md).
+
 ## 5. 재현 절차 (명령어)
 
 ```bash