The keycloak project ended with four open questions that design could not
settle. A two-VM lab was built to answer them by measurement, and this is
that material: 26 experiments, 125 raw command outputs, 22 browser captures.
Follows the import procedure in README.md.
source/ the originating repository verbatim — 78 documents, 28 SVGs,
8 manifests, plus .source-revision recording the commit
final/ the SSOT
document.md 729 lines written from the 29 experiment documents, not
concatenated: what was predicted, what was measured, and
where the measurement itself was wrong
evidence/raw 125 outputs, flattened to <experiment>__<file> because
the originals collided (01-baseline.txt appeared three
times) and the audit only globs the top level
evidence/meta one per raw file; command and exitCode are null and the
README says why rather than inventing them
evidence/browser 22 captures
assets/ three diagrams through techviz
.techviz/ their VizSpecs
A separate project rather than an addition to keycloak: the B-layer answers
that project's four questions, but the A, C and D layers are about cluster
failure, SSO and operations, and one document.md should hold one subject.
The four question records there can point here through 관계.
Recorded rather than papered over: only three of the 28 diagrams were
remade. The repository forbids hand-drawn SVG and forbids titles inside the
canvas; all 28 originals carry both, so converting them is redrawing, not
reformatting. They stay in source/ and the gap is written into the document.
verify-pipeline.py passes. audit-records.py reports no issues.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
43 lines
2.1 KiB
Markdown
43 lines
2.1 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
kind: CONCEPT
|
|
slug: adapter-outbound-objectstorage-c03
|
|
title: ObjectReference가 보장하는 route 구획
|
|
topic: security-and-trust-boundaries
|
|
project: clean-architecture-backend-template
|
|
status: 게시 전
|
|
sourceRevision: 21234e38cdb9a926cbc92bb97a2aee2e4a7d2916
|
|
rootTreeNode: concept:adapter-outbound-objectstorage-c03
|
|
evidenceCapturedOn: 2026-09-01
|
|
assets:
|
|
- key: adapter-outbound-objectstorage-c03
|
|
file: ../../../final/evidence/rendered/adapter-outbound-objectstorage-c03.svg
|
|
evidence:
|
|
- ../../../final/evidence/raw/adapter-outbound-objectstorage-c03.txt
|
|
source:
|
|
- 원본 분석 절은 analysis/09-adapter-outbound-objectstorage.md#L135 이다.
|
|
module: adapter-outbound-objectstorage
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# ObjectReference가 보장하는 route 구획
|
|
|
|
`RoutingObjectReadAdapter.load`는 `canonicalText`를 분리한 뒤 두 번째 구획을 직접 읽는다. 별도 인덱스 검사는 없지만 `ObjectReference` 생성자가 `ObjectIdentitySupport.requireRouted(canonicalText, "osr1")`로 형식을 강제하므로, 유효한 참조에는 route 구획이 항상 존재한다.
|
|
|
|
## 본문
|
|
|
|
<!-- body:start -->
|
|
|
|
## 직접 인덱싱과 입력 불변식
|
|
|
|
`RoutingObjectReadAdapter.load`는 `reference.canonicalText().split("\\.", -1)[1]`로 route token을 읽는다. 이 코드만 보면 두 번째 구획이 없을 때 `ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException`이 발생할 수 있다.
|
|
|
|
## RoutingObjectReadAdapter 참조 위치
|
|
|
|
:::evidence key="adapter-outbound-objectstorage-c03" alt="코드베이스에서 RoutingObjectReadAdapter 를 검색한 출력 5줄. 이 기록이 세는 참조가 그 출력에 그대로 보인다." caption="RoutingObjectReadAdapter 코드베이스 검색 — 5줄 · exit 0" zoom="true"
|
|
:::
|
|
|
|
## ObjectReference가 보장하는 형식
|
|
|
|
`ObjectReference` 생성자는 `ObjectIdentitySupport.requireRouted(canonicalText, "osr1")`를 통해 routed 형식을 먼저 검증한다. 따라서 정상적으로 생성된 `ObjectReference`가 `load`에 전달되는 경로에서는 두 번째 구획이 값 타입의 불변식으로 보장된다. 현재 계약에서는 이 split 자체를 결함으로 분류할 근거가 없다.
|
|
|
|
<!-- body:end -->
|