Merge branch 'main' into feature/techlog-ui-migration
Integrates the frontend template sync (a0fbafb → 5434760) into the TechLog UI migration. Merged in this direction so every conflict is resolved and proved in the worktree; main is only fast-forwarded afterwards and never holds a state that was not verified here. 15 conflicts. The rule throughout: keep the template's mechanism, keep the product's content, and never invent a third state neither branch would accept. The template's product manifest and its runtime feature kill switch are adopted. The route registry is deliberately not composed from contract.routes: the reference feature still declares screens this product deleted, and reducing over them would register paths with no component behind them. ROUTE_FEATURE_OWNER is narrowed to registered routes for the same reason. The first resolution did compose from contract.routes and was rejected by product-features.test.ts. Three files pinned counts and a digest describing the gate contract. Neither side's numbers describe the merged config/ci/gates.json, so they were recomputed from it rather than chosen: 27 gates, 82 commands, 94 command references, 107 evidence references, 128 artifacts, shape sha256 5063586d. README.md and docs/accessibility/manual-checklist.md now enumerate this product's 27 routes, which the template's own verify:documentation requires. product-feature-switch.test.tsx was rewritten around the invariant that still applies here — no registered route without a component — rather than deleted with the screens it used to exercise. docs/operations/template-merge-2026-08-17.md records every decision, the gate results, and the three follow-ups this merge deliberately did not decide. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -184,16 +184,18 @@ describe("CI gate contract", () => {
|
||||
const index = indexCiGateContract(contract);
|
||||
expect(contract.schemaVersion).toBe(2);
|
||||
expect(contract.gates.map(({ id }) => id)).toEqual(
|
||||
Array.from({ length: 26 }, (_, index) =>
|
||||
Array.from({ length: 27 }, (_, index) =>
|
||||
`FE-GATE-${String(index + 1).padStart(3, "0")}`,
|
||||
),
|
||||
);
|
||||
expect(contract.jobs).toHaveLength(9);
|
||||
expect(contract.commands).toHaveLength(81);
|
||||
expect(contract.gates.reduce((total, gate) => total + gate.commandIds.length, 0)).toBe(93);
|
||||
expect(contract.commands).toHaveLength(82);
|
||||
expect(contract.gates.reduce((total, gate) => total + gate.commandIds.length, 0)).toBe(94);
|
||||
expect(contract.commands.filter(({ expect }) => expect === "fail")).toHaveLength(23);
|
||||
expect(contract.gates.reduce((total, gate) => total + gate.evidenceArtifactIds.length, 0)).toBe(106);
|
||||
expect(contract.artifacts).toHaveLength(126);
|
||||
// Template merge. Recounted from the merged config/ci/gates.json rather
|
||||
// than taking either side's number.
|
||||
expect(contract.gates.reduce((total, gate) => total + gate.evidenceArtifactIds.length, 0)).toBe(107);
|
||||
expect(contract.artifacts).toHaveLength(128);
|
||||
expect(contract.stages).toHaveLength(5);
|
||||
expect(contract.retention.classes).toHaveLength(5);
|
||||
expect(index.gates.get("FE-GATE-015")?.commandIds).toHaveLength(2);
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user