Commit Graph
6 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
DongHyeonkaandClaude Opus 5 ef17bca445 test: regenerate the 7 goldens stale from the evidence-figure width fix
79e9aa8 ("fix: align TechLog article content widths") narrowed
.evidence-figure/.code-block/.data-table-wrap from
min(61rem, calc(100% + 15rem)) to min(var(--body-copy), 100%), shrinking
every page whose article body contains an evidence-figure diagram. The
goldens were never refreshed after that commit landed, so test:visual
carried 13 failures inherited from main.

Per-failure diff inspection (not just the aggregate count) showed the 13
split into two unrelated causes:

- 7 are a pure dimensional consequence of the width rule -- full-page
  diffs starting at the evidence-figure diagram, page height down by a
  fixed ~93px offset in matched pairs. Regenerated here:
    tech-log-case-1440                              6506 -> 6412
    tech-log-public-fixture-cases-collection-...     6506 -> 6412
    tech-log-studio-document-preview-1440            1904 -> 1811
    tech-log-studio-current-preview-1440             1904 -> 1811
    tech-log-studio-publication-preview-1440         1687 -> 1594
    tech-log-studio-publication-snapshot-1440        1687 -> 1594
    tech-log-studio-immediate-preview-1440           1733 -> 1640

- 6 are unrelated content staleness from a later commit
  (0355b64, "feat: add TechLog project decision authoring") that added a
  "Decision" document type/option without refreshing its goldens. These
  are left failing intentionally -- they are not a dimensional
  consequence of 79e9aa8 and regenerating them here would silently bake
  an unreviewed content change into the baseline:
    tech-log-studio-documents-360/1440,
    tech-log-studio-document-new-360/1440,
    tech-log-studio-document-list-1440, tech-log-studio-new-document-1440

test:visual: 13 failed/117 passed -> 124 passed/6 failed (the 6 above).
lint and check:types unaffected.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-18 12:35:22 +09:00
DongHyeonkaandClaude Opus 5 813f9e16cd test: regenerate only the five goldens this branch actually changed
Attribution was measured, not inferred: the visual suite was run at the
merge-base `9e5fbd1` in a detached checkout (13 failed / 117 passed) and the
`-actual.png` each run produced was compared by SHA-256 against HEAD's. For
13 of the 18 failures the rendered bytes at HEAD and at the merge-base are
identical, so those failures belong to `main`, not here.

Regenerated (all Case-editor surfaces, all grown by the Task 10 Asset panel;
the +293px band was inspected in the new golden and is the "EVIDENCE / 본문에
Asset 삽입" panel):

  tech-log-studio-document-edit-360    360x3313  -> 360x3627
  tech-log-studio-document-edit-1440   1440x2706 -> 1440x2999
  tech-log-studio-case-editor-1440     1440x2706 -> 1440x2999
  tech-log-studio-conflict-editor-1440 1440x2706 -> 1440x2999
  tech-log-studio-dirty-leave-dialog-1440 1440x2706 -> 1440x2999

`--update-snapshots` was restricted to those five tests with `--grep`; a
blanket update would have absorbed the 13 inherited failures and destroyed
the distinction. `test:visual` now reports 13 failed / 117 passed, exactly
the merge-base's set.

Two earlier records are corrected in the spec: the five "pixel-only, not
investigated" failures are all inherited, and `TECH_LOG_STUDIO_DOCUMENT_NEW`
360px was wrongly attributed to the Asset Picker -- it fails at the
merge-base with the identical 28,413 differing pixels.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-18 09:29:46 +09:00
DongHyeonka 3a7c5deca0 fix: complete TechLog migration evidence 2026-08-16 04:55:52 +09:00
DongHyeonka 6c2780b7a7 test: prove TechLog UI migration parity 2026-08-16 02:48:26 +09:00
DongHyeonka 002ba3624e chore: complete tech log product identity 2026-08-13 18:53:52 +09:00
DongHyeonka 40107eec84 chore: initialize from frontend template 4dc033c 2026-08-13 18:23:26 +09:00