주요 주제 — 프로젝트 화면은 처음부터 `project.topics` 를 읽고 있었는데 공개 계약에
그 자리가 없었다. `project_topic` 은 테이블도 있고 조인할 수도 있었지만 응답에 실을
곳이 없었고, 고를 화면도 없었다. 계약에 자리를 만들고, 편집 화면에 주제 선택을 붙이고,
공개 조회가 ACTIVE 인 주제만 고른 순서대로 내보내게 한다.
활동 위치 열기 — 그 링크는 활동의 관련 기록을 따라간다. 백엔드는 처음부터 그 경로를
유도하고 있었지만, 활동을 만들 때 기록을 고를 방법이 없어 모든 줄이 관련 기록 없이
저장됐다. 활동 추가 폼에 유형·일시·제목·요약·연결할 기록·노출을 모두 둔다.
Case 목차 — 오른쪽 목차가 어떤 문서에서도 나오지 않았다. Case 렌더러가 둘이었고
어느 쪽을 쓸지 `publicPath === "/cases/collection-fetch-join-pagination"` 이라는 슬러그
비교가 정했다. 설계 픽스처 문서 하나만 breadcrumb·목차가 있는 완성된 배치를 받고, 실제로
작성한 Case 는 전부 축약본으로 떨어졌다. 배치를 하나로 합치고, 목차는 본문에 제목이
있을 때만 그린다.
Studio UI — 새로 만든 화면들이 기존 디테일을 따라가지 않고 있었다. `<label htmlFor>` +
별도 컨트롤 대신 편집기가 쓰는 `<label><span>` 묶음을, 임시로 만든 폼 클래스 대신
`studio-editor-section`·`studio-field-grid` 를 쓴다. 릴리즈 목록 행에는 유형 라벨이
빠져 격자 첫 열이 비어 있었고(제목이 당겨져 다른 목록과 줄이 맞지 않았다) 버튼 둘이
묶이지 않은 채였다. 프로젝트 행에는 단계·공개 범위를 한국어로 적고 "내용 편집" 을
다음 행동으로 둔다.
로그인 화면 — "인증 연동 지점을 확인하기 위한 보호 라우트" 는 이 뼈대를 만들던 사람에게
하는 말이었다. 이 화면을 보는 사람은 글을 쓰러 온 작성자다.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01XEHXspz4rv5pB5wiiSsVDu
홈의 집중 카드가 제목만 보여 주고 "현재 목표"·"다음 작업" 칸이 비어 있었다.
프로젝트 페이지의 "활동" 도 늘 비어 있었다.
프로젝트를 만들 수는 있었지만 고칠 화면이 없었다. 그래서 이름과 slug 말고는 아무
값도 가질 수 없었고, 그 값을 읽는 공개 화면들은 빈칸을 그렸다 — 백엔드의
`updateProject` 는 처음부터 구현돼 있었고 채울 화면만 없었다.
`/studio/projects/:id` 를 연다. 프로젝트 필드 전부와 활동 목록을 한 화면에 둔다 —
프로젝트 밖의 활동은 존재하지 않고, 무엇이 공개 타임라인에 실리는지를 프로젝트 필드와
같은 자리에서 보는 편이 낫다.
이미 공개된 프로젝트는 저장한 뒤 투영도 함께 갱신한다. 투영은 게시할 때 세워지므로,
저장만 하면 공개 화면에는 예전 값이 남는다.
단계와 활동 유형의 선택지는 DB CHECK 제약과 같은 목록이다. 화면이 더 많은 값을
보여 주면 저장이 제약에서 터지고, 작성자는 왜 안 되는지 알 수 없다.
라우트가 하나 늘어 CI 게이트가 함께 움직였다 — FE-GATE-009 는 설치된 라우트마다 수동
접근성 증거를 하나씩 요구하고 그 집합이 정확히 일치하지 않으면 거절한다. 아티팩트
기준선 132→133, 증거 개수 111→112, 게이트 형태 다이제스트 재계산(이전 상수 187dbd96…
을 이전 gates.json 에서 먼저 재현해 계산 방법을 확인했다), 서빙 패턴 하나 추가.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01XEHXspz4rv5pB5wiiSsVDu
공개 화면 다섯 곳이 조용히 비어 있었다. 원인은 하나씩 달랐지만 모두 "값을 채울
방법이 없었다"는 같은 모양이었다.
홈의 "지금 집중하는 것" — `home_focus_config` 는 마이그레이션이 빈 행 하나만
넣어 두었고, 계약에 선언된 `getHomeFocus`/`updateHomeFocus` 는 구현이 없었다.
세 슬롯이 모두 비면 홈은 그 영역을 아예 그리지 않으므로, 운영에서는 한 번도
나타난 적이 없다. Studio 대시보드에 고르는 화면을 둔다.
홈의 "최근 기록" — 화면이 공개된 프로젝트를 하나씩 돌며 타임라인을 조립했다.
그래서 게시한 문서라도 그 프로젝트가 공개되어 있지 않으면 목록에서 통째로
빠졌고, 실제로 릴리스 한 줄만 남았다. 무엇이 최근인지는 공개 투영이 이미 알고
있으므로 그것을 그대로 읽는다. 프로젝트마다 요청을 보내던 N+1 도 사라진다.
프로젝트 공개 — 프로젝트는 `RecordKind` 에 없어 문서 게시 파이프라인을 타지
못하는데, 공개 화면들(프로젝트 목록·프로필의 "현재 프로젝트"·홈 focus)은 전부
`public_resource_projection` 의 PROJECT 행을 가시성 관문으로 쓴다. 그 행을
세우는 경로가 없었으므로 프로젝트는 영원히 비공개였다. 계약에 이미 있던
`publishProject`/`unpublishProject` 를 구현하고 주제·프로젝트 화면에 버튼을 둔다.
문서 사이 관계 연결 — `JdbcCatalogQueryAdapter` 의 RELATION/EVIDENCE 가
`List.of()` 스텁이라 어떤 기록도 연결 대상 목록을 채울 수 없었다. RELATION 은
작성 중에 고르는 것이므로 작업본까지 포함하고, EVIDENCE 는 읽는 사람이 따라갈
수 있어야 하므로 공개된 것만 포함한다.
본문 너비 — 문서 한 편이 세 폭으로 갈라져 있었다. 머리말 920px, 유형·프로젝트
줄은 shell 전체 1180px, 본문은 672px 를 가운데 정렬. 셋을 같은 폭·같은 왼쪽
끝에 세우고 읽는 단을 56rem 으로 넓힌다.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01XEHXspz4rv5pB5wiiSsVDu
Every failure in the management screens printed a guess. Deleting a working
copy said "it may be published, or something may reference it, or someone may
have edited it first" — three maybes, while the server had answered with
exactly one: "이 기록을 참조하는 곳이 있어 삭제할 수 없습니다". A version
conflict read as "in use" because the same sentence covered both, and an author
watching some deletions succeed and others fail had no way to tell them apart.
The gateway now carries the server's client-safe message and the screens show
it. The canned sentences remain only as a fallback for a failure that never
reached the server.
The topic status label said "사용 중" for every active topic, including one
created seconds earlier that nothing references. Next to a refusal about
records that use a topic, the two read as the same statement. It says "활성"
now, which is what the status means.
Publishing also stops demanding a finished document — the mock validator moves
with the real one, so what an author sees against fixtures matches production.
Four things an author could not do, and the check that should have caught them.
A Decision could not be deleted. Case, Reference and Question all could, so an
author who opened a decision draft had no way to close it. The contract gained
the operation and the list now offers it for every kind. Its path carries the
project because a decision belongs to one; a row with no project says so rather
than failing.
Assets could only be managed by leaving the document. The picker now deletes
one in place — the server still refuses an asset a document uses — so a
mistaken upload does not cost the author their editing session.
Zoom was decided for the author and could not be changed: only a DIAGRAM got
it, so a screenshot uploaded as an image or attachment went in with zoom off
and no way to turn it on. It now defaults on for images and the picker offers
the choice. The toggle is a picker control, not a document field, and carries
its own class — wearing the field class put it in the editor's field list.
`scripts/smoke/production-sweep.ts` walks every public and Studio screen and
the document flow, reporting console errors, failed API calls and error text.
It exists because verifying only the screen I had just changed is what let
broken screens reach production repeatedly; this runs before a deploy, not
after a report.
`resolution` leaves the input's required list, so the generated type makes it
optional. The editor already sent null for an unresolved question; nothing in
the frontend changes behaviour.
Two things an author could not control from Studio.
The profile's "주요 관심 주제" was four strings in the JSX. Creating or removing
a topic in Studio changed nothing, and correcting the list meant a rebuild and
a redeploy. It now renders the published topic list. The old literal opened
with "Backend Architecture", which no record in the catalogue actually carries
— the profile was advertising a topic that did not exist, and nothing could
have caught that while the list lived in the markup.
The working-copy list gained a delete control. It routes by kind because the
contract and the storage both do: Case and Reference share one table split by
type, Question is its own. Decision has no delete — its lifecycle is accept,
reject, supersede, which records what happened rather than erasing it — so the
control does not appear for it.
The list summary carries no version, so deletion reads the working copy first
and uses the version it finds. A stale version from a list left open should
fail as a conflict, not delete whatever is there now.
The public site shipped a Releases page and a footer link to a release, and
neither could ever have content: the read path existed, the write path did not.
This adds the seven release operations to the contract contribution and the
gateway, and a Studio screen that can actually write one.
The editor is six markdown fields rather than one, because that is what the
contract models and what a release note is — why, what, what a reader notices,
what it leaves in the code, how it was verified, what is still open. Publishing
is separate from saving: a draft saves in any state, but the public query keys
on PUBLISHED alone, so publish is where completeness is demanded.
No new CSS. The screen reuses the document editor's field classes and the
working-copy list's row classes, so it inherits Studio's spacing and type
instead of introducing a second look.
The footer previously linked `/releases/0.1.0` — a version that did not exist,
so the link 404'd, and one that would have gone stale at 0.2.0 anyway. It now
points at the changelog index, which is the only place that knows what the
latest release is and which reads correctly when there are none.
Route inventory, navigation order, message catalog, manual accessibility
evidence, artifact baseline, and the pinned gate-shape digest all move with the
new route. The digest was recomputed by first reproducing the previous constant
from the previous gates.json, so the computation is known to be the one it was
pinned under.
Publishing needs a topic and nothing could create one. The backend now owns
that surface; this is its consumer — the management contract vendored, a
gateway over its nine operations, and one Studio screen that lists, creates,
and deletes topics and projects.
The screen adds no CSS. It reuses the classes the working-copy list already
uses, so it inherits Studio's spacing, type, and colour rather than growing a
second visual vocabulary beside them. Scope stops at list/create/delete:
renaming, phase changes, and visibility are implemented in the backend and
declared in the contract, but their screens are a separate design.
Two real defects surfaced while making the public port async, and both would
have shipped:
The search page and the header search dialog shared a query key. With an empty
query, `["tech-log","search",""]` was identical for both, so react-query
handed one surface the other's cache — different shapes — and the page died
reading a field that was not there. Keys now name the surface.
The explore filter's selects are uncontrolled and read `defaultValue`, which
React applies once. Their options arrive later now, so the first render had
nothing to match and the value stayed empty: a topic in the URL no longer
showed as selected. The form key includes whether the catalog has arrived, so
it remounts with the options present. Controlled inputs would be the other
answer, but this form submits to build a URL — the URL owns the value.
The route brought its own bookkeeping: a build chunk, a manual accessibility
evidence file, and the CI artifact baseline that counts them. The gate pins a
digest of its own shape precisely so a new route cannot slip in without that
count being reviewed.
Test harnesses that render public screens now assemble the query providers and
await the settled paint, because the screens they render became async.
Only the recorded source revision moves (55a9599 -> b98eaf9). The vendored
specs and the generated types are byte-identical, which is the useful part:
the envelope redefinition landed on a merge commit, not a schema change, so
nothing downstream has to move with it.
The public read port had one implementation and no way to add another. This is
the second one: the 18 operations of the public contract, mapped to the nine
methods the screens call.
The contract and the screens disagree about shape, and translating here is what
keeps the presentation components untouched. The server speaks in what it
stores — timestamps, one markdown body, relations grouped by why they relate.
The screens were built against a catalog that spoke in what a page renders —
formatted labels, titled sections, one flat relation list whose group name is
the reason. Neither is wrong. Where the contract has no counterpart the value is
left empty and the gap is named where it happens rather than guessed at: a
Case's verification line, a decision's consequences, a question's options.
Sections are split from markdown here rather than through the Studio parser.
That parser produces the canonical render-block union the editor needs — inline
marks, evidence directives, tables — which is a richer tree than RecordSection
can hold, so reusing it would mean flattening away exactly the blocks that made
it worth using.
A 404 is unwrapped, not thrown. A slug that is not published is an answer the
port already has a shape for, and throwing would put a terminal-error surface on
a page whose real state is "this does not exist".
`listRecords` is one method over two endpoints, because the contract pages and
filters knowledge separately from questions. Only the unfiltered call fans out:
asking for one kind must not pay for the other.
The operations declare the ANONYMOUS auth profile, which forbids credentials
outright. That is the point — a later change that starts sending the session
cookie on a public read fails the profile check instead of quietly making a
cache-friendly surface user-specific.
The public surface — 17 of the 28 registered routes — reads from a 29KB
TypeScript fixture and never touches the backend. `TECH_LOG_STUDIO_SOURCE`
only ever switched the Studio gateways; `publicContent` was wired to the
static adapter unconditionally, so no configuration could make the public
site show published content. This is the first half of closing that: the
contract and the switch, with the adapter still to come.
The generator now vendors both canonical contracts instead of one. They are
independent — different services on different schedules — so each carries
its own digest and operation list, and updating one leaves the other's drift
gate quiet.
`TECH_LOG_PUBLIC_SOURCE` is deliberately a second flag rather than a rename
of the Studio one. The combination that matters right now is exactly the one
a single flag cannot express: the authoring backend is live while the public
read API does not exist yet. production stays on MOCK for that reason —
pointing it at HTTP today would empty the live site — and moves when the
backend serves /api/v1/public.
Also records the compatibility evidence the registry gate wanted for the
Studio access change in fff5e6f. That gate has been failing since, which is
on me: the change was real and breaking, and it shipped without the note
explaining that route ids and schemas are untouched and only the access
classification moves.
Three defects found while running the release checklist against a live
backend, all on main.
1. Every TechLog route registered `access: "public"`, including the whole
Studio surface. `decideRouteAccessForDefinition` was therefore a no-op
for Studio: a signed-out visitor who typed /studio, /studio/documents,
or /studio/assets got the Studio shell rendered, and the page went on
to issue Studio API calls. Access is now derived from the spec's own
`layoutGroup`, so a newly added Studio route is gated by construction
rather than by remembering to restate it.
Verified against a production-profile build: /studio* now renders the
sign-in surface, / and /explore are unchanged, and after signing in
the router returns to the originally requested Studio screen.
2. `public/release-manifest.json` still declared the contract set at
2.0.0 while the vendored contract had moved to 3.0.0 (eb86708). Boot
verification fails closed on that mismatch, so `pnpm dev` served a
blank screen. Regenerated from the same producer `dist/` uses.
3. `release-manifest.test.ts` asserted the same stale 2.0.0. The literal
is deliberately independent of `EXPECTED_CONTRACT_SET_PACKAGES` (see
the comment above it), so it is updated in place, not derived.
Also drops a dead `= null` initializer that failed `no-useless-assignment`.
check:types, lint, check:architecture, check:tech-log-contract and
check:dev-release-manifest all pass. test:all is 1818 passed with one
pre-existing load-dependent flake (provider-guardian-transaction, passes
in isolation, untouched by this change).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
`corepack pnpm dev` did not boot. Plain `vite` serves
`public/release-manifest.json` verbatim, and that hand-maintained fixture still
declared `"packages": []` after the first real contract contribution was
registered. `verifyContractSet` runs unconditionally at boot — before any
adapter is chosen, so in the default `MOCK` mode as much as in `HTTP` — saw the
build had compiled `@tech-log/studio-contract` and failed closed with
`CONTRACT_SET_PACKAGE_MISSING`. Production builds were never affected:
`scripts/generate-build-manifest.ts` derives `dist/release-manifest.json`'s
block from the same composed set.
Editing the fixture by hand is not the fix — it had already gone stale twice,
once when the package first appeared and once when the contract moved 2.0.0 ->
3.0.0, because every regeneration changes the package digest. So
`generate:tech-log-contract` now refreshes the block itself, as its last step
and through a dynamic import so it reads the canonical source it just wrote.
`generate:dev-release-manifest` does the same refresh on its own.
The composed set can also change without the contract being regenerated — a
contribution added to or removed from `installed-contract-contributions.ts`
moves it. Tying the refresh to contract generation is therefore necessary but
not sufficient; the CI gate that follows is what closes that half.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Integrates the frontend template sync (a0fbafb → 5434760) into the TechLog UI
migration. Merged in this direction so every conflict is resolved and proved in
the worktree; main is only fast-forwarded afterwards and never holds a state
that was not verified here.
15 conflicts. The rule throughout: keep the template's mechanism, keep the
product's content, and never invent a third state neither branch would accept.
The template's product manifest and its runtime feature kill switch are adopted.
The route registry is deliberately not composed from contract.routes: the
reference feature still declares screens this product deleted, and reducing over
them would register paths with no component behind them. ROUTE_FEATURE_OWNER is
narrowed to registered routes for the same reason. The first resolution did
compose from contract.routes and was rejected by product-features.test.ts.
Three files pinned counts and a digest describing the gate contract. Neither
side's numbers describe the merged config/ci/gates.json, so they were recomputed
from it rather than chosen: 27 gates, 82 commands, 94 command references, 107
evidence references, 128 artifacts, shape sha256 5063586d.
README.md and docs/accessibility/manual-checklist.md now enumerate this
product's 27 routes, which the template's own verify:documentation requires.
product-feature-switch.test.tsx was rewritten around the invariant that still
applies here — no registered route without a component — rather than deleted
with the screens it used to exercise.
docs/operations/template-merge-2026-08-17.md records every decision, the gate
results, and the three follow-ups this merge deliberately did not decide.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Carries eight template commits: the provider sandbox actually running, release
admission to a named environment, the product feature manifest with its runtime
kill switch, architecture and documentation rules that match what is enforced,
the removability fixtures, and the browser, visual and performance evidence.
Product identity is unchanged. `package.json` keeps `tech-log-frontend` and the
catalog keeps the Tech Log naming; the home page was not in the delta. The
visual baselines are this product's own — the template's were excluded from the
transplant and these were regenerated here, where the only difference is the
platform overview's new product-feature section.
What this repository gains operationally: `config/runtime/{local,development,
staging,production}.json` with `FE-GATE-027` refusing an artifact whose runtime
document does not match the environment it is being admitted to, and
`FEATURE_OVERRIDES` for taking an installed feature out of service without a
rebuild.
Verified here: eight gates green, build green, visual 5/5, and 1,858 of 1,859
tests in the suites that do not need a sandbox — the one failure passes in
isolation and is a jsdom lazy-chunk timeout under parallel load. The provider
suites cannot run on this machine at all: `kernel.apparmor_restrict_unprivileged
_userns=1` makes `bwrap --unshare-net` fail, reproducible without any code from
either repository.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
