Files
document-haness/docs/clean-architecture-backend-template/tech-log-studio/runtime-reachability-and-composition/case/case-messaging-testkit-f06.md
T
DongHyeonkaandClaude Opus 5 b2963105a8 docs(keycloak-session-store): import the session-storage lab as a new project
The keycloak project ended with four open questions that design could not
settle. A two-VM lab was built to answer them by measurement, and this is
that material: 26 experiments, 125 raw command outputs, 22 browser captures.

Follows the import procedure in README.md.

  source/     the originating repository verbatim — 78 documents, 28 SVGs,
              8 manifests, plus .source-revision recording the commit
  final/      the SSOT
    document.md   729 lines written from the 29 experiment documents, not
                  concatenated: what was predicted, what was measured, and
                  where the measurement itself was wrong
    evidence/raw    125 outputs, flattened to <experiment>__<file> because
                    the originals collided (01-baseline.txt appeared three
                    times) and the audit only globs the top level
    evidence/meta   one per raw file; command and exitCode are null and the
                    README says why rather than inventing them
    evidence/browser  22 captures
    assets/       three diagrams through techviz
    .techviz/     their VizSpecs

A separate project rather than an addition to keycloak: the B-layer answers
that project's four questions, but the A, C and D layers are about cluster
failure, SSO and operations, and one document.md should hold one subject.
The four question records there can point here through 관계.

Recorded rather than papered over: only three of the 28 diagrams were
remade. The repository forbids hand-drawn SVG and forbids titles inside the
canvas; all 28 originals carry both, so converting them is redrawing, not
reformatting. They stay in source/ and the gap is written into the document.

verify-pipeline.py passes. audit-records.py reports no issues.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-04 22:51:59 +09:00

67 lines
2.2 KiB
Markdown

---
kind: CASE
slug: messaging-testkit-f06
title: BrokerFailureMatrix.adapters() 는 호출부가 0건이다
topic: runtime-reachability-and-composition
project: clean-architecture-backend-template
status: 게시 전
sourceRevision: 21234e38cdb9a926cbc92bb97a2aee2e4a7d2916
rootTreeNode: case:messaging-testkit-f06
evidenceCapturedOn: 2026-09-01
assets:
- key: messaging-testkit-f06
file: ../../../final/evidence/rendered/messaging-testkit-f06.svg
evidence:
- ../../../final/evidence/raw/messaging-testkit-f06.txt
source:
- 원본 분석 절은 analysis/messaging/messaging-testkit.md#L976 이다.
module: messaging-testkit
priority: P3
---
# BrokerFailureMatrix.adapters() 는 호출부가 0건이다
public 메서드이나 아무도 쓰지 않는다. 이 리프의 다른 public 표면은 전부 소비자가 있다.
## 문제
public 메서드이나 아무도 쓰지 않는다.
이 리프의 다른 public 표면은 전부 소비자가 있다.
## 결론
제거하거나, 진단용이라면 그렇게 적는다.
## 검증 환경
OpenJDK : 21.0.12 java -version 으로 확인
Gradle : 9.0.0 src/gradle/wrapper/gradle-wrapper.properties 의 distributionUrl 로 확인
확인 방식 : adapters() 호출부 검색과 이 리프의 다른 public 표면의 소비자 유무 대조
소스 수정 : x
## 재현 조건
원문은 analysis/messaging/messaging-testkit.md#L976 에 있다.
## 본문
<!-- body:start -->
`BrokerFailureMatrix.adapters()` 는 public 메서드이나 아무도 쓰지 않는다.
## adapters() 의 호출부
:::evidence key="messaging-testkit-f06" alt="분석 문서 analysis/messaging/messaging-testkit.md 에서 이 기록의 근거 절을 그대로 잘라낸 15줄. 코드베이스를 측정한 것이 아니라 원본 판정이 무엇을 적었는지를 보여 준다." caption="analysis/messaging/messaging-testkit.md 발췌 — 15줄" zoom="true"
:::
## 이 리프의 다른 public 표면은 전부 소비자가 있다
제거하거나, 진단용이라면 그렇게 적는다.
## 확인하지 못한 것
리플렉션이나 서비스 로더로 부르는 형태는 배제하지 못했다. 이름 기반 검색으로만 확인했다.
<!-- body:end -->