DongHyeonkaandClaude Opus 5
b2963105a8
The keycloak project ended with four open questions that design could not
settle. A two-VM lab was built to answer them by measurement, and this is
that material: 26 experiments, 125 raw command outputs, 22 browser captures.
Follows the import procedure in README.md.
source/ the originating repository verbatim — 78 documents, 28 SVGs,
8 manifests, plus .source-revision recording the commit
final/ the SSOT
document.md 729 lines written from the 29 experiment documents, not
concatenated: what was predicted, what was measured, and
where the measurement itself was wrong
evidence/raw 125 outputs, flattened to <experiment>__<file> because
the originals collided (01-baseline.txt appeared three
times) and the audit only globs the top level
evidence/meta one per raw file; command and exitCode are null and the
README says why rather than inventing them
evidence/browser 22 captures
assets/ three diagrams through techviz
.techviz/ their VizSpecs
A separate project rather than an addition to keycloak: the B-layer answers
that project's four questions, but the A, C and D layers are about cluster
failure, SSO and operations, and one document.md should hold one subject.
The four question records there can point here through 관계.
Recorded rather than papered over: only three of the 28 diagrams were
remade. The repository forbids hand-drawn SVG and forbids titles inside the
canvas; all 28 originals carry both, so converting them is redrawing, not
reformatting. They stay in source/ and the gap is written into the document.
verify-pipeline.py passes. audit-records.py reports no issues.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
52 lines
3.5 KiB
Plaintext
52 lines
3.5 KiB
Plaintext
# 가드가 식별자를 찾는 방식
|
|
49: public boolean usesIdentityGeneration(Class<?> entityType) {
|
|
50: return identifierField(entityType)
|
|
51: .map(field -> field.getAnnotation(GeneratedValue.class))
|
|
52: .filter(Objects::nonNull)
|
|
53: .map(generated -> generated.strategy() == GenerationType.IDENTITY)
|
|
54: .orElse(false);
|
|
55: }
|
|
56:
|
|
57: /**
|
|
58: * Finds the {@code @Id} field, walking superclasses.
|
|
59: *
|
|
60: * <p>Superclasses are walked because a mapped superclass carrying the identifier is the common
|
|
61: * shape; stopping at the declared class would silently classify every such entity as "not
|
|
62: * identity" and let the guard pass on exactly the entities it was written for.
|
|
63: */
|
|
64: private static Optional<Field> identifierField(Class<?> entityType) {
|
|
65: for (Class<?> current = entityType;
|
|
66: current != null && current != Object.class;
|
|
67: current = current.getSuperclass()) {
|
|
68: for (Field field : current.getDeclaredFields()) {
|
|
69: if (field.isAnnotationPresent(Id.class)) {
|
|
70: return Optional.of(field);
|
|
71: }
|
|
72: }
|
|
73: }
|
|
74: return Optional.empty();
|
|
75: }
|
|
|
|
# 이 타입을 언급하는 곳 전부 (자기 파일 포함)
|
|
adapter/outbound/persistence-jpa/src/postgresqlIntegrationTest/java/dev/caskeleton/adapter/outbound/persistence/platform/IdStrategyContractTest.java:18: * <p>This is the measurement behind {@code HibernateBatchConfigurationGuard}. The guard refuses an
|
|
adapter/outbound/persistence-jpa/src/test/java/dev/caskeleton/adapter/outbound/persistence/hibernate/batch/HibernateBatchConfigurationGuardTest.java:14: private final HibernateBatchConfigurationGuard guard = new HibernateBatchConfigurationGuard();
|
|
adapter/outbound/persistence-jpa/src/main/java/dev/caskeleton/adapter/outbound/persistence/hibernate/batch/HibernateBatchConfigurationGuard.java:23:public final class HibernateBatchConfigurationGuard {
|
|
adapter/outbound/persistence-jpa/src/testkit/java/dev/caskeleton/adapter/outbound/persistence/testkit/id/IdentityEntity.java:16: * HibernateBatchConfigurationGuard} uses the same fact to refuse a batch profile that targets it.
|
|
# 그 타입을 인스턴스화하는 main 코드: 0
|
|
# 같은 패키지의 프로파일 레지스트리를 읽는 main 코드: 0
|
|
# 계획 문서가 이 과제의 산출물로 적은 것
|
|
2937:- Produces: Named batch profiles and startup diagnostics for IDENTITY and sequence mismatch.
|
|
|
|
# 가드가 거절하려는 전략이 main 에 나타나는 곳
|
|
adapter/outbound/persistence-jpa/src/main/java/dev/caskeleton/adapter/outbound/persistence/hibernate/batch/HibernateBatchConfigurationGuard.java:13: * <p>The case that matters is {@link GenerationType#IDENTITY}. An identity column's value is
|
|
adapter/outbound/persistence-jpa/src/main/java/dev/caskeleton/adapter/outbound/persistence/hibernate/batch/HibernateBatchConfigurationGuard.java:42: + " uses GenerationType.IDENTITY, and IDENTITY disables insert batching: Hibernate"
|
|
adapter/outbound/persistence-jpa/src/main/java/dev/caskeleton/adapter/outbound/persistence/hibernate/batch/HibernateBatchConfigurationGuard.java:53: .map(generated -> generated.strategy() == GenerationType.IDENTITY)
|
|
# main 에서 @GeneratedValue 를 쓰는 줄: 0
|
|
|
|
# 출하 엔티티의 식별자 접근 방식
|
|
# main 의 @Entity 파일: 32
|
|
# 그중 @Id 를 필드에 단 파일: 27
|
|
# @Id 바로 뒤가 메서드 선언인 것 (프로퍼티 접근): 0
|
|
# @Access 나 AccessType 을 쓰는 줄 (저장소 전체): 0
|
|
# @EmbeddedId 를 쓰는 main 파일: LiveEventEntity.java
|