An independent audit found ten documents printing values their evidence files do not contain. C-1 printed a session count of 0 where the evidence says 4, C-2 printed a success readback for a command that exited 1, and A-1 credited the conntrack flush with a split that the timestamps attribute to a pod restart four seconds earlier.
Also measured wal_writer_delay, which A-3 had asserted as matching without ever querying it, relabelled the A-6 control that moved 41 percent, noted A-8's nine-sample resolution, corrected D-1's RTO to the 41 seconds its own timeline shows, and added a correction banner to D-2. Every experiment document now links its evidence files with their real collection times, and the duplicate screenshots are documented as duplicates.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Three injections failed first: kube-router keeps reinserting its chain above a hand-placed FORWARD rule, the JGroups connection direction had reversed since A-1, and only the raw table runs ahead of conntrack. Each failure looked like nothing happening.
Blocking one direction never partitioned the cluster because JGroups reconnected the other way before failure detection fired. Blocking both produced a real split brain with two coordinators in JGROUPS_PING, yet only the non-coordinator node reported DOWN, so the Service kept an endpoint and the front door stayed at 200. That answers the question A-1 left open.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
