Files
document-haness/docs/clean-architecture-backend-template/tech-log-studio/transaction-and-consistency-models/concept/concept-adapter-outbound-persistence-jpa-c42.md
T
DongHyeonkaandClaude Opus 5 b2963105a8 docs(keycloak-session-store): import the session-storage lab as a new project
The keycloak project ended with four open questions that design could not
settle. A two-VM lab was built to answer them by measurement, and this is
that material: 26 experiments, 125 raw command outputs, 22 browser captures.

Follows the import procedure in README.md.

  source/     the originating repository verbatim — 78 documents, 28 SVGs,
              8 manifests, plus .source-revision recording the commit
  final/      the SSOT
    document.md   729 lines written from the 29 experiment documents, not
                  concatenated: what was predicted, what was measured, and
                  where the measurement itself was wrong
    evidence/raw    125 outputs, flattened to <experiment>__<file> because
                    the originals collided (01-baseline.txt appeared three
                    times) and the audit only globs the top level
    evidence/meta   one per raw file; command and exitCode are null and the
                    README says why rather than inventing them
    evidence/browser  22 captures
    assets/       three diagrams through techviz
    .techviz/     their VizSpecs

A separate project rather than an addition to keycloak: the B-layer answers
that project's four questions, but the A, C and D layers are about cluster
failure, SSO and operations, and one document.md should hold one subject.
The four question records there can point here through 관계.

Recorded rather than papered over: only three of the 28 diagrams were
remade. The repository forbids hand-drawn SVG and forbids titles inside the
canvas; all 28 originals carry both, so converting them is redrawing, not
reformatting. They stay in source/ and the gap is written into the document.

verify-pipeline.py passes. audit-records.py reports no issues.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-04 22:51:59 +09:00

54 lines
2.9 KiB
Markdown

---
kind: CONCEPT
slug: adapter-outbound-persistence-jpa-c42
title: 여섯 package만 스캔하므로 같은 리프 안에서도 도달성이 다르다
topic: transaction-and-consistency-models
project: clean-architecture-backend-template
status: 게시 전
sourceRevision: 21234e38cdb9a926cbc92bb97a2aee2e4a7d2916
rootTreeNode: concept:adapter-outbound-persistence-jpa-c42
evidenceCapturedOn: 2026-09-01
assets:
- key: adapter-outbound-persistence-jpa-c42
file: ../../../final/evidence/rendered/adapter-outbound-persistence-jpa-c42.svg
- key: adapter-outbound-persistence-jpa-c42-diagram
file: ../../../final/assets/diagrams/adapter-outbound-persistence-jpa-c42.svg
evidence:
- ../../../final/evidence/raw/adapter-outbound-persistence-jpa-c42.txt
source:
- 원본 분석 절은 analysis/05-adapter-outbound-persistence-jpa.md#L2971 이다.
module: adapter-outbound-persistence-jpa
---
# 여섯 package만 스캔하므로 같은 리프 안에서도 도달성이 다르다
`JpaAdapterComponentsConfig`는 adapter 전체를 넓게 scan하지 않고 `audit`·`failure`·`idempotency`·`lock`·`outbox`·`transaction` 여섯만 명시적으로 component scan한다.
## 본문
<!-- body:start -->
`JpaAdapterComponentsConfig`는 adapter 전체를 넓게 scan하지 않고 `audit`·`failure`·`idempotency`·`lock`·`outbox`·`transaction` 여섯 package만 명시적으로 component scan한다.
## narrow scan이 닿는 범위
:::evidence key="adapter-outbound-persistence-jpa-c42-diagram" alt="스캔 경계 안에 여섯 package 가 두 상자로 들어 있고 두 어댑터가 경계 밖 빗금 상자로 놓인 구조" caption="narrow scan 이 닿는 범위" zoom="false"
:::
`OutboxStoreAdapter`는 baseline scan에 들어가고 `app-bootstrap``OutboxConfig``OutboxStorePort`로 사용한다. `DurableOperationStoreAdapter`, `JpaLiveEventReplayAdapter`는 현재 baseline component scan에 들어가지 않고 별도 production constructor/reference도 확인되지 않았다.
## JpaAdapterComponentsConfig 참조 위치
:::evidence key="adapter-outbound-persistence-jpa-c42" alt="코드베이스에서 JpaAdapterComponentsConfig 를 검색한 출력 5줄. 이 기록이 세는 참조가 그 출력에 그대로 보인다." caption="JpaAdapterComponentsConfig 코드베이스 검색 — 5줄 · exit 0" zoom="true"
:::
## default composition에 들어가지 않는 것
`HibernateCacheGuard`, `HibernateEnversHistoryReader`와 Spring Data auditing candidate도 default composition에 들어가지 않는다. runtime-role verifier 자체는 app-bootstrap bean으로 구성되지만, policy를 적용하는 `requireSafe()` caller가 없다.
## 판정을 세 등급으로 나누는 이유
이 차이 때문에 아래 finding은 `production`, `conditional-production`, `latent`를 분리해 판정한다. 정적 composition snapshot은 `evidence/raw/072-baseline-capability-reachability.txt`에 남겼다.
<!-- body:end -->