DongHyeonkaandClaude Opus 5
b2963105a8
The keycloak project ended with four open questions that design could not
settle. A two-VM lab was built to answer them by measurement, and this is
that material: 26 experiments, 125 raw command outputs, 22 browser captures.
Follows the import procedure in README.md.
source/ the originating repository verbatim — 78 documents, 28 SVGs,
8 manifests, plus .source-revision recording the commit
final/ the SSOT
document.md 729 lines written from the 29 experiment documents, not
concatenated: what was predicted, what was measured, and
where the measurement itself was wrong
evidence/raw 125 outputs, flattened to <experiment>__<file> because
the originals collided (01-baseline.txt appeared three
times) and the audit only globs the top level
evidence/meta one per raw file; command and exitCode are null and the
README says why rather than inventing them
evidence/browser 22 captures
assets/ three diagrams through techviz
.techviz/ their VizSpecs
A separate project rather than an addition to keycloak: the B-layer answers
that project's four questions, but the A, C and D layers are about cluster
failure, SSO and operations, and one document.md should hold one subject.
The four question records there can point here through 관계.
Recorded rather than papered over: only three of the 28 diagrams were
remade. The repository forbids hand-drawn SVG and forbids titles inside the
canvas; all 28 originals carry both, so converting them is redrawing, not
reformatting. They stay in source/ and the gap is written into the document.
verify-pipeline.py passes. audit-records.py reports no issues.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
51 lines
2.2 KiB
Markdown
51 lines
2.2 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
kind: CONCEPT
|
|
slug: grpc-advanced-resilience-c02
|
|
title: xDS 시작 가드
|
|
topic: delivery-and-settlement-models
|
|
project: clean-architecture-backend-template
|
|
status: 게시 전
|
|
sourceRevision: 21234e38cdb9a926cbc92bb97a2aee2e4a7d2916
|
|
rootTreeNode: concept:grpc-advanced-resilience-c02
|
|
evidenceCapturedOn: 2026-09-01
|
|
assets:
|
|
- key: grpc-advanced-resilience-c02
|
|
file: ../../../final/evidence/rendered/grpc-advanced-resilience-c02.svg
|
|
evidence:
|
|
- ../../../final/evidence/raw/grpc-advanced-resilience-c02.txt
|
|
source:
|
|
- 원본 분석 절은 analysis/grpc/grpc-advanced-resilience.md#L75 이다.
|
|
module: grpc-advanced-resilience
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# xDS 시작 가드
|
|
|
|
두 거절이 있고 javadoc 이 둘째를 더 중요하다고 적는다. 시작 차단 사유는 둘 — 능력이 사용 가능하지 않음, 그리고 애플리케이션이 재시도 정책을 함께 정의함.
|
|
|
|
## 본문
|
|
|
|
<!-- body:start -->
|
|
|
|
두 거절이 있고 javadoc 이 둘째를 더 중요하다고 적는다.
|
|
|
|
> "xDS working in a deployment is not the same claim as the platform supporting it: it brings a control plane, its outage modes, its own security boundary and its own version skew, and the Stable support statement covers DNS and static targets. A support matrix that quietly widens is a support matrix nobody can rely on."
|
|
|
|
## 시작을 막는 두 사유
|
|
|
|
능력이 사용 가능하지 않음, 그리고 애플리케이션이 재시도 정책을 함께 정의함이다.
|
|
|
|
> "with xDS the control plane owns it, and defining it in both places makes the winner depend on resolution order"
|
|
|
|
## 이 기록이 다루는 범위
|
|
|
|
:::evidence key="grpc-advanced-resilience-c02" alt="코드베이스에서 파일 목록을 만든 출력 16줄. 이 기록이 다루는 범위가 그 목록이다." caption="코드베이스 파일 목록 — 16줄 · exit 0" zoom="true"
|
|
:::
|
|
|
|
## 부트스트랩 대조가 보는 세 가지
|
|
|
|
`xds_servers` 선언, 통제 평면 채널의 TLS, 프로파일의 자원 이름공간이다.
|
|
|
|
> "a client whose bootstrap names a namespace the deployment did not configure subscribes successfully and receives another team's routing. Nothing errors — the control plane answers, the resources parse, and traffic goes somewhere nobody chose."
|
|
|
|
<!-- body:end -->
|