chore: sync the frontend template from 4dc033c to 8157ad4

The product was materialized from the template at `4dc033c` and has stayed
on it through 43 template commits, so it was missing all three rounds of
adapter remediation — including files it never had, such as the shared
`abortable-operation` primitive and the `exact-snapshot` decoder that
later fixes are written against. Taking only the newest round was not
possible for that reason: the delta is coherent only as a whole.

The product had not touched `src/adapters` at all since materialization,
so the 140-file delta applied with a three-way merge and no conflicts.
`package.json` was the single overlap and merged cleanly: the product owns
`name`, the template contributed `check:adapter-inventory`,
`check:remediation-ledger` and the image-resolve-signal type fixture.
All 24 product-owned files — README, index.html, CI workflow, i18n
catalog, home page, generated schemas, evidence scripts, component and
visual snapshots — are byte-identical to `main`.

`template.lock.json` now pins the synced revision and tree.

Verified in this repository, not inherited from the template: six type
projects, lint, nine gates (adapter inventory, remediation ledger,
registries, diagnostics, realtime boundaries, architecture, browser
file/storage boundaries, optional recipes, documentation), the production
build, and 2,054 of 2,073 tests. The 19 failures are all in
`tests/unit/ci-artifact-contract.test.ts` and are the same pre-existing
sandbox RLIMIT, EMFILE, umask and `/tmp` permission behaviour the template
records; four suites that failed once under parallel load pass in
isolation.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
DongHyeonka
2026-08-15 12:04:58 +09:00
co-authored by Claude Opus 5
parent 002ba3624e
commit 4bff9ca151
142 changed files with 23010 additions and 1544 deletions
+31
View File
@@ -42,6 +42,37 @@ function manualScheduler() {
}
describe("Web Push durable control fence", () => {
it.each([0, 2, 3, 9_999])(
"rejects a CAS receipt that is not the exact next revision (%i)",
async (revision) => {
// WP-01. Only the exact next revision is evidence that this command
// actually wrote the control it claims to have written.
const dependencies = createFakePushControlStoreDependencies();
const repository = dependencies.repository;
const compareAndSwap = repository.compareAndSwap.bind(repository);
repository.compareAndSwap = async (input) => {
const written = await compareAndSwap(input);
return written.ok
? {
ok: true as const,
value: { ...written.value, revision },
}
: written;
};
const store = createPushAssociationFenceStore(dependencies);
await expect(
store.prepare({
authority: firstAuthority,
updatedAt: "2026-07-28T00:00:00.000Z",
}),
).resolves.toMatchObject({
ok: false,
error: { code: "CONTROL_CORRUPT" },
});
},
);
it("CASes UNASSOCIATED to ACTIVE and prevents tombstone resurrection", async () => {
const store = createPushAssociationFenceStore(
createFakePushControlStoreDependencies(),