DongHyeonkaandClaude Opus 5
b2963105a8
The keycloak project ended with four open questions that design could not
settle. A two-VM lab was built to answer them by measurement, and this is
that material: 26 experiments, 125 raw command outputs, 22 browser captures.
Follows the import procedure in README.md.
source/ the originating repository verbatim — 78 documents, 28 SVGs,
8 manifests, plus .source-revision recording the commit
final/ the SSOT
document.md 729 lines written from the 29 experiment documents, not
concatenated: what was predicted, what was measured, and
where the measurement itself was wrong
evidence/raw 125 outputs, flattened to <experiment>__<file> because
the originals collided (01-baseline.txt appeared three
times) and the audit only globs the top level
evidence/meta one per raw file; command and exitCode are null and the
README says why rather than inventing them
evidence/browser 22 captures
assets/ three diagrams through techviz
.techviz/ their VizSpecs
A separate project rather than an addition to keycloak: the B-layer answers
that project's four questions, but the A, C and D layers are about cluster
failure, SSO and operations, and one document.md should hold one subject.
The four question records there can point here through 관계.
Recorded rather than papered over: only three of the 28 diagrams were
remade. The repository forbids hand-drawn SVG and forbids titles inside the
canvas; all 28 originals carry both, so converting them is redrawing, not
reformatting. They stay in source/ and the gap is written into the document.
verify-pipeline.py passes. audit-records.py reports no issues.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
47 lines
2.4 KiB
Markdown
47 lines
2.4 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
kind: CONCEPT
|
|
slug: app-bootstrap-c02
|
|
title: 런타임 멤버십이 결정하는 어댑터 활성화 스위치 범위
|
|
topic: capability-and-disclosure-models
|
|
project: clean-architecture-backend-template
|
|
status: 게시 전
|
|
sourceRevision: 21234e38cdb9a926cbc92bb97a2aee2e4a7d2916
|
|
rootTreeNode: concept:app-bootstrap-c02
|
|
evidenceCapturedOn: 2026-09-01
|
|
assets:
|
|
- key: app-bootstrap-c02
|
|
file: ../../../final/evidence/rendered/app-bootstrap-c02.svg
|
|
evidence:
|
|
- ../../../final/evidence/raw/app-bootstrap-c02.txt
|
|
source:
|
|
- 원본 분석 절은 analysis/18-app-bootstrap.md#L185 이다.
|
|
module: app-bootstrap
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# 런타임 멤버십이 결정하는 어댑터 활성화 스위치 범위
|
|
|
|
`src/config/architecture/modules.json`의 `runtime_memberships`가 인바운드 어댑터의 런타임 포함 여부를 결정한다. gRPC와 WebSocket은 build-only leaf라 런타임 멤버십이 없고, `MasterSwitch`·`env-keys.yaml`·`AdapterActivationReport`에 활성화 스위치가 없는 상태가 이 모델과 일치한다.
|
|
|
|
## 본문
|
|
|
|
<!-- body:start -->
|
|
|
|
## build-only 전송의 런타임 멤버십
|
|
|
|
`adapter-inbound-grpc`와 `adapter-inbound-websocket`의 `runtime_memberships`는 비어 있다. `ConditionalTransportCompositionContractTest`도 두 leaf가 어떤 런타임에도 올라가지 않아야 한다는 계약을 강제한다.
|
|
|
|
## MasterSwitch 참조 위치
|
|
|
|
:::evidence key="app-bootstrap-c02" alt="코드베이스에서 MasterSwitch 를 검색한 출력 17줄. 이 기록이 세는 참조가 그 출력에 그대로 보인다." caption="MasterSwitch 코드베이스 검색 — 17줄 · exit 0" zoom="true"
|
|
:::
|
|
|
|
## 멤버십과 활성화 스위치의 관계
|
|
|
|
런타임에 포함되지 않는 build-only 어댑터에는 운영자가 켜고 끌 활성화 스위치가 필요하지 않다. 따라서 gRPC와 WebSocket이 `MasterSwitch`·`env-keys.yaml`·`AdapterActivationReport`에 없는 것은 누락이 아니라 런타임 멤버십 모델과 일치한다.
|
|
|
|
## 별도로 남는 web 경계
|
|
|
|
`adapter-inbound-web`은 `["app-bootstrap", "sample-portfolio"]` 두 런타임에 포함된다. `backend.web.mvc.enabled`, `backend.web.webflux.enabled`, `backend.web.budgets.enabled`, `app.web-platform.durable-operations.enabled`는 `MasterSwitch`와 `env-keys.yaml` 341개 키에 포함되지 않는다. 이 경계는 같은 분석의 §4.1b에서 별도 finding으로 다룬다.
|
|
|
|
<!-- body:end -->
|