Two things an author could not control from Studio.
The profile's "주요 관심 주제" was four strings in the JSX. Creating or removing
a topic in Studio changed nothing, and correcting the list meant a rebuild and
a redeploy. It now renders the published topic list. The old literal opened
with "Backend Architecture", which no record in the catalogue actually carries
— the profile was advertising a topic that did not exist, and nothing could
have caught that while the list lived in the markup.
The working-copy list gained a delete control. It routes by kind because the
contract and the storage both do: Case and Reference share one table split by
type, Question is its own. Decision has no delete — its lifecycle is accept,
reject, supersede, which records what happened rather than erasing it — so the
control does not appear for it.
The list summary carries no version, so deletion reads the working copy first
and uses the version it finds. A stale version from a list left open should
fail as a conflict, not delete whatever is there now.
The public site shipped a Releases page and a footer link to a release, and
neither could ever have content: the read path existed, the write path did not.
This adds the seven release operations to the contract contribution and the
gateway, and a Studio screen that can actually write one.
The editor is six markdown fields rather than one, because that is what the
contract models and what a release note is — why, what, what a reader notices,
what it leaves in the code, how it was verified, what is still open. Publishing
is separate from saving: a draft saves in any state, but the public query keys
on PUBLISHED alone, so publish is where completeness is demanded.
No new CSS. The screen reuses the document editor's field classes and the
working-copy list's row classes, so it inherits Studio's spacing and type
instead of introducing a second look.
The footer previously linked `/releases/0.1.0` — a version that did not exist,
so the link 404'd, and one that would have gone stale at 0.2.0 anyway. It now
points at the changelog index, which is the only place that knows what the
latest release is and which reads correctly when there are none.
Route inventory, navigation order, message catalog, manual accessibility
evidence, artifact baseline, and the pinned gate-shape digest all move with the
new route. The digest was recomputed by first reproducing the previous constant
from the previous gates.json, so the computation is known to be the one it was
pinned under.
Publishing needs a topic and nothing could create one. The backend now owns
that surface; this is its consumer — the management contract vendored, a
gateway over its nine operations, and one Studio screen that lists, creates,
and deletes topics and projects.
The screen adds no CSS. It reuses the classes the working-copy list already
uses, so it inherits Studio's spacing, type, and colour rather than growing a
second visual vocabulary beside them. Scope stops at list/create/delete:
renaming, phase changes, and visibility are implemented in the backend and
declared in the contract, but their screens are a separate design.
Two real defects surfaced while making the public port async, and both would
have shipped:
The search page and the header search dialog shared a query key. With an empty
query, `["tech-log","search",""]` was identical for both, so react-query
handed one surface the other's cache — different shapes — and the page died
reading a field that was not there. Keys now name the surface.
The explore filter's selects are uncontrolled and read `defaultValue`, which
React applies once. Their options arrive later now, so the first render had
nothing to match and the value stayed empty: a topic in the URL no longer
showed as selected. The form key includes whether the catalog has arrived, so
it remounts with the options present. Controlled inputs would be the other
answer, but this form submits to build a URL — the URL owns the value.
The route brought its own bookkeeping: a build chunk, a manual accessibility
evidence file, and the CI artifact baseline that counts them. The gate pins a
digest of its own shape precisely so a new route cannot slip in without that
count being reviewed.
Test harnesses that render public screens now assemble the query providers and
await the settled paint, because the screens they render became async.
DongHyeonka