공개 화면 다섯 곳이 조용히 비어 있었다. 원인은 하나씩 달랐지만 모두 "값을 채울
방법이 없었다"는 같은 모양이었다.
홈의 "지금 집중하는 것" — `home_focus_config` 는 마이그레이션이 빈 행 하나만
넣어 두었고, 계약에 선언된 `getHomeFocus`/`updateHomeFocus` 는 구현이 없었다.
세 슬롯이 모두 비면 홈은 그 영역을 아예 그리지 않으므로, 운영에서는 한 번도
나타난 적이 없다. Studio 대시보드에 고르는 화면을 둔다.
홈의 "최근 기록" — 화면이 공개된 프로젝트를 하나씩 돌며 타임라인을 조립했다.
그래서 게시한 문서라도 그 프로젝트가 공개되어 있지 않으면 목록에서 통째로
빠졌고, 실제로 릴리스 한 줄만 남았다. 무엇이 최근인지는 공개 투영이 이미 알고
있으므로 그것을 그대로 읽는다. 프로젝트마다 요청을 보내던 N+1 도 사라진다.
프로젝트 공개 — 프로젝트는 `RecordKind` 에 없어 문서 게시 파이프라인을 타지
못하는데, 공개 화면들(프로젝트 목록·프로필의 "현재 프로젝트"·홈 focus)은 전부
`public_resource_projection` 의 PROJECT 행을 가시성 관문으로 쓴다. 그 행을
세우는 경로가 없었으므로 프로젝트는 영원히 비공개였다. 계약에 이미 있던
`publishProject`/`unpublishProject` 를 구현하고 주제·프로젝트 화면에 버튼을 둔다.
문서 사이 관계 연결 — `JdbcCatalogQueryAdapter` 의 RELATION/EVIDENCE 가
`List.of()` 스텁이라 어떤 기록도 연결 대상 목록을 채울 수 없었다. RELATION 은
작성 중에 고르는 것이므로 작업본까지 포함하고, EVIDENCE 는 읽는 사람이 따라갈
수 있어야 하므로 공개된 것만 포함한다.
본문 너비 — 문서 한 편이 세 폭으로 갈라져 있었다. 머리말 920px, 유형·프로젝트
줄은 shell 전체 1180px, 본문은 672px 를 가운데 정렬. 셋을 같은 폭·같은 왼쪽
끝에 세우고 읽는 단을 56rem 으로 넓힌다.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01XEHXspz4rv5pB5wiiSsVDu
The 16 sandboxed provider tests in `tests/unit/ci-artifact-contract.test.ts`
fail wherever unprivileged user namespaces are denied. bubblewrap is installed
and answers `--version`, but `bwrap --unshare-net … -- /bin/true` exits 1 with
`bwrap: loopback: Failed RTM_NEWADDR: Operation not permitted`, and it fails the
same way with no netns flag at all (`setting up uid map: Permission denied`), so
this is the whole nested-userns capability and not one option. Sixteen
assertion errors on every local run buried whatever else the file had to say.
`scripts/lib/provider-sandbox-probe.ts` now runs a trivial command under the
real isolation options — `runProviderInSandbox` spreads the same
`PROVIDER_SANDBOX_ISOLATION_ARGUMENTS`, and a test fails if an isolation option
is added to the run without the probe having to clear it. Capability is
measured, never inferred from the binary existing or from a version string;
both would pass here.
An unusable sandbox means two different things in two places, so the decision
is explicit. Locally it is an environment fact: the affected tests skip and
carry the bwrap diagnostic as their skip note, visible as `↓ … [reason]`. In CI
it is a regression — a security gate that silently stopped running is exactly
what these tests exist to catch — so the same probe result fails the run
through one guard test that says "the provider sandbox is unavailable" instead
of sixteen assertion errors.
CI is detected with `CI === "true"` via a new `isCiRun`, sharing the predicate
that already gates `ciBuildEnvironmentFailures`. The workflow sets it at the
top-level `env:` block, so it holds in every job; `CI_RUN_ID` and its
`GITEA_`/`GITHUB_` fallbacks are declared only by the release-tier provider
jobs and are absent from the merge gates that run this file, so keying on them
would have left the CI branch permanently dead.
The three `it.each` groups become `it.for` because only `.for` passes the test
context, which is what carries the skip note.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Carries eight template commits: the provider sandbox actually running, release
admission to a named environment, the product feature manifest with its runtime
kill switch, architecture and documentation rules that match what is enforced,
the removability fixtures, and the browser, visual and performance evidence.
Product identity is unchanged. `package.json` keeps `tech-log-frontend` and the
catalog keeps the Tech Log naming; the home page was not in the delta. The
visual baselines are this product's own — the template's were excluded from the
transplant and these were regenerated here, where the only difference is the
platform overview's new product-feature section.
What this repository gains operationally: `config/runtime/{local,development,
staging,production}.json` with `FE-GATE-027` refusing an artifact whose runtime
document does not match the environment it is being admitted to, and
`FEATURE_OVERRIDES` for taking an installed feature out of service without a
rebuild.
Verified here: eight gates green, build green, visual 5/5, and 1,858 of 1,859
tests in the suites that do not need a sandbox — the one failure passes in
isolation and is a jsdom lazy-chunk timeout under parallel load. The provider
suites cannot run on this machine at all: `kernel.apparmor_restrict_unprivileged
_userns=1` makes `bwrap --unshare-net` fail, reproducible without any code from
either repository.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The product was materialized from the template at `4dc033c` and has stayed
on it through 43 template commits, so it was missing all three rounds of
adapter remediation — including files it never had, such as the shared
`abortable-operation` primitive and the `exact-snapshot` decoder that
later fixes are written against. Taking only the newest round was not
possible for that reason: the delta is coherent only as a whole.
The product had not touched `src/adapters` at all since materialization,
so the 140-file delta applied with a three-way merge and no conflicts.
`package.json` was the single overlap and merged cleanly: the product owns
`name`, the template contributed `check:adapter-inventory`,
`check:remediation-ledger` and the image-resolve-signal type fixture.
All 24 product-owned files — README, index.html, CI workflow, i18n
catalog, home page, generated schemas, evidence scripts, component and
visual snapshots — are byte-identical to `main`.
`template.lock.json` now pins the synced revision and tree.
Verified in this repository, not inherited from the template: six type
projects, lint, nine gates (adapter inventory, remediation ledger,
registries, diagnostics, realtime boundaries, architecture, browser
file/storage boundaries, optional recipes, documentation), the production
build, and 2,054 of 2,073 tests. The 19 failures are all in
`tests/unit/ci-artifact-contract.test.ts` and are the same pre-existing
sandbox RLIMIT, EMFILE, umask and `/tmp` permission behaviour the template
records; four suites that failed once under parallel load pass in
isolation.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
