Files
document-haness/docs/clean-architecture-backend-template/tech-log-studio/state-ownership-and-concurrency/reference/reference-messaging-spring-cloud-stream-bridge-f06.md
T
DongHyeonkaandClaude Opus 5 b2963105a8 docs(keycloak-session-store): import the session-storage lab as a new project
The keycloak project ended with four open questions that design could not
settle. A two-VM lab was built to answer them by measurement, and this is
that material: 26 experiments, 125 raw command outputs, 22 browser captures.

Follows the import procedure in README.md.

  source/     the originating repository verbatim — 78 documents, 28 SVGs,
              8 manifests, plus .source-revision recording the commit
  final/      the SSOT
    document.md   729 lines written from the 29 experiment documents, not
                  concatenated: what was predicted, what was measured, and
                  where the measurement itself was wrong
    evidence/raw    125 outputs, flattened to <experiment>__<file> because
                    the originals collided (01-baseline.txt appeared three
                    times) and the audit only globs the top level
    evidence/meta   one per raw file; command and exitCode are null and the
                    README says why rather than inventing them
    evidence/browser  22 captures
    assets/       three diagrams through techviz
    .techviz/     their VizSpecs

A separate project rather than an addition to keycloak: the B-layer answers
that project's four questions, but the A, C and D layers are about cluster
failure, SSO and operations, and one document.md should hold one subject.
The four question records there can point here through 관계.

Recorded rather than papered over: only three of the 28 diagrams were
remade. The repository forbids hand-drawn SVG and forbids titles inside the
canvas; all 28 originals carry both, so converting them is redrawing, not
reformatting. They stay in source/ and the gap is written into the document.

verify-pipeline.py passes. audit-records.py reports no issues.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-04 22:51:59 +09:00

1.7 KiB

kind, slug, title, topic, project, status, sourceRevision, rootTreeNode, verifiedOn, source
kind slug title topic project status sourceRevision rootTreeNode verifiedOn source
REFERENCE messaging-spring-cloud-stream-bridge-f06 에러 메시지가 지시하는 설정은 그 설정을 읽는 코드와 함께 존재해야 한다 state-ownership-and-concurrency clean-architecture-backend-template 게시 전 21234e38cdb9a926cbc92bb97a2aee2e4a7d2916 reference:messaging-spring-cloud-stream-bridge-f06
analysis/messaging/messaging-spring-cloud-stream-bridge.md#L597

에러 메시지가 지시하는 설정은 그 설정을 읽는 코드와 함께 존재해야 한다

목적

STREAM_BRIDGE_DISABLED 메시지가 지시하는 프로퍼티를 읽는 코드가 없다. 이 저장소에서 같은 형태가 세 번째다 — messaging-kafka-share-experimental 과 messaging-claim-check 가 앞선 둘이다.

규칙

  1. 메시지에 등장하는 키를 검색한다 git grep -n 'spring-cloud-stream=true' -- src 가 이 leaf 의 문자열 하나만 돌려준다.

  2. 같은 형태가 가족 안에 몇 번 있는지 센다 세 leaf 가 같은 방식으로 실행 불가능한 지시를 남겼다. 개별 실수가 아니라 형태다.

  3. 바인딩을 만들거나 메시지에서 키를 뺀다 지시는 실행 가능할 때만 지시다.

적용 조건

실패 메시지가 복구 방법을 프로퍼티 키로 제시하는 모든 자리.

예외

SSOT 가 이 규칙의 반례를 적지 않았다. 배선 계획이 확정된 키를 미리 안내하는 경우라면 그 사실이 메시지 안에 있어야 한다.

예시

backend.messaging.bridge.spring-cloud-stream=true 가 STREAM_BRIDGE_DISABLED 메시지에만 존재한다는 것.