DongHyeonkaandClaude Opus 5
b2963105a8
The keycloak project ended with four open questions that design could not
settle. A two-VM lab was built to answer them by measurement, and this is
that material: 26 experiments, 125 raw command outputs, 22 browser captures.
Follows the import procedure in README.md.
source/ the originating repository verbatim — 78 documents, 28 SVGs,
8 manifests, plus .source-revision recording the commit
final/ the SSOT
document.md 729 lines written from the 29 experiment documents, not
concatenated: what was predicted, what was measured, and
where the measurement itself was wrong
evidence/raw 125 outputs, flattened to <experiment>__<file> because
the originals collided (01-baseline.txt appeared three
times) and the audit only globs the top level
evidence/meta one per raw file; command and exitCode are null and the
README says why rather than inventing them
evidence/browser 22 captures
assets/ three diagrams through techviz
.techviz/ their VizSpecs
A separate project rather than an addition to keycloak: the B-layer answers
that project's four questions, but the A, C and D layers are about cluster
failure, SSO and operations, and one document.md should hold one subject.
The four question records there can point here through 관계.
Recorded rather than papered over: only three of the 28 diagrams were
remade. The repository forbids hand-drawn SVG and forbids titles inside the
canvas; all 28 originals carry both, so converting them is redrawing, not
reformatting. They stay in source/ and the gap is written into the document.
verify-pipeline.py passes. audit-records.py reports no issues.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
53 lines
2.0 KiB
Markdown
53 lines
2.0 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
kind: CONCEPT
|
|
slug: messaging-policy-c08
|
|
title: RetryDecision 변형에 반응하는 파일 넷 중 셋이 선언과 테스트다
|
|
topic: delivery-and-settlement-models
|
|
project: clean-architecture-backend-template
|
|
status: 게시 전
|
|
sourceRevision: 21234e38cdb9a926cbc92bb97a2aee2e4a7d2916
|
|
rootTreeNode: concept:messaging-policy-c08
|
|
evidenceCapturedOn: 2026-09-01
|
|
assets:
|
|
- key: messaging-policy-c08
|
|
file: ../../../final/evidence/rendered/messaging-policy-c08.svg
|
|
evidence:
|
|
- ../../../final/evidence/raw/messaging-policy-c08.txt
|
|
source:
|
|
- 원본 분석 절은 analysis/messaging/messaging-policy.md#L617 이다.
|
|
module: messaging-policy
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# RetryDecision 변형에 반응하는 파일 넷 중 셋이 선언과 테스트다
|
|
|
|
messaging-kafka/.../KafkaRetryExecutor.java (생성되지 않음) messaging-policy/.../DefaultRetryDecisionEngine.java (생산자) messaging-policy/.../RetryDecision.java (선언) messaging-policy/.../RetryDecisionEngineTest.java (테스트)
|
|
|
|
## 관계
|
|
|
|
- **구성 오류는 한 예외 타입과 안정 코드로 보고한다**
|
|
같은 분석 리프에서 끌어낸 규칙이다.
|
|
- **저장소 밖 문서를 절 번호로 인용하지 않는다**
|
|
같은 분석 리프에서 끌어낸 규칙이다.
|
|
- **부팅 경로의 알고리즘 복잡도는 문서화한다**
|
|
같은 분석 리프에서 끌어낸 규칙이다.
|
|
|
|
## 본문
|
|
|
|
<!-- body:start -->
|
|
|
|
`RetryDecision` 변형에 실제로 작용하는 파일은 넷이다.
|
|
|
|
| 파일 | 역할 |
|
|
|---|---|
|
|
| `messaging-kafka/.../KafkaRetryExecutor.java` | 생성되지 않음 |
|
|
| `messaging-policy/.../DefaultRetryDecisionEngine.java` | 생산자 |
|
|
| `messaging-policy/.../RetryDecision.java` | 선언 |
|
|
| `messaging-policy/.../RetryDecisionEngineTest.java` | 테스트 |
|
|
|
|
## 이 기록이 다루는 범위
|
|
|
|
:::evidence key="messaging-policy-c08" alt="코드베이스에서 파일 목록을 만든 출력 25줄. 이 기록이 다루는 범위가 그 목록이다." caption="코드베이스 파일 목록 — 25줄 · exit 0" zoom="true"
|
|
:::
|
|
|
|
<!-- body:end -->
|