Three defects found while running the release checklist against a live
backend, all on main.
1. Every TechLog route registered `access: "public"`, including the whole
Studio surface. `decideRouteAccessForDefinition` was therefore a no-op
for Studio: a signed-out visitor who typed /studio, /studio/documents,
or /studio/assets got the Studio shell rendered, and the page went on
to issue Studio API calls. Access is now derived from the spec's own
`layoutGroup`, so a newly added Studio route is gated by construction
rather than by remembering to restate it.
Verified against a production-profile build: /studio* now renders the
sign-in surface, / and /explore are unchanged, and after signing in
the router returns to the originally requested Studio screen.
2. `public/release-manifest.json` still declared the contract set at
2.0.0 while the vendored contract had moved to 3.0.0 (eb86708). Boot
verification fails closed on that mismatch, so `pnpm dev` served a
blank screen. Regenerated from the same producer `dist/` uses.
3. `release-manifest.test.ts` asserted the same stale 2.0.0. The literal
is deliberately independent of `EXPECTED_CONTRACT_SET_PACKAGES` (see
the comment above it), so it is updated in place, not derived.
Also drops a dead `= null` initializer that failed `no-useless-assignment`.
check:types, lint, check:architecture, check:tech-log-contract and
check:dev-release-manifest all pass. test:all is 1818 passed with one
pre-existing load-dependent flake (provider-guardian-transaction, passes
in isolation, untouched by this change).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
`corepack pnpm dev` did not boot. Plain `vite` serves
`public/release-manifest.json` verbatim, and that hand-maintained fixture still
declared `"packages": []` after the first real contract contribution was
registered. `verifyContractSet` runs unconditionally at boot — before any
adapter is chosen, so in the default `MOCK` mode as much as in `HTTP` — saw the
build had compiled `@tech-log/studio-contract` and failed closed with
`CONTRACT_SET_PACKAGE_MISSING`. Production builds were never affected:
`scripts/generate-build-manifest.ts` derives `dist/release-manifest.json`'s
block from the same composed set.
Editing the fixture by hand is not the fix — it had already gone stale twice,
once when the package first appeared and once when the contract moved 2.0.0 ->
3.0.0, because every regeneration changes the package digest. So
`generate:tech-log-contract` now refreshes the block itself, as its last step
and through a dynamic import so it reads the canonical source it just wrote.
`generate:dev-release-manifest` does the same refresh on its own.
The composed set can also change without the contract being regenerated — a
contribution added to or removed from `installed-contract-contributions.ts`
moves it. Tying the refresh to contract generation is therefore necessary but
not sufficient; the CI gate that follows is what closes that half.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
