The keycloak project ended with four open questions that design could not
settle. A two-VM lab was built to answer them by measurement, and this is
that material: 26 experiments, 125 raw command outputs, 22 browser captures.
Follows the import procedure in README.md.
source/ the originating repository verbatim — 78 documents, 28 SVGs,
8 manifests, plus .source-revision recording the commit
final/ the SSOT
document.md 729 lines written from the 29 experiment documents, not
concatenated: what was predicted, what was measured, and
where the measurement itself was wrong
evidence/raw 125 outputs, flattened to <experiment>__<file> because
the originals collided (01-baseline.txt appeared three
times) and the audit only globs the top level
evidence/meta one per raw file; command and exitCode are null and the
README says why rather than inventing them
evidence/browser 22 captures
assets/ three diagrams through techviz
.techviz/ their VizSpecs
A separate project rather than an addition to keycloak: the B-layer answers
that project's four questions, but the A, C and D layers are about cluster
failure, SSO and operations, and one document.md should hold one subject.
The four question records there can point here through 관계.
Recorded rather than papered over: only three of the 28 diagrams were
remade. The repository forbids hand-drawn SVG and forbids titles inside the
canvas; all 28 originals carry both, so converting them is redrawing, not
reformatting. They stay in source/ and the gap is written into the document.
verify-pipeline.py passes. audit-records.py reports no issues.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
53 lines
2.1 KiB
Markdown
53 lines
2.1 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
kind: CONCEPT
|
|
slug: messaging-observability-c02
|
|
title: 재료 둘만 bean으로 있고 그것을 조립하는 것이 없다
|
|
topic: observability-models
|
|
project: clean-architecture-backend-template
|
|
status: 게시 전
|
|
sourceRevision: 21234e38cdb9a926cbc92bb97a2aee2e4a7d2916
|
|
rootTreeNode: concept:messaging-observability-c02
|
|
evidenceCapturedOn: 2026-09-01
|
|
assets:
|
|
- key: messaging-observability-c02
|
|
file: ../../../final/evidence/rendered/messaging-observability-c02.svg
|
|
evidence:
|
|
- ../../../final/evidence/raw/messaging-observability-c02.txt
|
|
source:
|
|
- 원본 분석 절은 analysis/messaging/messaging-observability.md#L70 이다.
|
|
module: messaging-observability
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# 재료 둘만 bean으로 있고 그것을 조립하는 것이 없다
|
|
|
|
출하 조립에서 bean으로 등록되는 것은 `MessagingRedactor`와 `CardinalityGuard` 둘이다. 둘 다 `MessagingMetrics`의 생성자 인자인데 `MessagingMetrics` bean이 없다.
|
|
|
|
## 관계
|
|
|
|
- **타입이 문서화한 불변식은 타입이 강제한다**
|
|
같은 분석 리프에서 끌어낸 규칙이다.
|
|
|
|
## 본문
|
|
|
|
<!-- body:start -->
|
|
|
|
들어오는 것: `messaging-core-api`(api), `micrometer-core`(api). 나가는 것: `messaging-runtime-core`, `messaging-kafka`, `messaging-rabbit`, `messaging-admin-runtime`, `messaging-pulsar-experimental`, `messaging-nats-experimental`, `messaging-spring-boot-starter`.
|
|
|
|
## 출하 조립이 등록하는 bean 둘
|
|
|
|
| bean | 라인 | 소비 |
|
|
|---|---:|---|
|
|
| `MessagingRedactor` | `MessagingCoreAutoConfiguration:253` | **없음** |
|
|
| `CardinalityGuard` | `:264` | **없음** |
|
|
|
|
## MessagingMetrics 참조 위치
|
|
|
|
:::evidence key="messaging-observability-c02" alt="코드베이스에서 MessagingMetrics 를 검색한 출력 16줄. 이 기록이 세는 참조가 그 출력에 그대로 보인다." caption="MessagingMetrics 코드베이스 검색 — 16줄 · exit 0" zoom="true"
|
|
:::
|
|
|
|
## 재료는 있는데 조립하는 bean이 없다
|
|
|
|
두 클래스는 `MessagingMetrics`의 생성자 인자다. 그런데 `MessagingMetrics` bean이 없다(§12.1). `MessagingTracer`·`MessagingAuditSink`·`DefaultMessagingObservationConvention`은 bean도 없고 소비자도 없다.
|
|
|
|
<!-- body:end -->
|