The keycloak project ended with four open questions that design could not
settle. A two-VM lab was built to answer them by measurement, and this is
that material: 26 experiments, 125 raw command outputs, 22 browser captures.
Follows the import procedure in README.md.
source/ the originating repository verbatim — 78 documents, 28 SVGs,
8 manifests, plus .source-revision recording the commit
final/ the SSOT
document.md 729 lines written from the 29 experiment documents, not
concatenated: what was predicted, what was measured, and
where the measurement itself was wrong
evidence/raw 125 outputs, flattened to <experiment>__<file> because
the originals collided (01-baseline.txt appeared three
times) and the audit only globs the top level
evidence/meta one per raw file; command and exitCode are null and the
README says why rather than inventing them
evidence/browser 22 captures
assets/ three diagrams through techviz
.techviz/ their VizSpecs
A separate project rather than an addition to keycloak: the B-layer answers
that project's four questions, but the A, C and D layers are about cluster
failure, SSO and operations, and one document.md should hold one subject.
The four question records there can point here through 관계.
Recorded rather than papered over: only three of the 28 diagrams were
remade. The repository forbids hand-drawn SVG and forbids titles inside the
canvas; all 28 originals carry both, so converting them is redrawing, not
reformatting. They stay in source/ and the gap is written into the document.
verify-pipeline.py passes. audit-records.py reports no issues.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
16 lines
927 B
Plaintext
16 lines
927 B
Plaintext
|
|
```groovy
|
|
api project(':grpc:grpc-core-api') // import 0
|
|
api project(':grpc:grpc-client') // import 0
|
|
api project(':grpc-advanced:grpc-advanced-bootstrap') // import 4줄
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
리프의 자바 4파일이 갖는 `dev.caskeleton` import 는 넷뿐이고 전부 bootstrap 것이다.
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
GrpcAdvancedInfrastructureTestkit.java:3 GrpcAdvancedCapability
|
|
GrpcChannelDiagnosticsPolicy.java:3,4,5 GrpcAdvancedCapability · GrpcAdvancedFeatureFlags · GrpcAdvancedModuleGuard
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
`grpc-client` 는 특히 눈에 띈다 — Channelz 진단이 채널을 다루는 주제이므로 의존 선언은 자연스럽게 읽히는데, 이 리프의 스냅숏은 채널 타입을 쓰지 않고 `String channelProfile` 과 `String connectivityState` 로 받는다. 진단 값 객체가 채널 타입에서 독립적인 것 자체는 설계로 읽히고, 그렇다면 남은 것은 쓰이지 않는 의존 선언이다.
|