The forward upgrade to 26.7.3 was zero downtime across 87 samples, and since databasechangelog stayed at 210 the rollback to 26.7.0 also succeeded, which narrows D-2's conclusion: rolling back fails when the schema moved, not because of the version number. The row count is the check.
Role changes never reach the upstream through request repetition; the session is a snapshot taken at login and only a new session picks up the new claim. Auditing the docs also surfaced that Prometheus scrapes only keycloak, kubelet, node-exporter and itself, so the B-layer experiments have no metrics to screenshot rather than missing screenshots.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
One user session carries a client session per application, so visiting the second app skips the login screen. Deleting the identity provider session leaves both application sessions untouched and both apps keep serving, because the identity provider, the application session and the access token each have their own lifetime.
That inverts the B-2 finding: there the app session was cleared and the surviving SSO session let the user straight back in. Either way, clearing one side leaves the other. It also means an identity provider outage is a single point of failure for logging in, not for already-authenticated users, and the failure arrives late and all at once.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
