DongHyeonkaandClaude Opus 5
b2963105a8
The keycloak project ended with four open questions that design could not
settle. A two-VM lab was built to answer them by measurement, and this is
that material: 26 experiments, 125 raw command outputs, 22 browser captures.
Follows the import procedure in README.md.
source/ the originating repository verbatim — 78 documents, 28 SVGs,
8 manifests, plus .source-revision recording the commit
final/ the SSOT
document.md 729 lines written from the 29 experiment documents, not
concatenated: what was predicted, what was measured, and
where the measurement itself was wrong
evidence/raw 125 outputs, flattened to <experiment>__<file> because
the originals collided (01-baseline.txt appeared three
times) and the audit only globs the top level
evidence/meta one per raw file; command and exitCode are null and the
README says why rather than inventing them
evidence/browser 22 captures
assets/ three diagrams through techviz
.techviz/ their VizSpecs
A separate project rather than an addition to keycloak: the B-layer answers
that project's four questions, but the A, C and D layers are about cluster
failure, SSO and operations, and one document.md should hold one subject.
The four question records there can point here through 관계.
Recorded rather than papered over: only three of the 28 diagrams were
remade. The repository forbids hand-drawn SVG and forbids titles inside the
canvas; all 28 originals carry both, so converting them is redrawing, not
reformatting. They stay in source/ and the gap is written into the document.
verify-pipeline.py passes. audit-records.py reports no issues.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
48 lines
2.5 KiB
Markdown
48 lines
2.5 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
kind: CONCEPT
|
|
slug: messaging-transport-spi-c02
|
|
title: 세 leaf의 타입이 public 시그니처에 직접 등장한다
|
|
topic: delivery-and-settlement-models
|
|
project: clean-architecture-backend-template
|
|
status: 게시 전
|
|
sourceRevision: 21234e38cdb9a926cbc92bb97a2aee2e4a7d2916
|
|
rootTreeNode: concept:messaging-transport-spi-c02
|
|
evidenceCapturedOn: 2026-09-01
|
|
assets:
|
|
- key: messaging-transport-spi-c02
|
|
file: ../../../final/evidence/rendered/messaging-transport-spi-c02.svg
|
|
evidence:
|
|
- ../../../final/evidence/raw/messaging-transport-spi-c02.txt
|
|
source:
|
|
- 원본 분석 절은 analysis/messaging/messaging-transport-spi.md#L90 이다.
|
|
module: messaging-transport-spi
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# 세 leaf의 타입이 public 시그니처에 직접 등장한다
|
|
|
|
들어오는 것: messaging-core-api(api), messaging-schema-api(api), messaging-policy(api). 셋 다 api인 이유는 세 leaf의 타입이 이 leaf의 public 시그니처에 직접 등장하기 때문이다 — TransportPublishRequest가 DestinationProfile(policy)·MessageEnvelope(core-api)·EncodedMessage(schema-api)를 필드로 갖는다.
|
|
|
|
## 관계
|
|
|
|
- **멱등 종료를 보장하는 컴포넌트는 종료 이후의 등록도 정의한다**
|
|
같은 분석 리프에서 끌어낸 규칙이다.
|
|
- **같은 개념의 sentinel은 계층을 넘어 하나로 정한다**
|
|
같은 분석 리프에서 끌어낸 규칙이다.
|
|
|
|
## 본문
|
|
|
|
<!-- body:start -->
|
|
|
|
들어오는 것은 `messaging-core-api`(api), `messaging-schema-api`(api), `messaging-policy`(api)다. 셋 다 `api`인 이유는 세 leaf의 타입이 이 leaf의 public 시그니처에 직접 등장하기 때문이다 — `TransportPublishRequest`가 `DestinationProfile`(policy)·`MessageEnvelope`(core-api)·`EncodedMessage`(schema-api)를 필드로 갖는다.
|
|
|
|
## TransportPublishRequest 참조 위치
|
|
|
|
:::evidence key="messaging-transport-spi-c02" alt="코드베이스에서 TransportPublishRequest 를 검색한 출력 4줄. 이 기록이 세는 참조가 그 출력에 그대로 보인다." caption="TransportPublishRequest 코드베이스 검색 — 4줄 · exit 0" zoom="true"
|
|
:::
|
|
|
|
## 나가는 쪽
|
|
|
|
`messaging-runtime-core`, `messaging-kafka`, `messaging-kafka-share-experimental`, `messaging-rabbit`, `messaging-pulsar-experimental`, `messaging-nats-experimental`, `messaging-admin-runtime`, `messaging-spring-cloud-stream-bridge`, `messaging-spring-boot-starter`, `messaging-testkit`. 런타임 편입은 starter closure를 통해서다. 이 leaf 자체는 bean을 만들지 않는다.
|
|
|
|
<!-- body:end -->
|