chore: sync the frontend template from 4dc033c to 8157ad4

The product was materialized from the template at `4dc033c` and has stayed
on it through 43 template commits, so it was missing all three rounds of
adapter remediation — including files it never had, such as the shared
`abortable-operation` primitive and the `exact-snapshot` decoder that
later fixes are written against. Taking only the newest round was not
possible for that reason: the delta is coherent only as a whole.

The product had not touched `src/adapters` at all since materialization,
so the 140-file delta applied with a three-way merge and no conflicts.
`package.json` was the single overlap and merged cleanly: the product owns
`name`, the template contributed `check:adapter-inventory`,
`check:remediation-ledger` and the image-resolve-signal type fixture.
All 24 product-owned files — README, index.html, CI workflow, i18n
catalog, home page, generated schemas, evidence scripts, component and
visual snapshots — are byte-identical to `main`.

`template.lock.json` now pins the synced revision and tree.

Verified in this repository, not inherited from the template: six type
projects, lint, nine gates (adapter inventory, remediation ledger,
registries, diagnostics, realtime boundaries, architecture, browser
file/storage boundaries, optional recipes, documentation), the production
build, and 2,054 of 2,073 tests. The 19 failures are all in
`tests/unit/ci-artifact-contract.test.ts` and are the same pre-existing
sandbox RLIMIT, EMFILE, umask and `/tmp` permission behaviour the template
records; four suites that failed once under parallel load pass in
isolation.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
DongHyeonka
2026-08-15 12:04:58 +09:00
co-authored by Claude Opus 5
parent 002ba3624e
commit 4bff9ca151
142 changed files with 23010 additions and 1544 deletions
+214 -5
View File
@@ -203,6 +203,7 @@ describe("production image CDN runtime", () => {
const resolved = await runtime.presentation.resolve({
asset: accepted.value,
preset,
signal: new AbortController().signal,
});
expect(resolved.ok).toBe(true);
if (!resolved.ok) return;
@@ -317,10 +318,11 @@ describe("production image CDN runtime", () => {
runtime.presentation.resolve({
asset: accepted.value,
preset,
signal: new AbortController().signal,
width: 9_999,
query: "format=svg",
src: "data:text/html,active",
} as Parameters<typeof runtime.presentation.resolve>[0]),
} as unknown as Parameters<typeof runtime.presentation.resolve>[0]),
).resolves.toMatchObject({
ok: false,
error: { code: "INVALID_INPUT" },
@@ -332,6 +334,7 @@ describe("production image CDN runtime", () => {
"card-landscape",
"render-public-product-image",
),
signal: new AbortController().signal,
}),
).resolves.toMatchObject({
ok: false,
@@ -341,6 +344,7 @@ describe("production image CDN runtime", () => {
runtime.presentation.resolve({
asset: {} as typeof accepted.value,
preset,
signal: new AbortController().signal,
}),
).resolves.toMatchObject({
ok: false,
@@ -385,6 +389,7 @@ describe("production image CDN runtime", () => {
const resolved = await runtime.presentation.resolve({
asset: accepted.value,
preset: presetReference,
signal: new AbortController().signal,
});
expect(resolved.ok).toBe(true);
if (!resolved.ok) return;
@@ -782,6 +787,7 @@ describe("production image CDN runtime", () => {
runtime.presentation.resolve({
asset: accepted.value,
preset,
signal: new AbortController().signal,
}),
).resolves.toMatchObject({
ok: false,
@@ -840,6 +846,7 @@ describe("production image CDN runtime", () => {
runtime.presentation.resolve({
asset: accepted.value,
preset: lazy,
signal: new AbortController().signal,
}),
).resolves.toMatchObject({
ok: false,
@@ -999,7 +1006,13 @@ describe("production image CDN runtime", () => {
expect(abortDeadline.clearTimeout).toHaveBeenCalledOnce();
});
it("bounds concurrent capability verification and releases the slot after abort", async () => {
/**
* TR-RR-07. The concurrency cap exists to bound *physical* verification work.
* Releasing the slot when the wrapper's abort resolved let an abandoned
* verifier keep running while a new one was admitted, so repeated aborts
* produced more concurrent work than the configured cap allows.
*/
it("holds the verification slot until the raw verifier settles", async () => {
const preset = imageCdnPresetReference(
"verification-concurrency",
"bound-image-verification-concurrency",
@@ -1011,10 +1024,13 @@ describe("production image CDN runtime", () => {
},
});
let verificationAttempt = 0;
let releaseFirst: ((value: boolean) => void) | undefined;
const verify = vi.fn(() => {
verificationAttempt += 1;
return verificationAttempt === 1
? new Promise<boolean>(() => undefined)
? new Promise<boolean>((resolve) => {
releaseFirst = resolve;
})
: Promise.resolve(true);
});
const runtime = createImageCdnRuntime({
@@ -1047,9 +1063,24 @@ describe("production image CDN runtime", () => {
ok: false,
error: { code: "ABORTED" },
});
// The caller's wait ended, but the raw verifier has not. Admitting a second
// one here would put two physical verifications under a cap of one.
await expect(
runtime.assets.acceptBackendIssued(issued),
).resolves.toMatchObject({ ok: true });
).resolves.toMatchObject({
ok: false,
error: { code: "LIMIT_EXCEEDED" },
});
expect(verify).toHaveBeenCalledOnce();
// Once the raw verifier settles the slot is free again.
releaseFirst?.(true);
await vi.waitFor(async () => {
await expect(
runtime.assets.acceptBackendIssued(issued),
).resolves.toMatchObject({ ok: true });
});
expect(verify).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2);
});
@@ -1110,6 +1141,7 @@ describe("production image CDN runtime", () => {
runtime.presentation.resolve({
asset: accepted.value,
preset,
signal: new AbortController().signal,
}),
).resolves.toMatchObject({ ok: true });
const acceptedPrivate =
@@ -1125,6 +1157,7 @@ describe("production image CDN runtime", () => {
runtime.presentation.resolve({
asset: accepted.value,
preset,
signal: new AbortController().signal,
}),
).resolves.toMatchObject({
ok: false,
@@ -1479,6 +1512,10 @@ describe("browser image probe", () => {
close: vi.fn(),
}));
for (const cacheControl of [
// BT-IMG-02. Unmatched quotes must not be unwrapped into a bare number.
'public, max-age="31536000, immutable',
'public, max-age=31536000", immutable',
'public, max-age="31536000\\", immutable',
"public, public, max-age=31536000, immutable",
"public, max-age=31536000, s-maxage=60, immutable",
"public, max-age=31536000, immutable, must-revalidate",
@@ -1645,7 +1682,9 @@ describe("browser image probe", () => {
responseAt(imageUrl, png, {
status: 200,
headers: {
"cache-control": "private, no-store",
// TR-RR-09. A private response carries `no-store` and nothing else
// that describes cacheability.
"cache-control": "no-store",
"content-type": "image/png",
},
}),
@@ -1735,6 +1774,67 @@ describe("browser image probe", () => {
});
});
/**
* TR-RR-09. The recorded BT-IMG-02 contract for a private response is a
* fail-closed matrix. Accepting `no-store` next to a directive that describes
* cacheability lets a self-contradictory policy read as acceptable.
*/
it("applies the full private Cache-Control matrix", async () => {
const png = pngBytes(640, 360);
const probeWith = async (cacheControl: string) => {
const probe = createBrowserImageProbe({
fetcher: (async () =>
responseAt(imageUrl, png, {
status: 200,
headers: {
"cache-control": cacheControl,
"content-type": "image/png",
},
})) as typeof fetch,
createBitmap: async () => ({
width: 640,
height: 360,
close: vi.fn(),
}),
});
return await probe.probe(
request({
delivery: "PRIVATE_SIGNED",
minimumPublicMaxAgeSeconds: 0,
}),
);
};
// Only `no-store`, plus a syntactically valid unknown extension.
expect(await probeWith("no-store")).toMatchObject({ ok: true });
expect(await probeWith('no-store, x-vendor="a,b"')).toMatchObject({
ok: true,
});
for (const companion of [
"public",
"private",
"immutable",
"max-age=60",
"s-maxage=60",
"no-cache",
"must-revalidate",
"proxy-revalidate",
]) {
expect(await probeWith(`no-store, ${companion}`)).toMatchObject({
ok: false,
error: { code: "POLICY_REJECTED" },
});
}
for (const withoutNoStore of ["private", "no-cache", "max-age=0"]) {
expect(await probeWith(withoutNoStore)).toMatchObject({
ok: false,
error: { code: "POLICY_REJECTED" },
});
}
});
it("times out a stalled body, aborts the composed signal and cancels its reader", async () => {
const manual = manualImageProbeScheduler();
const cancel = vi.fn(async () => undefined);
@@ -1836,6 +1936,115 @@ describe("browser image probe", () => {
expect(close).toHaveBeenCalledOnce();
});
});
/**
* X-AUDIT-02. `probe()` promises a `BrowserDataResult`. A scheduler that
* cannot install the probe deadline must close the probe inside that contract
* rather than rejecting it, and must not leave the caller's listener behind.
*/
describe("scheduler boundary", () => {
const trackedSignal = () => {
const controller = new AbortController();
const added: string[] = [];
const removed: string[] = [];
const add = controller.signal.addEventListener.bind(controller.signal);
const remove = controller.signal.removeEventListener.bind(
controller.signal,
);
Object.defineProperty(controller.signal, "addEventListener", {
configurable: true,
value: (type: string, ...rest: readonly unknown[]) => {
added.push(type);
return (add as (...args: readonly unknown[]) => unknown)(
type,
...rest,
);
},
});
Object.defineProperty(controller.signal, "removeEventListener", {
configurable: true,
value: (type: string, ...rest: readonly unknown[]) => {
removed.push(type);
return (remove as (...args: readonly unknown[]) => unknown)(
type,
...rest,
);
},
});
return { controller, added, removed };
};
it("closes the probe when the scheduler cannot install the deadline", async () => {
const fetcher = vi.fn(async () => new Response(null, { status: 200 }));
const { controller, added, removed } = trackedSignal();
const probe = createBrowserImageProbe({
fetcher: fetcher as unknown as typeof fetch,
createBitmap: vi.fn(),
timeoutMs: 1_000,
scheduler: {
setTimeout: () => {
throw new TypeError("image scheduler install exploded");
},
clearTimeout: vi.fn(),
},
});
await expect(
probe.probe({ ...request(), signal: controller.signal }),
).resolves.toMatchObject({
ok: false,
error: { code: "UNAVAILABLE", retryable: true, recovery: "RETRY" },
});
expect(fetcher).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(added.filter((type) => type === "abort")).toHaveLength(1);
expect(removed.filter((type) => type === "abort")).toHaveLength(1);
});
it("starts no timer and no fetch for an already aborted caller", async () => {
const fetcher = vi.fn(async () => new Response(null, { status: 200 }));
const setTimeout_ = vi.fn(() => 1);
const controller = new AbortController();
controller.abort();
const probe = createBrowserImageProbe({
fetcher: fetcher as unknown as typeof fetch,
createBitmap: vi.fn(),
timeoutMs: 1_000,
scheduler: { setTimeout: setTimeout_, clearTimeout: vi.fn() },
});
await expect(
probe.probe({ ...request(), signal: controller.signal }),
).resolves.toMatchObject({ ok: false, error: { code: "ABORTED" } });
expect(fetcher).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(setTimeout_).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("keeps the classified outcome when clearing the deadline throws", async () => {
const png = pngBytes(640, 360);
const probe = createBrowserImageProbe({
fetcher: (async () =>
responseAt(imageUrl, png, {
status: 200,
headers: publicImageHeaders("image/png", png.byteLength),
})) as typeof fetch,
createBitmap: vi.fn(async () => ({
width: 640,
height: 360,
close: vi.fn(),
})),
timeoutMs: 1_000,
scheduler: {
setTimeout: (callback: () => void, milliseconds: number) =>
setTimeout(callback, milliseconds),
clearTimeout: () => {
throw new TypeError("image scheduler clear exploded");
},
},
});
await expect(probe.probe(request())).resolves.toMatchObject({ ok: true });
});
});
});
describe("P-256 image capability verifier", () => {