37 lines
1.9 KiB
Markdown
37 lines
1.9 KiB
Markdown
# Review rubric
|
|
|
|
Review the complete document after each revision. Do not review only the paragraphs named in the previous findings.
|
|
|
|
## Deterministic findings
|
|
|
|
Treat schema validation, required-heading order, Markdown integrity, dangerous commands, metadata leakage, citation mode, required procedure elements, `STYLE002`, and `STYLE003` as deterministic results. Report their exact code and location. Do not reinterpret or downgrade them through model judgment.
|
|
|
|
## Independent judgment
|
|
|
|
Assess these dimensions independently:
|
|
|
|
- reader goal alignment and information architecture;
|
|
- logical and causal flow;
|
|
- completeness of decision rationale;
|
|
- usefulness and status of evidence;
|
|
- reader-facing prose and cognitive load;
|
|
- example verifiability and operational safety;
|
|
- trade-offs, limits, rollback, and open questions.
|
|
|
|
For Korean technical blogs and READMEs under `korean_first_person_experience_v1`, verify that:
|
|
|
|
- the opening and major transitions establish supported `저는/제가` experience;
|
|
- performed work uses `했습니다` and current behavior uses `합니다`;
|
|
- first person represents a real observation, action, or decision;
|
|
- unfamiliar terms are explained where first needed;
|
|
- every contrast names the components and behaviors that actually differ;
|
|
- no personal history, emotion, conversation, failure, duration, result, or rationale was invented.
|
|
|
|
## Finding shape
|
|
|
|
Each material finding states the section, problem, reader or safety impact, concrete correction, and severity. A strength never cancels a blocker. Questions identify missing evidence rather than inviting plausible invention.
|
|
|
|
## Acceptance
|
|
|
|
Accept only when deterministic lint is within the configured limits, every required independent review completed, the composite score meets the threshold, blocker count is allowed, and `quality-gate.json` records a pass. Mock-provider scores are synthetic fixtures and cannot establish writing or factual quality.
|