DongHyeonkaandClaude Opus 5
b2963105a8
The keycloak project ended with four open questions that design could not
settle. A two-VM lab was built to answer them by measurement, and this is
that material: 26 experiments, 125 raw command outputs, 22 browser captures.
Follows the import procedure in README.md.
source/ the originating repository verbatim — 78 documents, 28 SVGs,
8 manifests, plus .source-revision recording the commit
final/ the SSOT
document.md 729 lines written from the 29 experiment documents, not
concatenated: what was predicted, what was measured, and
where the measurement itself was wrong
evidence/raw 125 outputs, flattened to <experiment>__<file> because
the originals collided (01-baseline.txt appeared three
times) and the audit only globs the top level
evidence/meta one per raw file; command and exitCode are null and the
README says why rather than inventing them
evidence/browser 22 captures
assets/ three diagrams through techviz
.techviz/ their VizSpecs
A separate project rather than an addition to keycloak: the B-layer answers
that project's four questions, but the A, C and D layers are about cluster
failure, SSO and operations, and one document.md should hold one subject.
The four question records there can point here through 관계.
Recorded rather than papered over: only three of the 28 diagrams were
remade. The repository forbids hand-drawn SVG and forbids titles inside the
canvas; all 28 originals carry both, so converting them is redrawing, not
reformatting. They stay in source/ and the gap is written into the document.
verify-pipeline.py passes. audit-records.py reports no issues.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2.4 KiB
kind, slug, title, topic, project, status, sourceRevision, rootTreeNode, evidenceCapturedOn, assets, evidence, source, module
| kind | slug | title | topic | project | status | sourceRevision | rootTreeNode | evidenceCapturedOn | assets | evidence | source | module | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CONCEPT | adapter-outbound-persistence-jpa-c45 | V3와 V4는 registry revision을 올리지 않는다 | schema-and-wire-models | clean-architecture-backend-template | 게시 전 | 21234e38cdb9a926cbc92bb97a2aee2e4a7d2916 | concept:adapter-outbound-persistence-jpa-c45 | 2026-09-01 |
|
|
|
adapter-outbound-persistence-jpa |
V3와 V4는 registry revision을 올리지 않는다
Fileserver persistence는 opt-in production capability이고, migration V3·V4가 registry revision을 갱신하지 않는 차이가 뒤따르는 startup fail-open finding의 직접 원인이다.
본문
Fileserver persistence는 latent helper가 아니라 실제 opt-in production capability다. PersistenceJpaRootAutoConfiguration이 FileserverJpaPersistenceConfig를 import한다.
PersistenceJpaRootAutoConfiguration 참조 위치
:::evidence key="adapter-outbound-persistence-jpa-c45" alt="코드베이스에서 PersistenceJpaRootAutoConfiguration 를 검색한 출력 10줄. 이 기록이 세는 참조가 그 출력에 그대로 보인다." caption="PersistenceJpaRootAutoConfiguration 코드베이스 검색 — 10줄 · exit 0" zoom="true" :::
켜진 배포에서 무엇이 도달 가능해지나
app.fileserver-platform.enabled=true이면 Fileserver entity/repository/component scan이 열린다. FileserverStorageConfiguration.fileserverSchemaActivation()은 JdbcOperations가 있으면 startup에서 requireActive()를 호출한다. 따라서 schema activation, quota, cleanup, recovery adapter는 Fileserver capability가 켜진 배포에서 production-reachable하다.
revision이 2에서 멈춘다
V1은 registry에 jpa-fileserver-metadata-v1, feature_revision=1, INSTALLED_INACTIVE를 기록하고, V2는 recovery schema를 추가한 뒤 revision을 2로 올린다. 이후 V3는 fenced cleanup lease column을, V4는 upload terminal lifecycle column을 추가하지만 registry revision은 더 이상 갱신하지 않는다. 이 차이는 아래 startup fail-open finding의 직접 원인이다.