Written by subagents running under the writing-practitioner-guides skill,
one guide per experiment, 22,566 lines. Each walks a reader from baseline
capture through injection, injection verification, observation and recovery.
Section 3 carries the weight in most of them. Injection failed silently nine
times in this lab, and a failed injection looks exactly like no effect — so
the guides verify the target is actually in the intended state before
reading any result. A-4 makes virsh list the only proof because the node
reads Ready for 40 seconds after the machine is off; A-5 makes the packet
counter the sole go/no-go because a rule on the wrong node produces an empty
result that reads like a finding; A-6 quotes the run where 적용완료 was
printed between four Cannot find device "eth0" lines.
The traps the guides are built around are ones that invert a conclusion
rather than merely annoy:
A-0 emptying the session table without a restart leaves cache entries
that get counted as replication arriving
A-2 dropping -o /dev/null fuses body and status into one string
A-3 presence of "ready to accept connections" instead of its timestamp
B-2 row count alone reads an UPDATE as nothing having happened
B-4 tr ',' '\n' splits ["admin","editor"] so only admin is seen
B-7 no login screen means the cookie died and SSO re-authenticated
C-1 counting sessions without joining realm counts your own kcadm one
D-1 kubectl exec without -i restores nothing and still exits 0
D-4a "ran with error output" is what success looks like
Every quoted block is copied from docs/evidence/ and marked 실측; reshaped
commands are marked 미검증 rather than passed off as measured. Where a source
document carries a ★ correction the guides follow the corrected claim — A-7's
REVOKED_TOKEN hypothesis, C-1's session count, B-2's schema attribution.
Two hazards are stated rather than smoothed over: B-6 deletes a key that
cannot be recreated, and D-1/D-4 need host sudo, which asks for a password,
so those steps say a person must type them.
Audit over all 26: 672 interpretation pairs, 486 evidence citations, 117
undo sections, and zero occurrences of the patterns the skill forbids —
no python data processing, no deprecated kubectl get endpoints, no
placeholders, no bare kcadm.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The guides were written before the skill existed and a scored audit found
three gaps. Fixed by a subagent running under the skill, with measured
values, versions, IPs and quoted output declared off limits.
The big one: every step showed a command and its output, and almost none
said which line to look at or what it meant. 64 interpretation pairs added
across the seven files, weighted where the reading is hardest — 20 in the
Keycloak stage, where a Secret existing and a pod having received it are
different facts.
Only the extracting form of curl appeared. Where the reader meets a response
for the first time the guides now open with curl -I or curl -v and name the
lines worth reading; -w '%{http_code}' survives only where the code is a
value being compared — two upstream nodes against each other, or the 900-run
control loop.
Listing Secret keys went from a three-stage pipe to kubectl describe secret,
which prints the key names and their byte counts in one native command
without exposing a value.
And a tool assumption: jq and yamllint are installed on neither the lab host
nor the guests. The guides now say so where JSON is read by eye, rather than
sending the reader to install something mid-diagnosis. cloud-init schema is
on the guests and is now the guest-side check.
Also removes a stray Playwright screenshot committed at the repository root
in 919547a; the evidence copy under docs/evidence/b7a-orphan-session/ is the
one the document references.
Four things the audit left standing are recorded in the agent's report rather
than papered over — notably that 04's reload measurements are stated without
a reproduction procedure, and that 05 and 06 reference each other as
prerequisites.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The experiment documents record what was found. These record what to type to
reproduce it, in folders per stage.
Two kinds of command are kept apart. 하기/확인 is what somebody actually types
at a terminal — short, one at a time. 근거를 재려면 is the long measuring form
this lab used to put evidence in a document, marked as not needed day to day.
The same split applies to curl: -I to look once, -w '%{http_code}' only when
comparing across repetitions.
No placeholders. Where a value is needed the command that produces it is
given, and secrets are checked by length rather than printed:
TOKEN=$(ssh kc-lab-1 'sudo cat /var/lib/rancher/k3s/server/node-token')
echo "${#TOKEN} 자"
Stage 05 verifies resources in layers, because a Secret existing and a pod
having received it are different facts: keys, then length, then the value
inside the container, then which env var came from which Secret. Same for
workloads — Deployment to ReplicaSet to Pod, with the seven ReplicaSets this
cluster actually carries as the worked example.
Two commands were wrong and re-running them caught it. kubectl get endpoints
prints a deprecation warning on v1.33+, so the guide uses describe svc and
EndpointSlice. And the Keycloak image has no curl, so reading metrics from
inside the container fails with exit 127 — the guide asks Prometheus instead,
or runs a throwaway curl pod.
Read-only checks were executed against the running lab and their output is
quoted verbatim. Creating commands could not be re-run without destroying the
lab, so they are the ones used at build time; the README says which is which.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
DongHyeonka