편집 폼이 릴리즈 목록 아래에 열렸다. 릴리즈가 열 개 스무 개로 늘면 편집하려고 목록
전체를 지나 내려가야 하고, 저장 버튼은 그보다 더 아래에 있다. 목록이 길어질수록 편집이
멀어지는 구조다.
`/studio/releases/:id` 를 연다 — 문서와 프로젝트가 각자 편집 주소를 갖는 것과 같은
이유다. 목록의 "편집" 은 토글이 아니라 링크가 되고, 새 릴리즈를 만들면 곧바로 그 화면으로
간다(만들자마자 편집할 것이 분명하다).
라우트가 하나 늘어 CI 게이트가 함께 움직였다 — 아티팩트 기준선 133→134, 증거 개수
112→113, 게이트 형태 다이제스트 재계산(f9e7e521… 을 이전 gates.json 에서 먼저 재현해
계산 방법을 확인했다), 서빙 패턴 하나 추가.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01XEHXspz4rv5pB5wiiSsVDu
홈의 집중 카드가 제목만 보여 주고 "현재 목표"·"다음 작업" 칸이 비어 있었다.
프로젝트 페이지의 "활동" 도 늘 비어 있었다.
프로젝트를 만들 수는 있었지만 고칠 화면이 없었다. 그래서 이름과 slug 말고는 아무
값도 가질 수 없었고, 그 값을 읽는 공개 화면들은 빈칸을 그렸다 — 백엔드의
`updateProject` 는 처음부터 구현돼 있었고 채울 화면만 없었다.
`/studio/projects/:id` 를 연다. 프로젝트 필드 전부와 활동 목록을 한 화면에 둔다 —
프로젝트 밖의 활동은 존재하지 않고, 무엇이 공개 타임라인에 실리는지를 프로젝트 필드와
같은 자리에서 보는 편이 낫다.
이미 공개된 프로젝트는 저장한 뒤 투영도 함께 갱신한다. 투영은 게시할 때 세워지므로,
저장만 하면 공개 화면에는 예전 값이 남는다.
단계와 활동 유형의 선택지는 DB CHECK 제약과 같은 목록이다. 화면이 더 많은 값을
보여 주면 저장이 제약에서 터지고, 작성자는 왜 안 되는지 알 수 없다.
라우트가 하나 늘어 CI 게이트가 함께 움직였다 — FE-GATE-009 는 설치된 라우트마다 수동
접근성 증거를 하나씩 요구하고 그 집합이 정확히 일치하지 않으면 거절한다. 아티팩트
기준선 132→133, 증거 개수 111→112, 게이트 형태 다이제스트 재계산(이전 상수 187dbd96…
을 이전 gates.json 에서 먼저 재현해 계산 방법을 확인했다), 서빙 패턴 하나 추가.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01XEHXspz4rv5pB5wiiSsVDu
The public site shipped a Releases page and a footer link to a release, and
neither could ever have content: the read path existed, the write path did not.
This adds the seven release operations to the contract contribution and the
gateway, and a Studio screen that can actually write one.
The editor is six markdown fields rather than one, because that is what the
contract models and what a release note is — why, what, what a reader notices,
what it leaves in the code, how it was verified, what is still open. Publishing
is separate from saving: a draft saves in any state, but the public query keys
on PUBLISHED alone, so publish is where completeness is demanded.
No new CSS. The screen reuses the document editor's field classes and the
working-copy list's row classes, so it inherits Studio's spacing and type
instead of introducing a second look.
The footer previously linked `/releases/0.1.0` — a version that did not exist,
so the link 404'd, and one that would have gone stale at 0.2.0 anyway. It now
points at the changelog index, which is the only place that knows what the
latest release is and which reads correctly when there are none.
Route inventory, navigation order, message catalog, manual accessibility
evidence, artifact baseline, and the pinned gate-shape digest all move with the
new route. The digest was recomputed by first reproducing the previous constant
from the previous gates.json, so the computation is known to be the one it was
pinned under.
Publishing needs a topic and nothing could create one. The backend now owns
that surface; this is its consumer — the management contract vendored, a
gateway over its nine operations, and one Studio screen that lists, creates,
and deletes topics and projects.
The screen adds no CSS. It reuses the classes the working-copy list already
uses, so it inherits Studio's spacing, type, and colour rather than growing a
second visual vocabulary beside them. Scope stops at list/create/delete:
renaming, phase changes, and visibility are implemented in the backend and
declared in the contract, but their screens are a separate design.
Two real defects surfaced while making the public port async, and both would
have shipped:
The search page and the header search dialog shared a query key. With an empty
query, `["tech-log","search",""]` was identical for both, so react-query
handed one surface the other's cache — different shapes — and the page died
reading a field that was not there. Keys now name the surface.
The explore filter's selects are uncontrolled and read `defaultValue`, which
React applies once. Their options arrive later now, so the first render had
nothing to match and the value stayed empty: a topic in the URL no longer
showed as selected. The form key includes whether the catalog has arrived, so
it remounts with the options present. Controlled inputs would be the other
answer, but this form submits to build a URL — the URL owns the value.
The route brought its own bookkeeping: a build chunk, a manual accessibility
evidence file, and the CI artifact baseline that counts them. The gate pins a
digest of its own shape precisely so a new route cannot slip in without that
count being reviewed.
Test harnesses that render public screens now assemble the query providers and
await the settled paint, because the screens they render became async.
Nothing in the gate set read `public/*.json`. Every static gate passed and the
whole suite passed while `pnpm dev` rendered the boot-error screen instead of
the app, which is the only reason the drift survived two contract changes.
`check:dev-release-manifest` compares the fixture's `setAlgorithm`, `setDigest`
and package set against what `generate-contract-set.ts` composes, and is
registered on FE-GATE-010 next to `check-tech-log-contract` so CI executes it.
Unlike the refresh wired into contract generation, this observes the composed
set directly, so it also catches a contribution added to or removed from
`installed-contract-contributions.ts`.
`CANONICAL_GATE_SHAPE_SHA256` recomputed by hand, as always: the committed
constant 98d19911... was first reproduced from the committed `gates.json` with
an independent transcription of `canonicalGateShapeSha256`, and only then was
b4096244... hashed from the new one. Command counts move 84/96 -> 85/97;
artifacts stay at 130 because the gate publishes no evidence file, matching
`check-tech-log-contract`.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The TechLog suite already ran in CI, but only inside `test:coverage`'s combined
`vitest run tests/runtime-schema tests/unit … tests/features/tech-log`
invocation on FE-GATE-005. A TechLog regression therefore surfaced as a
coverage-gate failure, and the only junit that carried it was coverage.xml,
which reports every other suite at the same time.
`test-tech-log` now sits on FE-GATE-007 beside `test-reference-feature`, the
sibling it mirrors — both drive a suite under `tests/features/` — and declares
`artifacts/tests/tech-log.xml`, which `test:tech-log` already wrote, as its own
command-generated junit evidence. The gate log now names
`$ corepack pnpm test:tech-log` as its own step and the failure lands on the
suite that produced it.
Adding a command and an artifact moves the exact-count authority to 84
definitions / 96 references / 130 artifacts (109 evidence references), and
changes the canonical gate shape digest because FE-GATE-007's commandIds and
evidenceArtifactIds are part of it. There is no tooling to regenerate that
digest, so it was recomputed by hand under the standing procedure: a fresh
transcription of `canonicalGateShapeSha256` first reproduced the committed
f3cc9075… from the unedited config/ci/gates.json — proving the transcription,
not just agreeing with whatever the check compares against — and only then
hashed the edited file to 98d19911….
`corepack pnpm ci:gate -- FE-GATE-007` passes end to end; the generated
workflow bytes are unchanged, since the yml dispatches gates rather than
commands.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
`check:tech-log-contract` existed and worked but nothing ran it. No gate in
`config/ci/gates.json` referenced it and `test:all` did not chain it, so a
hand-edit of the vendored canonical yaml or of `generated.ts` passed every
gate the repository actually executes -- the exact regression the digest pin
exists to prevent.
FE-GATE-010 (architecture/contract governance) now owns the command, beside
`check-registries` and `check-ci`, and `test:all` runs it in front of
`test:tech-log`. The canonical authority baseline moves to 83 command
definitions / 95 references and the gate-shape SHA-256 is recomputed with
`canonicalGateShapeSha256`; the recomputation was first verified by
reproducing the previous constant from the previous gates.json.
`tests/features/tech-log/contract-generation.test.ts` now fails if either
wiring is removed again.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Adds TECH_LOG_STUDIO_ASSETS (/studio/assets) as a route reachable but
excluded from primary Studio navigation (navigationLabel/navigationOrder
null), plus the AssetLibrary screen that lists assets, shows usage, and
lets an operator archive or hard-delete one. canHardDelete() is a pure
gate mirroring the server's ASSET_IN_USE rule so the screen never offers
an action the server would refuse.
Adding a 28th route also required updating the route-scoped CI
accessibility-evidence gate (FE-GATE-009 in config/ci/gates.json, plus
its authority-baseline counts and shape digest in
scripts/contracts/ci-gates.ts) and the Vite route-to-chunk map that
scripts/generate-build-manifest.ts depends on, or test:unit and the
production build both fail. See task-11-report.md for the full
breakdown.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Integrates the frontend template sync (a0fbafb → 5434760) into the TechLog UI
migration. Merged in this direction so every conflict is resolved and proved in
the worktree; main is only fast-forwarded afterwards and never holds a state
that was not verified here.
15 conflicts. The rule throughout: keep the template's mechanism, keep the
product's content, and never invent a third state neither branch would accept.
The template's product manifest and its runtime feature kill switch are adopted.
The route registry is deliberately not composed from contract.routes: the
reference feature still declares screens this product deleted, and reducing over
them would register paths with no component behind them. ROUTE_FEATURE_OWNER is
narrowed to registered routes for the same reason. The first resolution did
compose from contract.routes and was rejected by product-features.test.ts.
Three files pinned counts and a digest describing the gate contract. Neither
side's numbers describe the merged config/ci/gates.json, so they were recomputed
from it rather than chosen: 27 gates, 82 commands, 94 command references, 107
evidence references, 128 artifacts, shape sha256 5063586d.
README.md and docs/accessibility/manual-checklist.md now enumerate this
product's 27 routes, which the template's own verify:documentation requires.
product-feature-switch.test.tsx was rewritten around the invariant that still
applies here — no registered route without a component — rather than deleted
with the screens it used to exercise.
docs/operations/template-merge-2026-08-17.md records every decision, the gate
results, and the three follow-ups this merge deliberately did not decide.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Carries eight template commits: the provider sandbox actually running, release
admission to a named environment, the product feature manifest with its runtime
kill switch, architecture and documentation rules that match what is enforced,
the removability fixtures, and the browser, visual and performance evidence.
Product identity is unchanged. `package.json` keeps `tech-log-frontend` and the
catalog keeps the Tech Log naming; the home page was not in the delta. The
visual baselines are this product's own — the template's were excluded from the
transplant and these were regenerated here, where the only difference is the
platform overview's new product-feature section.
What this repository gains operationally: `config/runtime/{local,development,
staging,production}.json` with `FE-GATE-027` refusing an artifact whose runtime
document does not match the environment it is being admitted to, and
`FEATURE_OVERRIDES` for taking an installed feature out of service without a
rebuild.
Verified here: eight gates green, build green, visual 5/5, and 1,858 of 1,859
tests in the suites that do not need a sandbox — the one failure passes in
isolation and is a jsdom lazy-chunk timeout under parallel load. The provider
suites cannot run on this machine at all: `kernel.apparmor_restrict_unprivileged
_userns=1` makes `bwrap --unshare-net` fail, reproducible without any code from
either repository.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
