Files
document-haness/docs/clean-architecture-backend-template/tech-log-studio/delivery-and-settlement-models/concept/concept-grpc-admin-c02.md
T
DongHyeonkaandClaude Opus 5 b2963105a8 docs(keycloak-session-store): import the session-storage lab as a new project
The keycloak project ended with four open questions that design could not
settle. A two-VM lab was built to answer them by measurement, and this is
that material: 26 experiments, 125 raw command outputs, 22 browser captures.

Follows the import procedure in README.md.

  source/     the originating repository verbatim — 78 documents, 28 SVGs,
              8 manifests, plus .source-revision recording the commit
  final/      the SSOT
    document.md   729 lines written from the 29 experiment documents, not
                  concatenated: what was predicted, what was measured, and
                  where the measurement itself was wrong
    evidence/raw    125 outputs, flattened to <experiment>__<file> because
                    the originals collided (01-baseline.txt appeared three
                    times) and the audit only globs the top level
    evidence/meta   one per raw file; command and exitCode are null and the
                    README says why rather than inventing them
    evidence/browser  22 captures
    assets/       three diagrams through techviz
    .techviz/     their VizSpecs

A separate project rather than an addition to keycloak: the B-layer answers
that project's four questions, but the A, C and D layers are about cluster
failure, SSO and operations, and one document.md should hold one subject.
The four question records there can point here through 관계.

Recorded rather than papered over: only three of the 28 diagrams were
remade. The repository forbids hand-drawn SVG and forbids titles inside the
canvas; all 28 originals carry both, so converting them is redrawing, not
reformatting. They stay in source/ and the gap is written into the document.

verify-pipeline.py passes. audit-records.py reports no issues.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-04 22:51:59 +09:00

55 lines
1.7 KiB
Markdown

---
kind: CONCEPT
slug: grpc-admin-c02
title: 배수 순서
topic: delivery-and-settlement-models
project: clean-architecture-backend-template
status: 게시 전
sourceRevision: 21234e38cdb9a926cbc92bb97a2aee2e4a7d2916
rootTreeNode: concept:grpc-admin-c02
evidenceCapturedOn: 2026-09-01
assets:
- key: grpc-admin-c02
file: ../../../final/evidence/rendered/grpc-admin-c02.svg
evidence:
- ../../../final/evidence/raw/grpc-admin-c02.txt
source:
- 원본 분석 절은 analysis/grpc/grpc-admin.md#L65 이다.
module: grpc-admin
---
# 배수 순서
beginDrain 이 앞의 둘을 한 번에 수행하고, 그 전에 rejectNewAdmission 을 부르면 던진다. 조정자는 잠들지 않는다.
## 본문
<!-- body:start -->
배수 순서가 여섯 단계로 고정돼 있다.
```text
READINESS_FALSE → HEALTH_DRAINING → REJECT_NEW_ADMISSION → DRAIN_UNARY → SIGNAL_STREAMS → FORCE_CANCEL
```
## beginDrain 이 앞의 둘을 한 번에 한다
그 전에 `rejectNewAdmission` 을 부르면 던진다.
> "refusing calls before readiness has flipped produces errors for traffic that routing is still sending"
## 이 기록이 다루는 범위
:::evidence key="grpc-admin-c02" alt="코드베이스에서 파일 목록을 만든 출력 13줄. 이 기록이 다루는 범위가 그 목록이다." caption="코드베이스 파일 목록 — 13줄 · exit 0" zoom="true"
:::
## 조정자는 잠들지 않는다
> "It is given the current moment and the counts, and returns whether the phase is done; the waiting belongs to the caller, which is what makes every branch of this testable without a clock."
## 예산은 누적이다
스트림 신호 완료 판정이 `unaryDrainBudget + streamSignalBudget` 을 기준으로 한다.
<!-- body:end -->